So uhm...

[LawrenceXVIII]

 

Then is it a hint that you give us back Cherry Blossoms or you just want here to insult us Weegee?

[S0und_Theif]

1 hour ago, LawrenceXVIII said:

 

Then is it a hint that you give us back Cherry Blossoms or you just want here to insult us Weegee?

Yup. I think this is the third or fourth time.

When it comes to certain high requirement directives, WG is hell bent on on making sure that players must have should have a dificult time completing the directive.

 

They make absolute sure players will have must have a difficult time, but when it comes to other directives, the mere sight of such poor workmanship is just insult to injury.

So yeah, I question WG's compitency. At some degree / certain point, their intelligence.

 

And since this is the third or fourth time:

 

[Paladinum]

Ctrl + C Ctrl + V mission reqs, only changing the tiers. 

Imagine requiring playing Ranked at T4 

WG pls.

[LawrenceXVIII]

1 hour ago, Paladinum said:

Ctrl + C Ctrl + V mission reqs, only changing the tiers. 

Imagine requiring playing Ranked at T4 

WG pls.

Weegee plz

[Grygus_Triss]

6 hours ago, Paladinum said:

Ctrl + C Ctrl + V mission reqs, only changing the tiers. 

Imagine requiring playing Ranked at T4 

WG pls.

I don’t buy it.

Every time there is “destroyed” requirements, WG makes sure that you can’t do it in ops.

If Cherry Blossom was still around, WG would not allow you to do the objective in it.

They probably think that killing ships in ops is too easy.

Its no harder than killing in co op, it’s just that co op takes longer.

[Max_Battle]