Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
WorIdofWarsheeps

ST 0.9.7, CHANGES TO TEST SHIPS

19 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

615
[KOREA]
Moderator, Community Contributor, Super Tester_
826 posts
8,015 battles

Please note that all information in the development blog is preliminary and subject to change during testing. Any showcased features may or may not end up on the main server. The final information will be published on our game's website.

 

X FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT:

  • Number of rockets on attack aircraft reduced from 30 to 28.

British Tier VIII cruiser Belfast '43:

  • Range of Surveillance Radar reduced from 10 to 9 km;
  • Smoke screen dispersion time reduced from 60 to 40 s;

VIII KANSAS:

  • Sigma parameter reduced from 1.7 to 1.5;
  • Defensive AA Fire consumable added in a separate slot.

IX MINNESOTA:

  • Defensive AA Fire consumable added in a separate slot.

X VERMONT:

  • Defensive AA Fire consumable added in a separate slot.

VII FLORIDA:

  • Amount of hit points reduced from 63 800 to 51 800;
  • Main battery guns reload time increased from 31.5 to 33.5 s;
  • Maximum HE shell damage lowered from 5 000 to 4 750;
  • Chance of HE shell causing fire lowered from 30% to 22%.

IX PAOLO EMILIO:

  • Maximum SAP shell damage lowered from 3 350 to 3 050.
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
620
[AN-DO]
Beta Tester
1,759 posts
5,809 battles

Are you for real????

Kansas Sigma Nerf again???

Okay then... They gave DFAA to all Dreadnoughts... BUT its still useless dammit!

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
731
[LBAS]
Member
3,103 posts
14,590 battles

The Belfast smoke seems unacceptable but the 9km Radar seems like her Tier 7 Belfast herself

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,281
[-CAT-]
Member
2,534 posts
11,644 battles

What the fudge is with all these nerfs?

nani.thumb.jpg.9f9bd20dedfea21a7eb2cc0beeaa3c12.jpg

 

USN DFAA is very welcome, but still no protection against HE spammers. Given with their slow speed.
Even though I know that they are still in testing phase, there is a high concern regarding slow BB against HE spammers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,448 posts
6,179 battles
Just now, S0und_Theif said:

What the fudge is with all these nerfs?

nani.thumb.jpg.9f9bd20dedfea21a7eb2cc0beeaa3c12.jpg

 

USN DFAA is very welcome, but still no protection against HE spammers. Given with their slow speed.
Even though I know that they are still in testing phase, there is a high concern regarding slow BB against HE spammers.

RIP Kansas...

She has neither the reinforced 38-mm deck or the enhanced, regardless of how slight the enhancement is, repair party and now her Sigma has been nerfed to the level of Pommern. And as a T8 USN battleship she does not even have access to accuracy upgrade!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
620
[AN-DO]
Beta Tester
1,759 posts
5,809 battles
1 minute ago, Project45_Opytny said:

RIP Kansas...

She has neither the reinforced 38-mm deck or the enhanced, regardless of how slight the enhancement is, repair party and now her Sigma has been nerfed to the level of Pommern. And as a T8 USN battleship she does not even have access to accuracy upgrade!

Kansas is now Pommern and Alsace!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,281
[FORCE]
Member
2,465 posts
12,337 battles

So basically, radar Edin is still superior than that Belfast. I mean Belfast's radar has shorter range than Edin's. in 1 vs 1 situation, radar Edin can just beat Belfast by staying out of the latter's radar range if the latter do the Belfast thing. And Edin has superheal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
202
[LGND]
Member
533 posts
12,742 battles
1 hour ago, Work_ln_Progress said:

VIII KANSAS:

  • Sigma parameter reduced from 1.7 to 1.5;
  • Defensive AA Fire consumable added in a separate slot.

 

40 sec reload and 1.5 sigma with 32 mm armor....
WG please be honest, you just dumb or id*ot and no clue how to balance this thing right ? 
Just remove kansas and split BB start from T9....

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
738
[LBAS]
Member
4,929 posts
11,043 battles

Well well well I'm not interest these garbages

but Florida still interesting tactics

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
646
[GS]
Video Contributor, Beta Tester, Clantest Coordinator
2,794 posts
13,924 battles

Florida man angry noise far far away

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
59 posts
3 hours ago, Gesterbein said:

40 sec reload and 1.5 sigma with 32 mm armor....
WG please be honest, you just dumb or id*ot and no clue how to balance this thing right ? 
Just remove kansas and split BB start from T9....

You forgot 23kt speed....

So big as a barn, slow as a barn, can't hit the broad side of a barn....

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
122
[IJN]
Member
267 posts
4,759 battles
12 hours ago, Work_ln_Progress said:

VII FLORIDA:

  • Amount of hit points reduced from 63 800 to 51 800;
  • Main battery guns reload time increased from 31.5 to 33.5 s;
  • Maximum HE shell damage lowered from 5 000 to 4 750;
  • Chance of HE shell causing fire lowered from 30% to 22%.

Template | Oof Size Large | Know Your Meme

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,281
[-CAT-]
Member
2,534 posts
11,644 battles

Also, Florida is still Florida and not Louisiana.

While Lunderdorff was changed to Pommern.

I don't think the Lunderdorff name change was pushed by the fans. Since when did WG ever listens to their fans / community / playerbase?
I think it was more of an an Azure Lane push.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,281
[FORCE]
Member
2,465 posts
12,337 battles
5 minutes ago, S0und_Theif said:

I don't think the Lunderdorff name change was pushed by the fans. Since when did WG ever listens to their fans / community / playerbase?
I think it was more of an an Azure Lane push.

Nah I don't think we really push for that change.

Pommern in Chinese is 波美拉尼亚 (Bō měi lā ní yǎ) . While Luderndorff is 波美拉尼亚 (Lǔ dēng dàofū).

I mean despite being full of weebs, AL is still a Chinese product. And as you can see Ludendorff is easier to pronounce than Pommern.

In Japanese: Pommern is ポメラニア (Pomerania). Ludendorff isリューデンドルフ (Ryūdendorufu).

Longer, but is still pronounceable.

And the last thing we need to see is a German furry. Because the British have fallen for it, thanks to that cat called Cheshire.:Smile_trollface:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,281
[-CAT-]
Member
2,534 posts
11,644 battles

 

8 hours ago, Reinhard_of_Avercland said:

Nah I don't think we really push for that change.

Pommern in Chinese is 波美拉尼亚 (Bō měi lā ní yǎ) . While Luderndorff is 波美拉尼亚 (Lǔ dēng dàofū).

I mean despite being full of weebs, AL is still a Chinese product. And as you can see Ludendorff is easier to pronounce than Pommern.

In Japanese: Pommern is ポメラニア (Pomerania). Ludendorff isリューデンドルフ (Ryūdendorufu).

Longer, but is still pronounceable.

I mean AL developers and WoWs developers have the T9 ship ready, but they have different naming.

WoWs dev basically conceded to AL dev, since AL content is a money maker to WoWs.

 

8 hours ago, Reinhard_of_Avercland said:

And the last thing we need to see is a German furry. Because the British have fallen for it, thanks to that cat called Cheshire.:Smile_trollface:

:Smile_veryhappy:

:Smile_great:

 

P.S. I really owe a lot of likes today, yesterday, and the day before. Apologies if I can not like the post at the moment.

Edited by S0und_Theif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15
[LU-NA]
Member
98 posts
3,439 battles
19 hours ago, LawrenceXVIII said:

Are you for real????

Kansas Sigma Nerf again???

Okay then... They gave DFAA to all Dreadnoughts... BUT its still useless dammit!

 

Imagine giving DFAA to ship with weak AA lol.

DFAA will only work on ships who have good AA like EU DD. Thunderer with DFAA on still can't survive a full squadron of Midway planes. 

DFAA is nothing more than accessory on those ships with weak AA. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
620
[AN-DO]
Beta Tester
1,759 posts
5,809 battles
Just now, Arzach said:

Imagine giving DFAA to ship with weak AA lol.

DFAA will only work on ships who have good AA like EU DD. Thunderer with DFAA on still can't survive a full squadron of Midway planes. 

DFAA is nothing more than accessory on those ships with weak AA. 

 

DFAA is dead since the first CV rework.

RTS DFAA were tough strong before.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
196
[TWR]
Alpha Tester
1,404 posts
5,044 battles

VII FLORIDA:

Amount of hit points reduced from 63 800 to 51 800;

Main battery guns reload time increased from 31.5 to 33.5 s;

Maximum HE shell damage lowered from 5 000 to 4 750;

Chance of HE shell causing fire lowered from 30% to 22%.

 

THIS after 3x floridas in a platoon all on same team WHILE being in test mode, being played by super testers....they steam rolled the entire enemy team of course.

The whole battle was a complete waste of time.

Lucky they were on my team for that 1% of the time I get them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×