What happened to the CV plane spotting nerf?.

[Metal_illness]

13 randoms today, 12 of them had 2x enemy cv.

*just dodging for 20 mins is too labour intensive.

My real job is easier work than this fun factory.

WG were going to give planes a radio maximum range weren't they?, so only ships close(r) to the planes could see what the planes were spotting.

[IJN_Katori]

1 minute ago, Metal_illness said:

13 randoms today, 12 of them had 2x enemy cv.

*just dodging for 20 mins is too labour intensive.

My real job is easier work than this fun factory.

WG were going to give planes a radio maximum range weren't they?, so only ships close(r) to the planes could see what the planes were spotting.

Well about that..... they kinda scrap the mechanic because it hurts CV Players?

[Metal_illness]

Just back from a random battle where the enemy got 3x cv, and our team "only" got 2x cv.

Does WG not realize the keasarge is a cv too?.

perma spotted the whole game, our entire team was!.

[Verytis]

Funny thing is the average air concealment is actually increasing, so no its the opposite thats happening.

But at the same time, a CV is the only thing keeping some of them from running completely wild.

[Reinhard_of_Avercland]

You complained about radar disparity between the teams the other day, yet you want the only thing that actually narrows down the disparity to be taken away.

You surely live up your username...

[Puggsley]

19 hours ago, Metal_illness said:

Just back from a random battle where the enemy got 3x cv, and our team "only" got 2x cv.

Does WG not realize the keasarge is a cv too?.

perma spotted the whole game, our entire team was!.

Had a ranked game yesterday where one side had 5 radars (Ohio, 2 x stali, 1 x PR, 1 x DM, 1 x Smalland) , the other none (ohio, 1 x Venezia, 1 x Yoshino, 2 x Smolensks, 1 x Shima).

It went as expected.

[Metal_illness]

8 hours ago, Reinhard_of_Avercland said:

You complained about radar disparity between the teams the other day, yet you want the only thing that actually narrows down the disparity to be taken away.

You surely live up your username...

they are KPIs of one sided mis matching, that WG won't fix.

BOTH of them.

I'm not sure your last comment is normal online acceptable behaviour.

Wait until the USN new BB/cv line comes in, one team will have up to 5 cv on their team, the other maybe 2.

[Metal_illness]

6 hours ago, Puggsley said:

Had a ranked game yesterday where one side had 5 radars (Ohio, 2 x stali, 1 x PR, 1 x DM, 1 x Smalland) , the other none (ohio, 1 x Venezia, 1 x Yoshino, 2 x Smolensks, 1 x Shima).

It went as expected.

Ranked due to it's special MM would make these weighted team MMs worse.

I've not seen 5 radar in one team and none in second team in a random battle...YET.

I think the highest number of radar imbalances in a random has been 3. Something like my team has 2 radar, enemy has 5.

[HobartAWD]

Same like the minimap only spotting. They tell us that closed in house testing is not accurate and cannot be used to judge if something will work or not on live server. Then when many asked what happened to the mini map only spotting change coming to the PTS, the answer is that oh sorry we tried it in a closed test and it didn't work. So sorry about that, we really tried. Bottom line is that they will always do what they want to, regardless of what they say or pretend to be doing.