Jump to content
Jeruk_Swag

Matchmaking Preferences

20 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Member
127 posts
6,502 battles

Alright, by the time this game gets out of Beta I hope there will be tweaks to matchmaking, so that we can choose how we want to play the game.

 

I suggest an option like this "No Aircraft Carriers" when searching for a game.

 

This would enable all the [content removed] who use OP carriers to still use them at their heart's content, yet leave us who don't wish to get hit by 3 squads of TBs and have nothing to do about it to be able to play without having to constantly deal with the [content removed] who say "HURR DURR, YOU WEREN'T MOVING", "HURR DURR, YOU WERNE'T PAYING ATTENTION", "HURR DURR, WHAT DO YOU MEAN YOUR SHIP CAN'T DODGE 3 SQUADS OF TORPS"

 

listen to the community, devs

 

Insults or derogatory comments. Post edited, user sanctioned.

~Noppers

Edited by Noppers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
6,604 posts
2,477 battles

No aircraft carrier, great...

Now when no one want CV on their game

Who the hell CV will battle with? Another CV???

 

Forget it, and I knew the next thread will be "NO DD AND TORP MM PREFERENCE"

 

now where the hell is my popcorn??!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Super Tester
630 posts
9,481 battles

Bad idea. If there was a "waah I don't wanna play against CV" option, then who will CVs play against?

 

Clevelands and Atlantas :trollface:

 

 

 

But no jokes aside sounds like a horrible idea to me and will never happen anyways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Senior Moderator
4,798 posts
1,924 battles

 

This could work though, but there needs to be AI escorts.

 

more CV's - 12 v 12 CV's and watch everyone's GPU melt .... (now where is that dev address book.....)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Super Tester
2,725 posts

That's terrible idea.

Stop calling them OP Carrier. Learn how NOT to play "catch the torpedoes & bombs" game.

And have your team Cruisers protect you.

Edited by Mingfang47

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Already in Alpha Testers
300 posts
938 battles

I don't want to play against BB's. They have too many hit points and their guns shred my cruisers. I demand you give me the option to have games where there are no BB's to ruin my fun.

 

And when I play DD's I don't want to have cruisers etc, etc,

 

/sarcasm off

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
358 posts
7,415 battles

Alright, by the time this game gets out of Beta I hope there will be tweaks to matchmaking, so that we can choose how we want to play the game.

 

I suggest an option like this "No Aircraft Carriers" when searching for a game.

 

This would enable all the [content removed] who use OP carriers to still use them at their heart's content, yet leave us who don't wish to get hit by 3 squads of TBs and have nothing to do about it to be able to play without having to constantly deal with the [content removed] who say "HURR DURR, YOU WEREN'T MOVING", "HURR DURR, YOU WERNE'T PAYING ATTENTION", "HURR DURR, WHAT DO YOU MEAN YOUR SHIP CAN'T DODGE 3 SQUADS OF TORPS"

 

listen to the community, devs

 

 

 

Have you noticed no one is on your side?

Listen to the community indeed.

 

Quote updated.

~Noppers

 

Edited by Noppers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
127 posts
6,502 battles

 

Have you noticed no one is on your side?

Listen to the community indeed.

 

 

That's because this forum is exclusive for the [content removed] who use carriers.

 

This place is dominated by [content removed] who use nothing but carriers.

 

Post edited, user already sanctioned.

~Noppers

Edited by Noppers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
70 posts
890 battles

I have been reading the Battle of Jutland and other major battles today. I know this game isn't realistic, obviously.

But I would enjoy a game of older dreadnoughts, CA, CL, and DD - roughly corresponding to the lower tiers - without carriers.

Which would correspond more accurately to battles like Jutland - before planes became a force.

I play BB mostly and the idea of playing in a BB line with cruisers and DD doing the work in between appeals.

I think it would be fun to constantly dodge torpedo attacks while trying to concentrate fire on the opposing BB line.

On a larger Ocean map and a longer time limit would be a great option IMHO.

 

And for the CVs you could do the Battle of Cape Engano (Halsey's part of the Battle of Leyte Gulf).

The Japanese side had only 4CV accompanied by DDs against a superior USN group of lots of everything.

So set one team of 4CVs and the rest DD, against a normally mixed team.

That could be a lot of fun for the higher tier players, I think.

 

A few different options based loosely on historical battles WOULD be good, IMHO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
753 posts
657 battles

 

That's because this forum is exclusive for the [content removed] who use carriers.

 

This place is dominated by [content removed] who use nothing but carriers.

 

Post edited, user already sanctioned.

~Noppers

 

Wow so i'm a Carrier user. Well golly gee the salt is strong with this one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
6,604 posts
2,477 battles

So we are the [Content Removed]

That only play Carrier

Awesome, this player make my day (not touch any carrier since OBT start)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
2,150 posts
486 battles

I have been reading the Battle of Jutland and other major battles today. I know this game isn't realistic, obviously.

But I would enjoy a game of older dreadnoughts, CA, CL, and DD - roughly corresponding to the lower tiers - without carriers.

Which would correspond more accurately to battles like Jutland - before planes became a force.

I play BB mostly and the idea of playing in a BB line with cruisers and DD doing the work in between appeals.

I think it would be fun to constantly dodge torpedo attacks while trying to concentrate fire on the opposing BB line.

On a larger Ocean map and a longer time limit would be a great option IMHO.

 

And for the CVs you could do the Battle of Cape Engano (Halsey's part of the Battle of Leyte Gulf).

The Japanese side had only 4CV accompanied by DDs against a superior USN group of lots of everything.

So set one team of 4CVs and the rest DD, against a normally mixed team.

That could be a lot of fun for the higher tier players, I think.

 

A few different options based loosely on historical battles WOULD be good, IMHO.

 

For what it's worth (which is nothing I suppose, lol) I commented back in Alpha that WoWS would in many respects have been more interesting if set in WWI and not 2 as there were bigger navies for many nations and a ton of different ships with different roles and characteristics. Too many people know next to nothing about WWI naval combat; hell, many people know sod all about most history. Plus I suspect they want to cash in on all the Japanese with their bizarre kiddie-pron versions of history, so that won't work LOL.

 

Incidentally, I'd be perfectly happy to have a 'no CV mode'. But I also know it won't happen, so it's rather pointless.

 

Just as I'd happily have had a 'no SPG' mode in WoT, as would a gazillion other players. And it took them YEARS even to implement a cap of 5 per battle for SPGs, which is kind of funny because 5 might as well be 8 for all that they change game play.

 

At least the devs had the brains to hard cap CVs from the start. Whether that's for game play or the game engine causing melt downs with all the extra air pollution I don't know, however.

Edited by Steeltrap

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×