Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
Paladinum

Some interesting comments on WoWS YT latest video [Size Comparison: Axis ships]

8 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

3,790
Member
6,281 posts
10,896 battles

Not necessarily hide the names because the comments are public.

 

1.JPG.3eb840fe7a5f34acea0c9645e9da8a87.JPG

It's a video on AXIS warships. Read the title maybe?

 

2.JPG.b26d413a51caf1fc81119d9c78060e29.JPG

New to the video format I see.

 

3.JPG.de7edd1eb654173014cc225db55f4062.JPG

There was no need for luck if they had superior number. The US and UK alone could have ended the war themselves.

 

4.JPG.2550e6ceaa5dee86e62b0538ee964529.JPG

Thank for rubbing it in.

 

5.thumb.JPG.c99b8c3f6c2297fd97730aab7cbc0bb4.JPG

Oh yeah, about that game mode... 

 

6.JPG.6f90b7868dd0e8bb544c868f77407540.JPG

lol wut

 

7.thumb.JPG.bfa5ed6e2f127f14d0b1ff54daa9cf3e.JPG

Tomayto tomahto. Nitpicking for what? Pizzaboo being salty?

Edited by Paladinum
  • Funny 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,790
Member
6,281 posts
10,896 battles

From a different video:

8.thumb.JPG.6236c39395e186c02509048cb0be12d4.JPG

This guy might have come from one of those warship waifu gacha games, because he calls Atago "thick for a cruiser". Or just really new/ignorant to the subject of warships. IJN cruisers are really slender. German ones, however, are chonky in the midsection.

Edited by Paladinum
  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,804
[MRI]
Member
4,197 posts
19,239 battles
3 hours ago, Paladinum said:

8.thumb.JPG.6236c39395e186c02509048cb0be12d4.JPG

This guy might have come from one of those warship waifu gacha games, because he calls Atago "thick for a cruiser". Or just really new/ignorant to the subject of warships. IJN cruisers are really slender. German ones, however, are chonky in the midsection.

Maybe he was talking about Atago's forward superstructure section or something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,095
[FORCE]
Modder, Member
3,633 posts
15,835 battles
6 hours ago, Paladinum said:

From a different video:

8.thumb.JPG.6236c39395e186c02509048cb0be12d4.JPG

This guy might have come from one of those warship waifu gacha games, because he calls Atago "thick for a cruiser". Or just really new/ignorant to the subject of warships. IJN cruisers are really slender. German ones, however, are chonky in the midsection.

Atago's mid deck is indeed thick though, at 41mm. Second only to Stalingrad & Petro's.

But the last comment hints that he's just ignorant. I mean even AL Atago is nowhere as thick as Azuma, and every degenerate knows it. Atago is more of a "top heavy".

Edited by Reinhard_of_Avercland

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,790
Member
6,281 posts
10,896 battles

The first reply says that "Alaska and Atago are so thicc they might as well be BBs with torpedoes". Alaska doesn't have torpedoes, so using the plural of battleship is not correct.

The video where the comment is was "Warships Size Comparison: Cruisers". The camera is not at an angle that any viewer can easily see the width of the ships.

Myoko is heavier than Atago, as shown in the video.

He also makes no mention of Stalingrad, which is a longer and heavier ship than Alaska - as shown in the video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IjjB1R8ldE

Alaska isn't even in Azur Lane or Kancolle.

 

So, I have no idea why the heck he said Atago is thick. Which frame of reference is it?

Edited by Paladinum
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×