Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
TheURLguy

Update 0.11.9: Submarines

14 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

3,397
[-CAT-]
Member
6,352 posts
22,602 battles
Quote

Submarines in Early Access

It shows that the developers and managers of this game is out-of-touch with the game's mechanics and do not play the game they are developing.

If submarines get homing torpedo (since the developers and managers of this game do not play the game they are developing and don't know how to lead aim),
then by this logic, all ships (Battleships, Cruisers, Destroyers, and Aircraft Carriers) with torpedo armament should also have homing capability.

If submarines does not have the 2 km guarantee detection mechanic (since the developers and managers of this game do not play the game they are developing and still gets spotted within the 2 km guarantee detection radius),
then by this logic, the 2 km guarantee detection should also be removed on all ships. So that all ships can "paly comfortably" as per WG's logic.

 

 

It's as if WG knows that the game they were developing is not built with submarines in mind.

Oh wait, WG does know!

A naval historian hired by WG, yet the historian knows the game better than the WG's own developers and managers.

 

 

And finally, WG also knows and admits that submarines are very unpopular.

https://www.twitch.tv/worldofwarships/clip/InnocentGleamingWheelPeteZaroll-t0B-OafM95vSsi53

 

 

 

 

At this point it's not about the new ship class,
it's about WG in a state-of-denial and the refusal to admit that they were wrong.

Punishing the players rather than themselves for making a bad / poor decision,
and monetization the eff out of their bad / poor decision for their 3 years of sunk-cost-fallacy.

Edited by S0und_Theif
  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,397
[-CAT-]
Member
6,352 posts
22,602 battles
23 hours ago, S0und_Theif said:
And finally, WeeGee also knows and admits that submarines are very unpopular.

https://www.twitch.tv/worldofwarships/clip/InnocentGleamingWheelPeteZaroll-t0B-OafM95vSsi53

WG Streamer said and I quote:

"We know that you (the players) do not like subs, what do you want us to do?"
"We can see. We are not ignoring it (*cough* B *cough*)."

 

 

If WG has been "not ignoring" and has been truly reading player feedback, then they clearly have 3 options:

Option 1 = The Preferred Option  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

- Keep them in their own game mode (Operations or Submarine Mode).

 

Option 2 = The Most Popular Option  (⌐■_■)

- Remove homing torpedo.

 

Option 3 = The Nuclear Option  (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻

- Remove submarines in the game (They are not part of the original game. Unlike CVs which was in the game since the alpha and beta stages).

 

 

Sadly, WG does not read and take any of the 3 feedbacks given by the playerbase / community.

It's the same tactic / maneuver by WG since 2019.

Quote

Step 1:
WG asks for feedback.
Why playerbase / community does not pay, does not play, or leaves the game?

Step 2:
Playerbase / community gives their feedback.

Step 3:
WG is in a state-of-denial. Reject's playebase / community feedback.
"No! I don't believe you. You go to gulag. hehehehe"

Step 4:
Playerbase / community is not happy that WG reject's playebase / community feedback.
Playerbase / community does not pay, does not play, or leaves the game.

Step 5:
WG questions why playerbase / community does not pay, does not play, or leaves the game?
Asks for feedback.

Repeat!

History repeated itself since 2019.

Edited by S0und_Theif
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,397
[-CAT-]
Member
6,352 posts
22,602 battles

"Good products made by a company, but is so far out-of-touch with their customer and reality, its not funny anymore."

 

The most funniest thing and the most ironic thing about this quote, is that it came form WG's own sponsors.

Edited by S0und_Theif
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,525
Member
7,107 posts
11,687 battles
7 hours ago, S0und_Theif said:

3 hours after the release of the video.

510 likes
630 dislikes

~800 likes and 1,5k dislikes now!

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
146
[WGPLS]
Member
315 posts
11 hours ago, S0und_Theif said:

3 hours after the release of the video.

510 likes
630 dislikes

you made me want to reinstall the YT Dislike Counter extension now wwww

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
146
[WGPLS]
Member
315 posts

image.png.36fc4a81309f7fae155b097d32b71bdd.png

 

WG is aiming for 2k dislikes! Let's help them reach their goal then!

Edited by Well_DoneX3
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5
[ANZAC]
Member
25 posts

If Submarines make to ranked and Clans could be Good bye to WeeGee for me CV's are bad enough, but some ship types have no counter to "Deep sea Cancer"

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
146
[WGPLS]
Member
315 posts
Just now, Slaughta said:

If Submarines make to ranked and Clans could be Good bye to WeeGee for me CV's are bad enough, but some ship types have no counter to "Deep sea Cancer"

Soon they will. Nothing can stop this heretic company from making more people quit their game

  • Cool 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5
[ANZAC]
Member
25 posts
Just now, Well_DoneX3 said:

Soon they will. Nothing can stop this heretic company from making more people quit their game

Such a Shame, spent a lot of Money over the years just to have almost every ship power crept.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11
[LGNDS]
Member
47 posts

I'm deeply dissatisfied that the subs are reaching the full game.
The gameplay with them is broken, and they will push BB's back to the base line - more boring games for all.

I'll vote with my wallet. No more money for WG.
I'll see if I close down my account or not.

  • Cool 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0
[WOMBA]
Member
2 posts
1,173 battles

as far as i know the torpedoes on ships and submarines during the second world war were the same same explosive compound used so why are the ships more damaging than the submarines ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,397
[-CAT-]
Member
6,352 posts
22,602 battles

1 week later:

1,223 likes
3,490 dislikes

image.thumb.png.ff75423feb0aedce549f214f697c097d.png

 

:cap_like:

Edited by S0und_Theif
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×