Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023  Read more... ×
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023  Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
DUX_2020

don't buy AL Yukikaze unless they fix it

16 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

10
[OZCO]
Member
34 posts
11,895 battles

wish i'd known before i bought this awful ship.

CONS

8km torpedoes - this in competitive matches (random and ranked) is crazy because you're up against radar, aircraft spotting, ultrasound finder and 'located' skill.

SLOW torpedo reload at 1minute44seconds (this is also insane considering you have to get close to shoot torpedoes)

ONLY 2x4 torpedoes for a premium T8 not good enough for competitive play

below average AA (i think it's the worst AA in the game)

slow (must use speed boost)

PROS

6km concealment

speed boost

Edited by DUX_2020

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,739
[-JK-]
Member
6,887 posts
35,102 battles

what needs to be fixed, so what if the ship is a gimmicky ship, who says that WG isnt allowed to make prems that arnt OP?

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
699
[WGPLS]
Member
717 posts
6,330 battles
18 minutes ago, CV_NMSL said:

what needs to be fixed, so what if the ship is a gimmicky ship, who says that WG isnt allowed to make prems that arnt OP?

this tbh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,066
[TLS]
Member
5,849 posts
24,614 battles

I can't say exactly I'm sympathetic since there are package inserts informing you what the ship comes with and you can make a comparison against other ships and against your playstyle to decide if the ship is for you...

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
325
[TF44]
Member
433 posts
5,641 battles

It all falls down to it's captain.

You can make any good ship bad and you can make any bad ship good. Unless it's Russian.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,738
[FORCE]
Modder, Member
4,388 posts
20,123 battles

To be honest, this ship is not even new. There are a lot of reviews you can look for on the internet before you buy.

The best method to find out whether the premium ship is good or not (if you're a lazy neet that don't browse the web); is by looking at how often you see them in battles.

  • Mainz, Massachusetts, Jean Bart for example; you can see at least one of them in certain tier in like 9 out of 10 battles
  • This ship? I've seen more Oland sailing around despite being a newer ship.
  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,241
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
6,552 posts
41,806 battles
24 minutes ago, dejiko_nyo said:

I can't say exactly I'm sympathetic since there are package inserts informing you what the ship comes with and you can make a comparison against other ships and against your playstyle to decide if the ship is for you...

Caveat Emptor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
88 posts
7,990 battles

At the same time can they buff AL Montpelier. I want 10km radar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Honestly, I'm fine with 9km radar much like the Cleveland.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
39 posts
13,676 battles
59 minutes ago, Nork22 said:

At the same time can they buff AL Montpelier. I want 10km radar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Honestly, I'm fine with 9km radar much like the Cleveland.

And people who purchased it bec of 10km radar got refund....but still sad that WG took it away :((

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10
[OZCO]
Member
34 posts
11,895 battles

i'm thinking it should be VII, it doesn't have much chance vs IX and X

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,739
[-JK-]
Member
6,887 posts
35,102 battles
24 minutes ago, DUX_2020 said:

i'm thinking it should be VII, it doesn't have much chance vs IX and X

F3s against potentially T5s? no thanks

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
757
[REPOI]
Member
379 posts
17,170 battles

WG surely did a fine job milking players for cash with AL ships I'll give them that

10 hours ago, DUX_2020 said:

this in competitive matches (random and ranked) is crazy because you're up against radar, aircraft spotting, ultrasound finder and 'located' skill

Ehhh, I don't think this matters much for you to be honest as you mainly play in coop. There are better tech-tree ships out of there if you wish to play "competively" in ships that can actually carry their weight
Do your research first before buying any premiums, there are quite alot of reviews out there.

Unless you are an Afan yourself and bought it just because of it, then oh well, its on you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,098
[MRI]
Member
4,469 posts
23,033 battles
11 hours ago, DUX_2020 said:

wish i'd known before i bought this awful ship.

CONS

8km torpedoes - this in competitive matches (random and ranked) is crazy because you're up against radar, aircraft spotting, ultrasound finder and 'located' skill.

SLOW torpedo reload at 1minute44seconds (this is also insane considering you have to get close to shoot torpedoes)

ONLY 2x4 torpedoes for a premium T8 not good enough for competitive play

below average AA (i think it's the worst AA in the game)

slow (must use speed boost)

PROS

6km concealment

speed boost

AL Yukikaze is basically a Kagerou with Shimakaze's 8km torps. Apart from the torp range, everything listed can be applied to the Kagerou. So the real question boils down to whether you think Shima's F3 torps are worth using or not.

Besides, AL Yukikaze was first released in the previous AL collaboration, so information on its stats and performance isn't hard to find. If you ran out to buy the ship without any prior research just because you are an AL fan, then that is your own problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,196
[LBAS]
Member
5,895 posts
15,232 battles

No match for Yugumo for the peak of finest DD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×