Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
Nishizumi_AnkoSP

Thought MM Is fixed?

25 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Member
1,923 posts
4,018 battles

So to my surprise just now went to play with my New Mexico and guess what I met 3 tier 8 Battleships that include the Tirpitz but in the end make the game to a draw.. :trollface:

k6JqI1M.jpg

 heLx8Sp.jpg

Spoiler

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,150
[BLUMR]
Moderator
4,163 posts
1,924 battles

Looks like a 6-8 match. Arkbeta got dragged up by the New York, which has +3 MM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,923 posts
4,018 battles

The only thing fixed was CV MM, nothing related to other surface ships.

 

Let me guess the BB and other class is not fixed then -.-ll
Edited by davud1537

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
506 posts
1,386 battles

The only thing fixed was CV MM, nothing related to other surface ships.

 

Equal distribution of DD too :honoring:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
782
[REPOI]
Super Tester_
1,459 posts
7,799 battles

Fail platoons still mess up the MM system.

Stop Fail Platoons.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
6,605 posts
2,889 battles

Would be better if we have restriction about the tier difference in a division

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
759
[LEAK]
Member
2,500 posts
1,545 battles

 

Let me guess the BB and other class is not fixed then -.-ll

 

There's something that requires fixing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,923 posts
4,018 battles

Fail platoons still mess up the MM system.

Stop Fail Platoons.

 

Not my fault on that division still the game is a draw. :honoring:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,040 posts
1,492 battles

 

There's something that requires fixing?

 

+3MM is still there for all non-prem BB.

That includes South Carolina and Kawachi meeting Fuso and New Mexico. I don't know why that doesn't need fixing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
759
[LEAK]
Member
2,500 posts
1,545 battles

I don't know why that doesn't need fixing.

 

Because as many players as possible need to feel the pain some of us felt when fighting KV-1s with 152mm guns... with a Pzkpfw 38(t).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
782
[REPOI]
Super Tester_
1,459 posts
7,799 battles

 

Because as many players as possible need to feel the pain some of us felt when fighting KV-1s with 152mm guns... with a Pzkpfw 38(t).

 

Or my Pz III A against a Maus.

To be fair I did like 400 dmg to him. HE was OP back then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,923 posts
4,018 battles

 

Because as many players as possible need to feel the pain some of us felt when fighting KV-1s with 152mm guns... with a Pzkpfw 38(t).

 

Ships not tanks mates..... :sceptic:

 

Or my Pz III A against a Maus.

To be fair I did like 400 dmg to him. HE was OP back then.

 

Once again is ships not tanks on here ..... :teethhappy:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
759
[LEAK]
Member
2,500 posts
1,545 battles

Or my Pz III A against a Maus.

To be fair I did like 400 dmg to him. HE was OP back then.

 

I'm still not sure what's worse in terms of balance, SPGs back then or CVs now.

Remembering how I destroyed 3 KV-1s with my M7 Priest in a 3v1 situation, I'd say SPGs.

Edited by Retia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,923 posts
4,018 battles

 

I'm still not sure what's worse in terms of balance, SPGs back then or CVs now.

Remembering how I destroyed 3 KV-1s with my M7 Priest in a 3v1 situation, I'd say SPGs.

 

Getting out of topics lol.... :great:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
679 posts
3,631 battles

 

Because as many players as possible need to feel the pain some of us felt when fighting KV-1s with 152mm guns... with a Pzkpfw 38(t).

 

I still fondly remember fighing a Maus in my stock Tiger, many years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,923 posts
4,018 battles

 

I still fondly remember fighing a Maus in my stock Tiger, many years ago.

 

I fought it but dont deal any much dmg on it T_T

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
759
[LEAK]
Member
2,500 posts
1,545 battles

Getting out of topics lol....

 

The topic is about the +-3 tierspread.

The same tierspread (Actually even worse) was active up until ~6 months post WoT's release.

At the same time SPGs were OP due to 0% RnG and HE mechanics.

Currently CVs are being considered unbalanced.

 

It's all connected if one sits done and thinks about it for a while, isnt it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,923 posts
4,018 battles

 

The topic is about the +-3 tierspread.

The same tierspread (Actually even worse) was active up until ~6 months post WoT's release.

At the same time SPGs were OP due to 0% RnG and HE mechanics.

Currently CVs are being considered unbalanced.

 

It's all connected if one sits done and thinks about it for a while, isnt it?

Fine you won still wot nah nah i not gonna play if i do i push my team spg to cliff with my Tiger :trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
139
Alpha Tester
982 posts

Would be better if we have restriction about the tier difference in a division

 

Agreed. There is nothing more frustrating than being in a tier 6 battle and there's a noob division with a tier 2.

 

BTW, "Noob Division". That would be a great name for a band :teethhappy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,923 posts
4,018 battles

 

Agreed. There is nothing more frustrating than being in a tier 6 battle and there's a noob division with a tier 2.

 

BTW, "Noob Division". That would be a great name for a band :teethhappy:

 

Haiz those noob divisions cause us to lose especially a tier 2 Chikuma in tier 7 battle like seriously .... I think Scrub division sound nicer.:sceptic:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
195 posts
356 battles

Don't "fix" (A.K.A nurf) most of the USN CVs. If you do, do it minorly please (since I heard CV and Rebalance :P).

Yea, T3 BB MM needs fixing, SC and Kaw vs. Aoba, NM, Fuso, Cheatland, T5+ CV, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0
[101SP]
Member
4 posts
5,403 battles

Stop the stupid divisions please...just leave the tier 1 & tier 5 in the queue all night and the might work it out eventually. I had a decent run after changes were made to MM and thought we had turned the corner. I started playing with my friends in divisions again and we top our team a lot but get smashed by enemy unequal teams game after game.

 

You know which team is going to win before the game starts...strangely just like WoT...I stopped playing that last year because of MM and now this game by the same people is doing the same thing.

 

Please please stop it! WG please learn your lesson and build a proper MM program with teams that take ALL factors including player quality EQUALLY INTO ACCOUNT. If you don't you'll ruin another very good product.

Regards

Len

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,923 posts
4,018 battles

Stop the stupid divisions please...just leave the tier 1 & tier 5 in the queue all night and the might work it out eventually. I had a decent run after changes were made to MM and thought we had turned the corner. I started playing with my friends in divisions again and we top our team a lot but get smashed by enemy unequal teams game after game.

 

You know which team is going to win before the game starts...strangely just like WoT...I stopped playing that last year because of MM and now this game by the same people is doing the same thing.

 

Please please stop it! WG please learn your lesson and build a proper MM program with teams that take ALL factors including player quality EQUALLY INTO ACCOUNT. If you don't you'll ruin another very good product.

Regards

Len

 

 

You are not refering to me are you??? :sceptic:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
614
[151ST]
Member
1,641 posts
8,101 battles

Easiest way to fix fail divisions without changing anything dynamic:

  • Add in-game information on what tiers each ship will see
  • When there's a disparity in the max tier in a division, add an extra check when clicking on battle for all players. "XXXX Member in this division will mean that this division can see opponents of X Tier - do you wish to continue?" "Yes//No"

 

I don't want them to screw up the disparity and all, as frankly I'd rather be playing a Kuma in a tier 5 division than a Furutaka. I know for a fact that my Kuma will be a little outclassed at Tier 7 match, however I'm ok with that, as I'll DD hunt in my Kuma.

 

The other option is to restrict the Tier range in a platoon a little... Something like 3 tiers...
But I prefer my solution, education and a confirmation of intent...


 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×