Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
S0und_Theif

-1S, UMR_R, FOR24, FFD and CATS in SEA - Dead

7 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,894
[-CAT-]
Member
3,801 posts
14,476 battles

First EU, then NA, now Asia Pacific / APAC. (Season 9)

APAC.thumb.png.86c30d0a5e1207465aa310b3b6050327.png

 

Wait a sec. 8th season [UMR-R]. 9th season [UMR_R]. :Smile_ohmy:

Are they the same clan? Second time violation? Only disband? :cap_hmm:

What happened to ("in case of further violations we will take more serious measures")? :cap_hmm:

Edited by S0und_Theif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
711
[GS]
Video Contributor, Beta Tester, Clantest Coordinator
2,891 posts
14,551 battles

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
711
[GS]
Video Contributor, Beta Tester, Clantest Coordinator
2,891 posts
14,551 battles
30 minutes ago, S0und_Theif said:

 

Wait a sec. 8th season [UMR-R]. 9th season [UMR_R]. :Smile_ohmy:

Are they the same clan? Second time violation? Only disband? :cap_hmm:

 

i checked that UMR-R and UMR_R are same clan

leader was a ghost account (for created only)

16 players of 22 of 50 i've checked are from UMR-R

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,894
[-CAT-]
Member
3,801 posts
14,476 battles
20 minutes ago, Onlinegamer said:

i checked that UMR-R and UMR_R are same clan

leader was a ghost account (for created only)

16 players of 22 of 50 i've checked are from UMR-R

I see. So it's a 2nd time offense. And that's in a span of 3 months. But WG only disbanded the clan.

So disbanding does not work. As it just shows that the offense can and will be repeated.

Either they will enforce the "further measure". Or just disband the clan and violators continue to create a new one and continue to violate the EULA.

The ball is in WG's hand.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,555
[MRI]
Member
3,946 posts
17,450 battles
13 minutes ago, S0und_Theif said:

I see. So it's a 2nd time offense. And that's in a span of 3 months. But WG only disbanded the clan.

So disbanding does not work. As it just shows that the offense can and will be repeated.

Either they will enforce the "further measure". Or just disband the clan and violators continue to create a new one and continue to violate the EULA.

The ball is in WG's hand.

Precisely.

WG has already shown with the botting issue that they are really unwilling to issue bans. WG has to decide if it wants to take further measures or just keep on disbanding them, which clearly doesn't work.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×