Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
R3negade

I don't blame CV too op but MM. LOL :3

38 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,454
[VOR]
Super Tester
1,398 posts
14,838 battles

I wonder is that hard to put a limit on MM to not to match players with a tier gap of 2  (maybe 3.

Already seen like Zuiho vs Taihou, ( even you give me 2 Zuiho in the team, I'd say we still gonna lose the air superiority 

and not to mention those troll divisions, bring their newbie friends into a high tier battle :sceptic:

 

I think we don't mind to wait a little longer for a good battle. Instant join after clicking battle button but match you into a unfair fight just makes no sense :l

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
570 posts
3,063 battles

there are alot of noobs right now in high tier that do not have a clue how to play , they have used gold ship and bought there way into tier 9-10 .... find a good team is very hard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
653
[POI]
Beta Tester
4,888 posts
9,936 battles

For other ships like BB, CA, DD 2-3 tier gap is ok.

 

But for CV it should be in the same tier and same amount of ships, Im not a CV player but most of my CV player friend always crying when they have to fight a higher Tier CV or going up against 2 CVs by him self.

Unable to fight back and got gang up by 2 CVs at that starting of the match, I don't think thats much fun for anyone. :D:D:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
123
[STGGC]
Member
936 posts

For other ships like BB, CA, DD 2-3 tier gap is ok.

 

But for CV it should be in the same tier and same amount of ships, Im not a CV player but most of my CV player friend always crying when they have to fight a higher Tier CV or going up against 2 CVs by him self.

 

Unable to fight back and got gang up by 2 CVs at that starting of the match, I don't think thats much fun for anyone. :D:D:D

Unless you are able to outsmart the higher tier (which has like a low chance of happening).

 

Nevertheless, large gaps among carriers really ain't fun at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
548 posts

Duh, it's basically the same in WoT. While your team only have 1 Tier IX and 1 Tier VIII SPG, but their team have 1 Tier X SPG. Totally balanced.

*I don't hate CV/SPG but the MM is kinda suck.*

Edited by DavidNsy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
220
[YAE]
Member
1,230 posts
3,315 battles

Here's a conclusion of the game status right now!, 

Low tier=Full of Nobs and TK'd

High tier=Rich noobs

Cuz they buy their way u lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
653
[POI]
Beta Tester
4,888 posts
9,936 battles

Here's a conclusion of the game status right now!, 

Low tier=Full of Nobs and TK'd

High tier=Rich noobs

Cuz they buy their way u lol

 

Sooo I'm basically a rich noob because i have Tier 8 DD ?, What logic is that :D:D:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
548 posts

Here's a conclusion of the game status right now!, 

Low tier=Full of Nobs and TK'd

High tier=Rich noobs

Cuz they buy their way u lol

Well, they want good stats so they buy Tier VI and VIII Premium, also mean they don't have to fight against newbs.

=> Buy means more money

More money means Wargaming is happy :)

Edited by DavidNsy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,454
[VOR]
Super Tester
1,398 posts
14,838 battles

Well, they want good stats so they buy Tier VI and VIII Premium, also mean they don't have to fight against newbs.

=> Buy means more money

More money means Wargaming is happy :)

Wargaming is happy, but players isn't :(

but I guess SerB don't give a faq to us anyway :v

Edited by R3negade
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
123
[STGGC]
Member
936 posts

Well, they want good stats so they buy Tier VI and VIII Premium, also mean they don't have to fight against newbs.

=> Buy means more money

More money means Wargaming is happy :)

 

Atago

 

Atago everywhere

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
548 posts

Wargaming is happy, but players isn't :(

but I guess SerB don't give a faq to us anyway :v

Well, it's business. Did you expect something more ?

// j/k, they'll think about the balance ASAP.

 

Atago

 

Atago everywhere

Duh, it's Tier VIII and Premium, also a favorite Kancolle character of many people. 

Edited by DavidNsy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
378
Member
1,634 posts
4,639 battles

Duh, it's basically the same in WoT. While your team only have 1 Tier IX and 1 Tier VIII SPG, but their team have 1 Tier X SPG. Totally balanced.

*I don't hate CV/SPG but the MM is kinda suck.*

 

That's not a good comparison. What would be better is if your enemy had 2 T10s, and you had 1 (or none).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
548 posts

 

That's not a good comparison. What would be better is if your enemy had 2 T10s, and you had 1 (or none).

Nah, enemy team have 3 Tier X HT and your team have 1 Tier X SPG. Well, balanced.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,040 posts
1,490 battles

It is practically impossible for a Zuiho to see a Taiho. The highest tier Zuiho can meet is tier6.

However, was that Taiho in a division by any chance? because if it paired with a tier6 BB or tier7 CA/DD it could get matched up against tier9.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
653
[POI]
Beta Tester
4,888 posts
9,936 battles

It is practically impossible for a Zuiho to see a Taiho. The highest tier Zuiho can meet is tier6.

However, was that Taiho in a division by any chance? because if it paired with a tier6 BB or tier7 CA/DD it could get matched up against tier9.

 

Nope either Zuihou or Taihou were in the Division or such, I can confirm that cuz im (think) in the same match with him :D:D:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
270
[LEAK]
Beta Tester
2,718 posts
1,988 battles

They just need to make each team had the same amount of CV and their tiers added up should be equal (e.g. Tier 6 + Tier 8 vs Tier 7 + Tier 7). Thats all I hope for.

Edited by Alvin1020
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
653
[POI]
Beta Tester
4,888 posts
9,936 battles

They just need to make each team had the same amount of CV and their tiers added up should be equal (e.g. Tier 6 + Tier 8 vs Tier 7 + Tier 7). Thats all I hope for.

 

+1 for this post hope it will eventually happens :D:D:D 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
548 posts

They just need to make each team had the same amount of CV and their tiers added up should be equal (e.g. Tier 6 + Tier 8 vs Tier 7 + Tier 7). Thats all I hope for.

Well, basically what you've said is like WoT MM at the moment. But it's a great idea. :hiding:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4
[WOLF]
Alpha Tester
60 posts
3,643 battles

It's not the CV fault. It's the division fault.

CV usually got drag uptier by their division mate.

 

8rLeHdQ.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,454
[VOR]
Super Tester
1,398 posts
14,838 battles

Well, basically what you've said is like WoT MM at the moment. But it's a great idea. :hiding:

 

WoT has a MM like this now ?
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
548 posts

 

WoT has a MM like this now ?

Nah, I'm just talking about Alvin's idea. It's like WoT in some match..... This can apply for WoWS. I'm not sure. But I think the idea is good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
92
[A-SKY]
Alpha Tester
1,063 posts
679 battles

Dropping another thing here,

 

 

MM will only match you against a carrier if your team had adequate AA dps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,454
[VOR]
Super Tester
1,398 posts
14,838 battles

how about matching NO CV in my side but 1 CV on the opposite :l

this is even unacceptable.

Edited by R3negade
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×