Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
1366851653

Belfast 43 performance is excessively low

32 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

0
[ROYAL]
Member
24 posts
8,641 battles

WG, you must improve the overall performance of Belfast 1943, the current ship, in terms of rate of fire, radar range, and repair team (none at all) is completely behind all the other class 8 gold ships! Not even as good as her sister ship, Edinburgh! Have you really experimented with this ship yourselves??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
693
[MALD]
[MALD]
Member
711 posts
3,937 battles

They did experiment with a better version before, and you know how well that end.

The Tier VII Belfast. :Smile_trollface:

 

On a more serious note, she seems to be a solid ship, balanced but not having enough identity to justify her status as "premium" ship. This is on "Balanced yet Boring" part of the scale on WG's recent ships introduction.

I think it would be better for her as the Tier VII, swapping places with Belfast 1950s.

Edited by Earl_of_Arland
  • Funny 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
199
[-CAT-]
Member
486 posts
10,528 battles

I think I would prefer to get Mainz or Bayard instead of her. Sorry...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
702
[GS]
Video Contributor, Beta Tester, Clantest Coordinator
2,879 posts
14,444 battles
8 minutes ago, Sharr_Dextera said:

I think I would prefer to get Mainz or Bayard instead of her. Sorry...

for me buy Montpelier xD

ClevelandSticker38.png.04542fd201006a9a87ae3788f8c400cf.png

Edited by Onlinegamer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,021
[OAKUM]
Member
2,131 posts
17,272 battles

I remember people whingeing about Belfast a couple of years ago wanting it nerfed...  "ahh its OP OP OP !!!" "Too strong" "payfast" "cheat ship"...  The nerf club wanted it nerfed, everybody whingeing....

Well, y'all got ya wish ..

So shut up & Enjoy hahahahahah

PS - No more whingeing  

:Smile_trollface:  :Smile_coin:   :Smile_great:

 

 

 

Ordrazz

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0
[ROYAL]
Member
24 posts
8,641 battles
1 分鐘前,Ordrazz 說:

I remember people whingeing about Belfast a couple of years ago wanting it nerfed...  "ahh its OP OP OP !!!" "Too strong" "payfast" "cheat ship"...  The nerf club wanted it nerfed, everybody whingeing....

Well, y'all got ya wish ..

So shut up & Enjoy hahahahahah

PS - No more whingeing  

:Smile_trollface:  :Smile_coin:   :Smile_great:

 

 

 

Ordrazz

What are you talking about? By the time I started playing the game, Belfast had been off the shelves for several years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0
[ROYAL]
Member
24 posts
8,641 battles

WG!!!!!! Did you know that Belfast 43 does less than forty thousand damage per inning? ! Do you want to make your own game or not? !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,673
[-CAT-]
Member
3,409 posts
13,592 battles
1 hour ago, Ordrazz said:

I remember people whingeing about Belfast a couple of years ago wanting it nerfed...  "ahh its OP OP OP !!!" "Too strong" "payfast" "cheat ship"...  The nerf club wanted it nerfed, everybody whingeing....

Well, y'all got ya wish ..

So shut up & Enjoy hahahahahah

PS - No more whingeing  

:Smile_trollface:  :Smile_coin:   :Smile_great:

 

 

 

Ordrazz

That's WG for yah.

1631863183_180owl.thumb.jpg.69701a6127355e53f053c5b1a6c12936.jpg

Now we (WG) be taking yo money now.

hehehehe.......:Smile_trollface:

Edited by S0und_Theif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,073
[LBAS]
Super Tester_
2,077 posts
8 minutes ago, 1366851653 said:

Did you know that Belfast 43 does less than forty thousand damage per inning?

tenor.gif?itemid=13190418

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,559
[REPOI]
[REPOI]
Member
6,779 posts
28,566 battles
1 hour ago, 1366851653 said:

这艘船十分需要皇家维修小组,以及更多的消耗品

if you want to complain in chinese, please go to the trad Chinese section of the forums

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
829
[LBAS]
Member
5,308 posts
11,978 battles
6 hours ago, Onlinegamer said:

for me buy Montpelier xD

ClevelandSticker38.png.04542fd201006a9a87ae3788f8c400cf.png

Why do I care about?

82210760_2441741486092006_8176957195678646272_o.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,405
[151ST]
Member
3,553 posts
11,945 battles
4 hours ago, Drakon233 said:

if you want to complain in chinese, please go to the trad Chinese section of the forums

This...

We honestly don't have an issue with folks that speak other languages in here but by using a language other than English you exclude most of the forum attendees.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,344
[TLS]
Member
4,851 posts
21,287 battles

If Belfast 43 is not to your liking, nobody is forcing you to buy. There are other ships for you to select.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,622
[FORCE]
Modder, Member
3,014 posts
13,714 battles

This is why I'm always skeptical about ship that only sells out because of their names. Some people will buy these ships without reading their specs.

Hurr durr it's Belfast! Best maid means best ship ever!

No no you don't. Belfast is overrated, end of story. Had the fundraising attempt ended in failure, she would have been scrapped too. I mean had the British not falling into bankruptcy, they could have preserved King George V, or even Warspite (although she would cost a heck lot more to repair).

Now excuse me, I'm gonna ask for WG to make Prince of Wales..... Or Repulse... Or Sheffield.... Or Swiftsure... or anything else that should have been in the game.

*angry tea noises

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
693
[MALD]
[MALD]
Member
711 posts
3,937 battles
13 hours ago, Onlinegamer said:

for me buy Montpelier xD

ClevelandSticker38.png.04542fd201006a9a87ae3788f8c400cf.png

Aw, the cold yet cute Cleve sister.

76253870_p0.thumb.png.6132726f1d05a154e8d3f04d85a16f22.png

 

 

Wait, where are we? Right, Belfast '43

4 minutes ago, Reinhard_of_Avercland said:

No no you don't. Belfast is overrated, end of story. Had the fundraising attempt ended in failure, she would have been scrapped too. I mean had the British not falling into bankruptcy, they could have preserved King George V, or even Warspite (although she would cost a heck lot more to repair).

Agreed, Belfast is overrated. Her noteworthy action is being blown by a mine then spent most of her career in drydock. Cheap ass arctic convoy escort with minor part on Battle of North Cape. It should've been Sheffield that be saved for museum, as she has richer story to tell. 

But then again, the Royal Navy's state at that time is so pitiful. Even Victory, the symbol of Nelson and Britannia, is rotting. 

 

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
188 posts
638 battles
8 minutes ago, Reinhard_of_Avercland said:

This is why I'm always skeptical about ship that only sells out because of their names. Some people will buy these ships without reading their specs.

 

8 minutes ago, Reinhard_of_Avercland said:

Now excuse me, I'm gonna ask for WG to make Prince of Wales..... Or Repulse... Or Sheffield.... Or Swiftsure... or anything else that should have been in the game.

Are you not contradicting yourself?

And what would be the selling point for Prince of Wales? Down tiered KGV with weak AA?

Repulse actually makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0
[ROYAL]
Member
24 posts
8,641 battles
12 分鐘前,Reinhard_of_Avercland 說:

This is why I'm always skeptical about ship that only sells out because of their names. Some people will buy these ships without reading their specs.

Hurr durr it's Belfast! Best maid means best ship ever!

No no you don't. Belfast is overrated, end of story. Had the fundraising attempt ended in failure, she would have been scrapped too. I mean had the British not falling into bankruptcy, they could have preserved King George V, or even Warspite (although she would cost a heck lot more to repair).

Now excuse me, I'm gonna ask for WG to make Prince of Wales..... Or Repulse... Or Sheffield.... Or Swiftsure... or anything else that should have been in the game.

*angry tea noises

Yes!! My love of the Royal Navy in world War I and World War II is second only to the people's Navy today. Especially Belfast! As you said, “Best Maid means Best ship ever!” . But WG's Belfast 1943 was so poorly integrated that her sister Edinburgh really couldn't match it. WG calls it "characteristic"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,622
[FORCE]
Modder, Member
3,014 posts
13,714 battles
4 minutes ago, Earl_of_Arland said:

Agreed, Belfast is overrated. Her noteworthy action is being blown by a mine then spent most of her career in drydock. Cheap ass arctic convoy escort with minor part on Battle of North Cape. It should've been Sheffield that be saved for museum, as she has richer story to tell. 

But then again, the Royal Navy's state at that time is so pitiful. Even Victory, the symbol of Nelson and Britannia, is rotting. 

The Brits were simiping for Belfast, before the weebs do:Smile_trollface:

 

2 minutes ago, Admiral_Helena said:

 

Are you not contradicting yourself?

And what would be the selling point for Prince of Wales? Down tiered KGV with weak AA?

Repulse actually makes sense.

Yes, but I'm also making a point.

I mean look, out of all ships that participated in the Battle of Denmark Strait, she is the only one that has yet to exist in this game. And of course you can't claim yourself to be a Eugen lover without pairing her with that Yuri blonde islander.

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
88 posts
7,981 battles

Ship is balanced. Played 1 match and did not find it bad like some people claim it is.

Will my opinion change with more games? Probably.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,179
[AUSNZ]
Beta Tester
1,497 posts
11,881 battles

Belfast 43 does look pretty bad.  She's straight up worse than Belfast in most respects.  The HE dpm for the T7 version is 20% more than the T8 version!  The T8 has fewer charges of consumables, far worse smoke (the RN DD smoke is great on DD's, but terrible on slow reload cruisers), much worse handling, and although she has torpedoes, they are only 8km with three per side, so next to useless for the type of ship she is.  The only thing the T8 has going for it over the T7 is 8% more health and slightly longer radar/hydro ranges.

Now I know the T7 is known for being OP, but I think the game has moved on to the point where she really isn't.  I have never thought T7 Belfast was particularly amazing, because although strong, she is easy to play against.  In a BB, she is easy to blap in smoke, and in a DD, she has a fairly small area of control with only an 8.5km radar and 4km hydro.  It's very easy to play around these limited ranges.  I think a Belfast is really only effective against bad players (obviously there are plenty of those, so her stats are good, plus she is only owned by very experienced players), which means that for any competent player she is of next to no concern.

Now I don't like playing cruisers at all, so I wouldn't get her, but if I did like cruisers there is a long list of T8 cruisers I'd rather take out than Belfast 43, and if I particularly liked RN CL's, I'd much rather sail any of the tech tree line.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
499
[REPOI]
Member
297 posts
13,859 battles
12 hours ago, 1366851653 said:

这艘船十分需要皇家维修小组,以及更多的消耗品

 

11 hours ago, Drakon233 said:

if you want to complain in chinese, please go to the trad Chinese section of the forums

For a moment I thought I was on the CN section on the forums which I never head off to. Had to double check.

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
209
[4RSE]
Member
403 posts
10,835 battles
3 hours ago, Moggytwo said:

, plus she is only owned by very experienced players),

Actually Moggy, some of us potatoes got Belfast in Xmas crates. Far, far, from experienced players. 

But, that said, I have used her occasionally in random battles and had some slight success in her. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×