Upcoming New RN Cruiser Tiger '59 Size comparison

[Not_Ch0m1n]

 

All assets are provided by GM3D.com  (Thank you)

[IJN_Katori]

Basically, Smaller Minotaur.

 

Remember, this is "Tiger 59" not "Tiger"(Probably reserved for a Battlecruiser line)

i think there will be another Battlecruiser tree (Hopefully Repulse)

 

@S0und_Theif @S4pp3R 

[Paladinum]

Do you have Plymouth? 

Neptune is slightly longer than Minotaur, btw

[IJN_Katori]

1 minute ago, Paladinum said:

Do you have Plymouth? 

Neptune is slightly longer than Minotaur, btw

Plymouth wasnt in the scale comparison that the fact its just an Elongated and Thickier Belfast.

[Paladinum]

3 minutes ago, IJN_Katori said:

Plymouth wasnt in the scale comparison that the fact its just an Elongated and Thickier Belfast.

Ah yes, the added thiccness.

[S0und_Theif]

Tiger is "smol".

 

Can you add Plymouth and Fiji as well?

Fiji and Tiger 59' should almost be the same length.

 

I also think, WG might deploy Swiftsure or Superb.

Probably at T6 or T7.

Their hull is based on Tiger 59' and their size is very close to the Fiji class.

[S4pp3R]

1 hour ago, IJN_Katori said:

Basically, Smaller Minotaur.

 

Remember, this is "Tiger 59" not "Tiger"(Probably reserved for a Battlecruiser line)

i think there will be another Battlecruiser tree (Hopefully Repulse)

 

@S0und_Theif @S4pp3R 

They could also be saving the name for earlier versions of her design. I'd have to look it up again but when I was doing CW tree Tiger came up in a few different designs including triple gun.

So my guess would be that in order to future proof themselves.

I would still expect BCs at some point.

[Paladinum]

36 minutes ago, S0und_Theif said:

I also think, WG might deploy Swiftsure or Superb.

You mean more modern Mysore? 

[IJN_Katori]

1 minute ago, S4pp3R said:

They could also be saving the name for earlier versions of her design. I'd have to look it up again but when I was doing CW tree Tiger came up in a few different designs including triple gun.

So my guess would be that in order to future proof themselves.

 

From my Perspective from what i think they are making a Battlecruiser line for the British although the "Tiger" wasn't used for its name, the "Cruiser" has a number while this "Tiger" is what im talking about.

 

 

Maybe WG is leaking a Battlecruiser line (finally?) for the Brits? 

[Paladinum]

HMS Tiger is perhaps the best British battlecruiser by performance during the Battle of Jutland, so Tiger'd better be added in the game 

[Max_Battle]

1 hour ago, IJN_Katori said:

Elongated and Thickier

And full of seamen.

[S0und_Theif]

4 hours ago, Paladinum said:

HMS Tiger is perhaps the best British battlecruiser by performance during the Battle of Jutland, so Tiger'd better be added in the game 

Yes! Yes! Yes!

[THAI_THIEF]

Traversing speed 60 sec

[H_87A_2CU]

I have no understanding why they did this.........Should have used HMS Blake as the name, and also made it as per the original design, but then again it would be a paper ship and surely a game of this caliber wouldn't use paper ships.........

That way we could have something that fits into the British playing style, not use the name Tiger. Personally I think apart from the collectors there's nothing to sell the Tiger 59 to the general players........she will be an XP Pinata

H

[S4pp3R]

35 minutes ago, H_87A_2CU said:

I have no understanding why they did this.........Should have used HMS Blake as the name, and also made it as per the original design, but then again it would be a paper ship and surely a game of this caliber wouldn't use paper ships.........

That way we could have something that fits into the British playing style, not use the name Tiger. Personally I think apart from the collectors there's nothing to sell the Tiger 59 to the general players........she will be an XP Pinata

H

I agree...

However as for strength, I'll wait for the testing to be finished. I was worried about Friesland and she turned out ok...

[H_87A_2CU]

Ok, small DD fairly good rudder shift, lots of over pens on hits very fast reload (1.8 secs) no citadel, vs larger CL, only four guns 3.0 secs reload, with a citadel.....and WG balance department, I mean what could go wrong

 

H

[Admiral_Helena]

No wonder why Minotaur always blows up. There's no way BB AP to overpen that thick hull.