Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
Skarhabek

Is WoWs still competitive game? Are you still chasing winrate

15 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,716
[LBAS]
Member
3,010 posts
5,536 battles

 

1. CV would rekt anyone at anywhere.... Anytime

2. Why CV Division is allowed?

3. Tech Tree ship is obsolete

4. T9, T10 premium have massive advantage over tech tree ship

5. Most Doubloon ship is worthless 

6. MM is not random at all

7. The T8 and below is forgotten.....

Edited by Skarhabek
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
356
[YOR]
Member
544 posts
18,700 battles

Literally all 7 above can be separate into different topics so everyone can discuss/dig further 😅 all of it are debatable

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
105
[RUCN]
[RUCN]
Member
219 posts
12,968 battles

At least it's not esports gaming for casual players given the ± 2 mm mechanism. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
208
[AN-DO]
Member
457 posts
16,352 battles
2 hours ago, Skarhabek said:

 

1. CV would rekt anyone at anywhere.... Anytime

2. Why CV Division is allowed?

3. Tech Tree ship is obsolete

4. T9, T10 premium have massive advantage over tech tree ship

5. Most Doubloon ship is worthless 

6. MM is not random at all

7. The T8 and below is forgotten.....

1- use some strong AA, and it's ussally not got topr equiped

2- i don't see any but i see tier 6 in tier 10 room, they tier 6-7-8 platoon

3- don't know

4-not know too

5- some are good, but almost seem weaker than normal ship at same tier

6- Agree

7- No, i played at this tier most, and it's fun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,592
[151ST]
Wiki Editor
4,526 posts
16,455 battles
6 hours ago, Skarhabek said:

 

1. CV would rekt anyone at anywhere.... Anytime

2. Why CV Division is allowed?

3. Tech Tree ship is obsolete

4. T9, T10 premium have massive advantage over tech tree ship

5. Most Doubloon ship is worthless 

6. MM is not random at all

7. The T8 and below is forgotten.....

1. It's fine, check my sig block.

2. Again it's fine it's just almost an exploit-type thing until they patch it (I absolutely hate it I might add - if you are referring to spawnpeeking)

3. No they aren't, IJN and USN BBs are still some of the strongest in tier, same goes for their CAs.

4. To a degree, yes. But that's not empirical at all. Drake/Brindisi are some of the strongest Cruisers in tier, and are very strong releases. The real issue is particular high tier premiums; Musashi at T9, Stalingrad at T10, Smolensk. The rest are *shrugs*

5. No they aren't, they earn more credits and that's worth something at minimum. WG just shot themselves in the foot by adding T9 and T10 prems.

6. You sound like your tilting

7. Yes, agreed. WG have this unholy obsession with T9 and T10 and I'm flipping sick of it.

Edited by S4pp3R
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
120
[IWN]
Member
427 posts
3,253 battles
4 hours ago, S4pp3R said:

1. It's fine, check my sig block.

2. Again it's fine it's just almost an exploit-type thing until they patch it (I absolutely hate it I might add - if you are referring to spawnpeeking)

3. No they aren't, IJN and USN BBs are still some of the strongest in tier, same goes for their CAs.

4. To a degree, yes. But that's not empirical at all. Drake/Brindisi are some of the strongest Cruisers in tier, and are very strong releases. The real issue is particular high tier premiums; Musashi at T9, Stalingrad at T10, Smolensk. The rest are *shrugs*

5. No they aren't, they earn more credits and that's worth something at minimum. WG just shot themselves in the foot by adding T9 and T10 prems.

6. You sound like your tilting

7. Yes, agreed. WG have this unholy obsession with T9 and T10 and I'm flipping sick of it.

to the 3rd and 4th point

we need an tech tree bb split for either Japan or the US, they are desperately need that, I mean just look at how much design the US and Japan did, we could even construct another navy with just how much ship left undone in their Navy.
The Pacific Rim Union Navy


Tier III : Satsuma class
Tier IV: Florida class
Tier V:Ise-class 
Tier VI: 3 turret-Lexington class battlecruiser (for the sake of tier VI)
Tier VII: Tosa-class
Tier VIII: South Dakota class (1939)
Tier IX: Number-13 class 
Tier X: either A-150 class or 3 turret 20 inch Montana 


This is just kidding PLZ WG DONT TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY 
 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,592
[151ST]
Wiki Editor
4,526 posts
16,455 battles
7 minutes ago, TakemoriKohoto said:

to the 3rd and 4th point

we need an tech tree bb split for either Japan or the US, they are desperately need that, I mean just look at how much design the US and Japan did, we could even construct another navy with just how much ship left undone in their Navy.
The Pacific Rim Union Navy


Tier III : Satsuma class
Tier IV: Florida class
Tier V:Ise-class 
Tier VI: 3 turret-Lexington class battlecruiser (for the sake of tier VI)
Tier VII: Tosa-class
Tier VIII: South Dakota class (1939)
Tier IX: Number-13 class 
Tier X: either A-150 class or 3 turret 20 inch Montana 


This is just kidding PLZ WG DONT TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY 
 

**BITES**

TBH the five tech lines I want the most:

1. IJN BC (BB split)

2. RM BBs

3. CW CLs

4. CW DDs

5. IJN CLs

I spose you could add RM DDs to that, but I'm not huge on DDs. As usual anytime Commonwealth comes up as a tech nation you run into 'they'd just be RN duplicates'...

How about so would a feasibly built USN BB split, a horde of the premiums in game, 4x2 203mm CAs, Pan-Asia DDs, etc, etc. Seriously Perth/Haida have enough 'different' going for them that I'd be happy with tech lines inspired by that. It's particularly annoying in view of the entire Russian Tech Tree...

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
5,863 posts
14,256 battles

Absurd there no more pleasant every match I nowhere to find real human playing

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,012
[LBAS]
Modder, Member
7,291 posts
56,580 battles
13 hours ago, Skarhabek said:

 

1. CV would rekt anyone at anywhere.... Anytime

2. Why CV Division is allowed?

3. Tech Tree ship is obsolete

4. T9, T10 premium have massive advantage over tech tree ship

5. Most Doubloon ship is worthless 

6. MM is not random at all

7. The T8 and below is forgotten.....

1. Absolutely

2. Just like before

3. There are some problems, if U know

4. Pay to play, pay to win :fish_haloween:

5. :crab: Money money money

6. :Smile_amazed: You're joker

7. Little wrong, T2 to T4 :cap_cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
398
[-ISO-]
Member
1,152 posts
7,775 battles
14 hours ago, Skarhabek said:

7. The T8 and below is forgotten.....

Agreed. The way Wargaming treat their ships between tiers are getting radically different. You look at Krasny Krym and other Russian or other nations premium at low to mid tier. Most of them are worse if not equal to their tech tree counterpart until you reach T9 and T10 where everything is oppositely imbalanced and pure chaos. Also not to mention about their lack of interest towards Scenario and its playerbase.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,066
[TLS]
Member
5,849 posts
24,614 battles

What is winrate? The thing I am chasing now is an excuse to abandon game permanently.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,412
[SMOKE]
Member
4,459 posts
24,786 battles

what this game need is proper CL / CA / CB split and the MM should arrange accordingly, and that for all nation, not just USS or IJN , and almost all DD / CL need to had their guns / torps tweaked to reflect game now play at the range as it is and exclusion zone as they are ( planes, Radar etc etc ... ) , CAP ( Combat Air Patrol ) is the single most needed AA tuning .. Priority Sector AA of all light ships should reflect their ease of doing so and speed ( they should get the 50% bonus and super fast 5 sec prep ) CV should actually got less AA on Sector change ( the deck actually block AA from side to side )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×