Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023  Read more... ×
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023  Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
mainak1999

Update 12 vs 12 format

5 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Member
1 post
12,009 battles

The current system is 5 years old seems gerting bored on it. The new ranked season of 3 vs 3 is great . Pls wargaming make this permanent

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,609
[151ST]
Wiki Editor
4,535 posts
16,859 battles

Yeah I'm not sure why WG have been so set on 12 v 12 for so long...

Most people would happily have smaller maps and smaller teams, particularly if it meant more +/- 1 MM, not +/- 2...

I have a hunch it's because of the power of classes such as DD and CV, more players means more chance to mitigate such an advantage.

It saves them needing to actually do some MM coding as well.

That's purely just speculation on my part however

Edited by S4pp3R

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,738
[FORCE]
Modder, Member
4,388 posts
20,131 battles
20 minutes ago, S4pp3R said:

Yeah I'm not sure why WG have been so set on 12 v 12 for so long...

Most people would happily have smaller maps and smaller teams, particularly if it meant more +/- 1 MM, not +/- 2...

I have a hunch it's because of the power of classes such as DD and CV, more players means more chance to mitigate such an advantage.

It saves them needing to actually do some MM coding as well.

That's purely just speculation on my part however

The other problem with the 3 v 3 format is the fact that this format works rather well for the short-ranged combat. For the usual Random? I doubt it.

The current 3 v 3 Sprint forbids CVs from joining the battle. Had it happen on odd tier, imagine the Anti-CV rage posts. Even with the 7 v 7 format during Clan & Ranked Battles, CVs have too much influence.

And lastly, the choices are extremely limited. On this season, we've seen a lot of Pommern, Alaska, and any other strong T9 ships while at the same time the underpowered ones like Neptune, and Tashkent are rarer.

Edited by Reinhard_of_Avercland

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
3 posts
211 battles
1 hour ago, Reinhard_of_Avercland said:

The other problem with the 3 v 3 format is the fact that this format works rather well for the short-ranged combat. For the usual Random? I doubt it.

The current 3 v 3 Sprint forbids CVs from joining the battle. Had it happen on odd tier, imagine the Anti-CV rage posts. Even with the 7 v 7 format during Clan & Ranked Battles, CVs have too much influence.

And lastly, the choices are extremely limited. On this season, we've seen a lot of Pommern, Alaska, and any other strong T9 ships while at the same time the underpowered ones like Neptune, and Tashkent are rarer.

cannot even remember when I last see a Tashkent in any competitive mode , hell not even in Random ................. lol

Edited by Foto25

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,462
[SMOKE]
Member
4,597 posts
26,199 battles

what is needed is bigger Map and 16 vs 16 on high tier with further limitation on ratio of BB vs Cruiser vs DD , right now its like we see a team of 12 vs 12 , CV aside, we are seeing so typical 5 or 6 BB a side, then a couple or even a trio of Super Cruisers, then what's really left there ; and speaking of that before any of such change the Cruiser class should get al re classified as CA, CL, and CB accordingly and should be MM accordingly

Edited by Mechfori

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×