Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
CRH380AL

IJN CV dominate the sky

16 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Beta Tester
16 posts
5,717 battles

In the public test version, we can see that IJN cv get buffed in thier flight control. From tier V to tier X, IJN cv dominate the sky, allow them to overrun their USN counterparts.

US cv still got stupid flight control. I think it is time to remove US cv line..................................Yes it is time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,040 posts
1,326 battles

In the public test version, we can see that IJN cv get buffed in thier flight control. From tier V to tier X, IJN cv dominate the sky, allow them to overrun their USN counterparts.

US cv still got stupid flight control. I think it is time to remove US cv line..................................Yes it is time.

 

Oh boy here we go again.

BINGO!!! :P :popcorn::hiding:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,196 posts
2,883 battles

IJN dominate the sky in term of how much exp they make- yes 

USN CV are always poor until tier 8

But a good USN CV player will dominate the sky, IJN planes are made out of MacBooks anyway (like paper). Your two fighters squadron will make mincemeat of any IJN planes anyway

 

Damn it, where are you Halken ?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
4 posts
2,121 battles

Ask for escort with cruiser

 

last night I positioned my cleveland between our CV and the enemy planes coming over  and voila 25 enemy planes shot down and guess what we had a very happy CV team member


 

you have to remember carriers are useless without support history has proven this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Senior Moderator
4,798 posts
1,924 battles

If you are feeling overwhelmed being out tiered in CV's in general at the moment, have a look at the Public Test running now.

You may find a solution there for your problem....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,040 posts
1,326 battles

If you are feeling overwhelmed being out tiered in CV's in general at the moment, have a look at the Public Test running now.

You may find a solution there for your problem....

 

No, what he is afraid of is how many IJN CV gets air superiority loadout now.

Ryujo: 3/1/1 (I don't know what can you do with 1 TB and 1DB squad, but hey it's better than Indy's 1 DB) :hiding:

Hiryu & Shoukaku: 3/1/2

Taiho and Hakuryu had Air superiority loadout for a long while now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,196 posts
2,883 battles

 

No, what he is afraid of is how many IJN CV gets air superiority loadout now.

Ryujo: 3/1/1 (I don't know what can you do with 1 TB and 1DB squad, but hey it's better than Indy's 1 DB) :hiding:

Hiryu & Shoukaku: 3/1/2

Taiho and Hakuryu had Air superiority loadout for a long while now.

Yep, it's time for me to quit US CV line now, remove them War Gaming. You decided to take things out on USN again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Super Tester
2,314 posts
7,094 battles

Status quo, IJN CV CAG seems fine but WG really needs to work on USN CV CAG. Just looking at it makes me wonder if WG wants us to douse our misery with bottles of vodka or what.

 

I'm not sure which tier 5 is worse... Bogue or Furutaka. At least with Saipan or Indi previosly, you can still run. 2 battles into Bogue and I already hate that CVE. Langley and Hosho were better.

Edited by Makise_Kuristina

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,040 posts
1,326 battles

Yep, it's time for me to quit US CV line now, remove them War Gaming. You decided to take things out on USN again

 

More like they are focusing on balancing IJN CV first. USN CV are second on the list after IJN. (It was IJN CV bomber spamming that caused balance problem in the first place).

You should think that WG is being slow on getting the things right, rather than "they hate this so they did that", that's bad mentality and are really subjective.

 

And oh btw: For USN CV you are better off using Balanced or Strike loadout instead. WG is kinda drunk on how they insisted on these roles but then the reality is reversed. (Essex and Midway are better at strikes than Taiho and Hakuryu IMO)

 

Status quo, IJN CV CAG seems fine but WG really needs to work on USN CV CAG. Just looking at it makes me wonder if WG wants us to douse our misery with bottles of vodka or what.

 

I'm not sure which tier 5 is worse... Bogue or Furutaka. At least with Saipan or Indi previosly, you can still run. 2 battles into Bogue and I already hate that CVE. Langley and Hosho were better.

 

Bogue indeed is horrible, I'm hoping them to solve the problem with her and Range sometime soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
2,150 posts
486 battles

If it's the IJN CVs that rule everything (and I'm not commenting on that), why would you remove the USN CVs?

 

Bit like saying the HEAT-54 is OP; I know, let's remove the E-50!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,040 posts
1,326 battles

If it's the IJN CVs that rule everything (and I'm not commenting on that), why would you remove the USN CVs?

 

Bit like saying the HEAT-54 is OP; I know, let's remove the E-50!

 

I don't know, some people just have that mentality "this is better so we don't need anything else" sort of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,923 posts
4,018 battles

If it's the IJN CVs that rule everything (and I'm not commenting on that), why would you remove the USN CVs?

 

Bit like saying the HEAT-54 is OP; I know, let's remove the E-50!

 

He must be mad that US CV Keep dominating the skies but which is true US did get the air superiority in history but not in here -.-!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
9 posts
2,592 battles

If it's the IJN CVs that rule everything (and I'm not commenting on that), why would you remove the USN CVs?

 

Bit like saying the HEAT-54 is OP; I know, let's remove the E-50!

I guess his point is that USN CV (as it is now, balance-wise) is not worth existing in WOWS. Better that WG scratch the USN CV tree off so IJN CVs can duke it out among themselves, which at this point would provide better balance for players...

 

Of course that won't be a good solution but if WG can't balance USN VS IJN CVs it will eventually become like that.

What I've heard about 4.1 PT progress is kinda dissapointing. WG practically approved Blueline play by not implementing any penalty and it seems that high tier IJN CVs got buffed (in relation to matching USN CVs)

 

The only thing that looks good appears to be one of the new maps (the other one sounds awful because of lighting issue) and the new game rule that result in fewer draws.

Edited by Ghostray325

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,923 posts
4,018 battles

I guess his point is that USN CV (as it is now, balance-wise) is not worth existing in WOWS. Better that WG scratch the USN CV tree off so IJN CVs can duke it out among themselves, which at this point would provide better balance for players...

 

Then what the point for making this game with US DD,CL,CA and BB only when US CV Tree is out of the line??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,043 posts
4,300 battles

 

And oh btw: For USN CV you are better off using Balanced or Strike loadout instead. WG is kinda drunk on how they insisted on these roles but then the reality is reversed. (Essex and Midway are better at strikes than Taiho and Hakuryu IMO)

 

 

not really, tier IX - X US CV's strike load torpedo bombers are on par with IJN's, but IJNs take the advantage on dive bombers, specially with the captain perk (5 bombers). IJN's plane service time and bomber cruise speed is also faster so they are still at advantage.

 

I share with the OP's sentiment as a fellow USN CV player who have played a lot since they gave taiho and hakuryu that ridiculous 3-2-2/4-2-2 loadout. People fail to see our point b/c they haven't experienced being on an Essex Vs. a taiho with 3-2-2 considering you two have equal skills, you just feel like pure crap. You can take USN CV's crappy 3-0-2 air superiority setup, but that won't gurantee air superiority as IJN fighters can easily keep up with USNs at this tier. You can also pick the mediocre 2-1-1 from lexington and you won't feel like you are in a tier 9 ship.

 

For now, let's just wait for the 4.1 as it seems like WG has FINALLY taken notice of IJNs obvious OPness. "According to research, they demonstrate abnormally high battle performance even when used by less experienced players. " - as WG referred to IJN CV players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×