Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
Gesterbein

Thunderer Get....

18 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

251
[LGND]
Member
628 posts
14,885 battles

Time to Join Thunderer Gang...

First Time using her, not bad for fire starter + getting reported lul... :Smile_trollface:

 

shot-20.10.14_21.07.53-0717.jpg

shot-20.10.14_21.35.03-0674.jpg

shot-20.10.14_21.35.07-0198.jpg

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,717
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
6,228 posts
33,513 battles

Grats.

I'm going to wait for next coupon and to see if there's any news about what may be removed next.

 

World of Warships Screenshot 2020.10.15 - 16.14.52.68.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
209 posts
12,461 battles

Lots of Thunderers about in Randoms and ranked and clan battles, so in theory, should get removed for the same reason as Musashi and Bart (tilted meta).

Don't get Thunderer because it's awful and I defintely didn't get the Elite BB emblem because of it :Smile_veryhappy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
251
[LGND]
Member
628 posts
14,885 battles
48 minutes ago, _TrogDorTheBurninator_ said:

Lots of Thunderers about in Randoms and ranked and clan battles, so in theory, should get removed for the same reason as Musashi and Bart (tilted meta).

Don't get Thunderer because it's awful and I defintely didn't get the Elite BB emblem because of it :Smile_veryhappy:

Georgia and Thunderer probably got remove because both BB is Too Popular....
Georgia become more popular after JB removed
Thunderer already popular since first release and good pick for ranked...
and Hizen probably will replacing Georgia/Thunderer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,704
[REPOI]
Member
6,865 posts
31,873 battles

JB got removed because they needed a reason to take smolensk of shelves too, I honestly hope that they do the same for Georgia and thunderer, thunderer is already far more meta breaking than smolensk

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21
[HMAS]
Member
83 posts

消火!消火!

 

The Japanese ships have their names in Kanji in the Japanese version? That's interesting.

Edited by Brettr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,517
[LBAS]
Member
2,755 posts
4,924 battles

WG removing Georgia is unacceptable. Unless they Made another Speedy BB. 

 

I have Georgia, but removing it will just bad precedence that WG trying to force US grinding or losing stuff.

I am not definelyninto grinding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,717
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
6,228 posts
33,513 battles
10 hours ago, dejiko_nyo said:

yes, replace thunderer with ohio as coal ship

Yes please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,974
[TLS]
Member
5,738 posts
23,543 battles
7 hours ago, Skarhabek said:

WG removing Georgia is unacceptable. Unless they Made another Speedy BB. 

 

I have Georgia, but removing it will just bad precedence that WG trying to force US grinding or losing stuff.

I am not definelyninto grinding

Replace Georgia with Slava as coal ship.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,911
[-CAT-]
Member
5,390 posts
19,328 battles
18 hours ago, dejiko_nyo said:

yes, replace thunderer with ohio as coal ship. Or Shikimikasa.

 

1 hour ago, dejiko_nyo said:

Replace Georgia with Slava as coal ship.

2134902948_jojoyes.thumb.jpg.dfb4e9522d38208c06cffdabd5a46197.jpg

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,433
[FORCE]
Modder, Member
4,032 posts
17,243 battles
1 hour ago, dejiko_nyo said:

Replace Georgia with Missouri as coal ship.

FTFY.

Look, Missouri is basically old Iowa with radar. I mean the heal buff on US BBs didn't apply on Missouri (or so they said). And of course Missouri is quite rare to see nowadays.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
223
[TF44]
Member
599 posts
29,119 battles
12 hours ago, Skarhabek said:

I am not definelyninto grinding

The greater truth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
80
[NTSB]
Supertester
178 posts
7,760 battles

When will THUNDERER be removed lol...I saw many people only fire HE with it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,911
[-CAT-]
Member
5,390 posts
19,328 battles
5 hours ago, Heavening said:

When will THUNDERER be removed lol

No news yet.

But WG loves to remove "popular" ships.

 

5 hours ago, Heavening said:

I saw many people only fire HE with it

RN BB have high fire chance.

Many players will use HE first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
994 posts
17,228 battles
On 10/17/2020 at 4:34 PM, Heavening said:

When will THUNDERER be removed lol...I saw many people only fire HE with it

RN AP is unreliable. 

Thunderer firing HE just about all the time is no different to Yamato firing AP almost all the time - it's usually the most effective shell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,704
[REPOI]
Member
6,865 posts
31,873 battles
7 minutes ago, lunsmann said:

RN AP is unreliable. 

Thunderer firing HE just about all the time is no different to Yamato firing AP almost all the time - it's usually the most effective shell.

its still a very accurate 457 shell tho

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
2,167 posts
11,722 battles
1 hour ago, lunsmann said:

RN AP is unreliable. 

Thunderer firing HE just about all the time is no different to Yamato firing AP almost all the time - it's usually the most effective shell.

Thunderer has regular fuse AP, however under many circumstances it is indeed more effective to use HE that will certainly cause damage and rather possibly set a fire or two. The AP shells can only lolpen most cruisers and very often they may ricochet on angled battleships.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×