Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
IJN_Katori

Implacable and harugumo buff

15 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

821
[LBAS]
Member
3,378 posts
15,835 battles

PT 0.9.11, BALANCE CHANGES

We've changed the characteristics of several ships, having analyzed their combat performance and taken player feedback into account. Such changes were required to carefully adjust the balance of selected warships. We'll continue to introduce changes in the updates that follow, if deemed necessary.

 

 

X KHABAROVSK; X HARUGUMO:

 

Damage to a ship's HP caused by an AP or SAP shell with a caliber of 280 mm and larger, will no longer exceed 10% of the maximum damage of the shell

VIII IMPLACABLE:

 

Maximum bomb damage increased from 5100 to 5300;

Chance of a bomb causing fire on a target increased from 29% to 30%

VIII KANSAS:

 

Sigma parameter was increased from 1.5 to 1.6

 

 

You know what that means. Implacable spreading inferno than Audacious

Edited by IJN_Katori

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
804
[LYNMF]
Beta Tester
1,982 posts
6,591 battles
7 minutes ago, IJN_Katori said:

@S0und_Theif

Glad I got Implacable.

What a way to start firestorms

:Smile_trollface:

that is 1% moar fuel and 200 more megumins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,668
[-CAT-]
Member
3,394 posts
13,561 battles

Khaba, Harugumo, and Kansas buff is very much welcome in this change.

RIP Kitakaze though. What did she do to deserve this? Da Fudge WG! I enjoy IJN gunboat.

Upon reading, the nerf is minor. I will let it slide.

 

@IJN_Katori I don't have any T8 CV at the moment. But the buff looks good. :fish_book:

They should also buff Oklahoma. From 40 second reload to 35 second.

Edited by S0und_Theif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,587 posts
7,934 battles
3 hours ago, S0und_Theif said:

Khaba, Harugumo, and Kansas buff is very much welcome in this change.

RIP Kitakaze though. What did she do to deserve this? Da Fudge WG! I enjoy IJN gunboat.

Upon reading, the nerf is minor. I will let it slide.

 

@IJN_Katori I don't have any T8 CV at the moment. But the buff looks good. :fish_book:

They should also buff Oklahoma. From 40 second reload to 35 second.

Another key problem with Oklahoma is her atrocious AP shell performance. She uses very poor APs shell that are said to be inferior to even the British short-fuse 343s and old French 305s, if the claim that she uses the stock New York AP shells is true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,385
[MRI]
Member
3,787 posts
16,847 battles
2 minutes ago, Project45_Opytny said:

Another key problem with Oklahoma is her atrocious AP shell performance. She uses very poor APs shell that are said to be inferior to even the British short-fuse 343s and old French 305s, if the claim that she uses the stock New York AP shells is true.

I hope WG gives her the Ashitaka treatment and buffs the AP shells.

Ashitaka used to have the same issue when she was released - she used the old WWI shells which had terrible performance. After she was buffed she is a decent BB now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,587 posts
7,934 battles
Just now, Thyaliad said:

I hope WG gives her the Ashitaka treatment and buffs the AP shells.

Ashitaka used to have the same issue when she was released - she used the old WWI shells which had terrible performance. After she was buffed she is a decent BB now.

I recall Oklahoma's AP shell performance was nerfed just before her release. Though considering Kansas' sigma buff... may she be buffed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
754
[SALT]
Member
2,122 posts
10,571 battles

is the german DD still  can get Pen from AP ? its interesting if only harugumo and khaba get the buff, when they share the same trait

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,668
[-CAT-]
Member
3,394 posts
13,561 battles
22 minutes ago, Project45_Opytny said:

Another key problem with Oklahoma is her atrocious AP shell performance. She uses very poor APs shell that are said to be inferior to even the British short-fuse 343s and old French 305s, if the claim that she uses the stock New York AP shells is true.

Is Arizona the same?

Since Arizona, Oklahoma, New York and Texas use the same guns.

357 mm / 45. :fish_book:

 

I didn't notice that there is a difference in New York Hull A AP and Hull B AP.

Edited by S0und_Theif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,587 posts
7,934 battles
32 minutes ago, S0und_Theif said:

Is Arizona the same?

Since Arizona, Oklahoma, New York and Texas use the same guns.

357 mm / 45. :fish_book:

 

I didn't notice that there is a difference in New York Hull A AP and Hull B AP.

I am sure about my claim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,668
[-CAT-]
Member
3,394 posts
13,561 battles
8 minutes ago, Project45_Opytny said:

I am sure about my claim.

I'm not saying your claim is wrong.

I'm saying that I did not notice that there is such a difference. Hence, I am asking / confirming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
829
[LBAS]
Member
5,308 posts
11,973 battles
11 hours ago, IJN_Katori said:

VIII KANSAS:

 

Sigma parameter was increased from 1.5 to 1.6

As I expected more slow more nerf 

shot-20.11.17_23.44.18-0710.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
830
[SMOKE]
Member
2,488 posts
18,023 battles

And well - care to inform me where can I find SAP of 280mm or more in game now , we all know the issue with over excessive effectiveness of SAP against CL and DD in particular and they are only 203 ... 

Let's admit it WG you just cannot balance the SAP properly ,if it's ok against BB CB then it's way too op against CA CL DD. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×