Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
IJN_Katori

Odin HP Debuffed (Bullcrap Alert)

52 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

704
[LBAS]
Member
3,021 posts
14,392 battles

ST, changes to test ships and Devonshire

renderTimingPixel.png
 

French destroyer Marceau, Tier X:

  • Main battery reload time increased from 3.5 to 4.0 s;

  • Torpedo tube reload time increased from 120 to 150 s.

  • Ballistics were changed. Now her shells will need more time to travel the same distance: firing at a range of 7 km, instead of 4.2 seconds, a shell will take 4.67 seconds to reach its target. At a range of 11.4 km, instead of 8.13 seconds, it will take 9.85 seconds.

The destroyer was too strong, especially at long range.

European destroyer Klas Horn, Tier IV:

  • Turret traverse speed reduced from 10 to 8 degrees per second;

  • Torpedo tube reload time increased from 55 to 59 s.

European destroyer Visby, Tier V:

  • Turret traverse speed reduced from 10 to 8 degrees per second;

  • Torpedo tube reload time increased from 55 to 59 s;

  • Main battery reload time increased from 5.5 to 6.5 s.

European destroyer Västerås, Tier VI:

  • Turret traverse speed reduced from 10 to 8 degrees per second;

  • Torpedo tube reload time increased from 55 to 59 s;

  • Main battery reload time increased from 5.5 to 6.5 s.

European destroyer Östergötland, Tier IX:

  • Torpedo tube reload time increased from 90 to 100 s;

  • Main battery reload time increased from 2 to 2.3 s.

The combination of their effective torpedoes and the parameters of their main caliber guns made European destroyers too strong for their tiers.

European destroyer Halland, Tier X:

  • Mid-range AA zone's range reduced from 5 to 4 km

  • Continuous damage of the mid-range AA zone increased from 256 to 263 damage per second

  • Continuous damage of the long-range AA zone increased from 140 to 144 damage per second

European destroyer Småland, Tier X:

  • Mid-range AA zone's range reduced from 5 to 4 km;

  • Parameters of the "Engine Boost" consumable are changed:

    • Number of charges increased from 2(3) to 3(4);

    • Reload time reduced from 180(120) to 150(100) s;

    • Action time reduced from 120 to 60 s;

    • Maximum speed bonus increased from +8% to +30%. The ship's maximum speed with the activated consumable will be 45.3 kt.

Changes to Småland's and Halland's AA are carried out due to them previously having incorrect parameters.

The destroyer received a unique "Engine boost" consumable, which significantly increases its speed for a short period of time. It will increase Småland's efficiency in fighting for key areas and, in case of danger, will allow her to disengage quickly.

Japanese battleship Yashima, Tier X:

  • Secondary armament firing range reduced from 7 to 6 km;

This change is an adjustment of the ship based on internal testing.

British cruiser Cheshire. Tier VIII:

  • Main battery reload time increased from 11.5 to 12.5 s;

  • Detectability ranges were increased:

    • By ships, from 11.9 to 12.1 km;

    • By planes, from 7.39 to 7.51 km;

    • After firing main guns in smoke, from 7.36 to 7.5 km.

The latest changes to Cheshire made her too efficient, that is why we are slightly increasing her detectability and reload time.

British cruiser London, Tier VI:

  • Continuous damage of the long-range AA zone reduced from 98 to 56 damage per second

  • Continuous damage of the mid-range AA zone increased from 77 to 84 damage per second

  • Continuous damage of the short-range AA zone increased from 130 to 140 damage per second

  • Number of explosions per salvo reduced from 4 to 2;

  • Damage within an explosion reduced from 1,260 to 1,120

British cruiser Devonshire, Tier VI:

  • Continuous damage of the long-range AA zone reduced from 95 to 53 damage per second

  • Continuous damage of the mid-range AA zone increased from 151 to 161 damage per second

  • Continuous damage of the short-range AA zone increased from 158 to 165 damage per second

  • Number of explosions per salvo reduced from 4 to 2;

  • Damage within an explosion reduced from 1,400 to 1,120

Changes to the AA defense of British cruisers are carried out due to them previously having incorrect parameters.

German battleship Odin, Tier VIII:

  • Number of Hitpoints reduced from 62,700 to 52,800.

During testing the ship appeared to be very efficient. We reduce Odin's number of hit points to balance her while saving her distinctive features.

Please note that the information in the Development Blog is preliminary and subject to change.

 

 

Okay Odin HP is BS, should i go to Russia and shoot the devs with a gun?

Edited by BIGCOREMKP0I
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,437
Member
4,662 posts
8,750 battles
3 minutes ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:

Every Torpedo tube reload time increased;

Pure BS.

 

3 minutes ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:

Mid-range AA zone's range reduced from 5 to 4 km

Why?

 

3 minutes ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:
  • Main battery reload time increased from 11.5 to 12.5 s;

Why? The ship has 6 guns. SIX.

 

3 minutes ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:

 During testing the ship appeared to be very efficient. We reduce Odin's number of hit points to balance her while saving her distinctive features.

A distinctive feature of ANY German BB is high HP pool. 52k is freaking LESS than Lyon, which is the T7 BB with the SMALLEST HP pool.

Edited by Paladinum
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
695
[SMOKE]
Member
1,905 posts
15,910 battles

all this look to me the just care about pampering their beloved CV ... and making sure every players sure to hate them more ..

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,175
[FORCE]
Member
2,297 posts
12,085 battles
11 minutes ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:

German battleship Odin, Tier VIII:

  • Number of Hitpoints reduced from 62,700 to 52,800.

During testing the ship appeared to be very efficient. We reduce Odin's number of hit points to balance her while saving her distinctive features.

That ship is supposedly an upgraded Scharnhorst, but WG made her hp pool smaller. BRILLIANT!

And whoever tested the ship must have exaggerated their feedback.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
704
[LBAS]
Member
3,021 posts
14,392 battles
2 minutes ago, Sir_Feather said:

That ship is supposedly an upgraded Scharnhorst, but WG made her hp pool smaller. BRILLIANT!

And whoever tested the ship must have exaggerated their feedback.

Whoever tested the ship should be Fired from the firing range.

Edited by BIGCOREMKP0I

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,437
Member
4,662 posts
8,750 battles
3 minutes ago, Sir_Feather said:

And whoever tested the ship must have exaggerated their feedback.

WG cherry picked that guy's feedback to make this BS change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,121
[-CAT-]
Member
2,260 posts
11,218 battles
12 minutes ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:

Whoever tested the ship should be Fired from the firing range.

Tester must be either biased or don't know how to play / use German BB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
704
[LBAS]
Member
3,021 posts
14,392 battles

I'm disgusted of this CIS Shit Supertesters who often [REDACTED] with the German Battleships

 

 

MOVE ON, THIS ISNT OPERATION BARABOSSA YOU SCUM RUSSIANS.

Edited by BIGCOREMKP0I
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,175
[FORCE]
Member
2,297 posts
12,085 battles
18 minutes ago, S0und_Theif said:

Tester must be either biased or don't know how to play / use German BB.

Nah if the tester don't know how to play German BB, the ship would have been buffed instead of nerfed.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,437
Member
4,662 posts
8,750 battles

On Reddit, a user posted that the displacement of the design for Odin is actually slightly smaller than Scharnhorst. 

But this is a freaking VIDEO GAME. Almost anything from real life should be a reference, not the be all and end all. WG definitely know that, and decided to put the ship in T8 anyway, and then reduce her HP pool to oblivion.

FFS WG :Smile-angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
704
[LBAS]
Member
3,021 posts
14,392 battles
1 minute ago, Paladinum said:

On Reddit, a user posted that the displacement of the design for Odin is actually slightly smaller than Scharnhorst. 

But this is a freaking VIDEO GAME. Almost anything from real life should be a reference, not the be all and end all. WG definitely know that, and decided to put the ship in T8 anyway, and then reduce her HP pool to oblivion.

FFS WG :Smile-angry:

RISE OF THE PUBLIC RELATION DISASTER 2.0

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
684
[SALT]
Member
2,028 posts
10,542 battles
59 minutes ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:

Odin nerf is UNACCEPTABLE, this is the last straw!

7ee7f93a4f.png

Ok Ok, you can take it

jezz...........

  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,175
[FORCE]
Member
2,297 posts
12,085 battles
11 minutes ago, Paladinum said:

On Reddit, a user posted that the displacement of the design for Odin is actually slightly smaller than Scharnhorst. 

But this is a freaking VIDEO GAME. Almost anything from real life should be a reference, not the be all and end all. WG definitely know that, and decided to put the ship in T8 anyway, and then reduce her HP pool to oblivion.

WG knew that, and that's why Kremlin has bigger hp pool than GK although GK has the biggest displacement (for a BB). Funny thing is; Montana has smaller HP pool than Yamato despite also having bigger displacement.

 

WG's idea of setting ship's hp pool is as questionable as the guy who made imperial measurement units.

Edited by Sir_Feather

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
684
[SALT]
Member
2,028 posts
10,542 battles
8 minutes ago, Sir_Feather said:

WG knew that, and that's why Kremlin has bigger hp pool than GK although GK has the biggest displacement (for a BB). Funny thing is; Montana has smaller HP pool than Yamato despite also having bigger displacement.

No, Kremlin is Project 24 Battleship. while GK is based on H-41

48b1afca8a.png

 

You can see Full load Displacement for Kremlin (Project 24) is 81.150 - while GK (H-41) is 76,000 Ton - and Yamato is 71,600 Ton

nb : also Project 23 is Sov Soyuz

Edited by humusz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
70 posts
3,013 battles

Oh no we made a semi strong German ship quick nerf it before before Putin hears what we did. 

1705536428_imshocked.gif.8b043e309ad238421dc58830980b8ead.gif

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,437
Member
4,662 posts
8,750 battles
3 minutes ago, Der_Wustenfuchs said:

Oh no we made a semi strong German ship quick nerf it before before Putin hears what we did. 

Everyone complains about CVs being annoying, DDs being overwhelmed in this meta, Russian ships OP,...

And apparently not enough complaints about German ships being scheiße.

Edited by Paladinum
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
70 posts
3,013 battles
Just now, Paladinum said:

Everyone complains about CVs being annoying, DDs being overwhelmed in this meta, Russian ships OP,...

And apparently not enough complaints about German ships being utter scheiße.

well i guess its just a small complaint compared to the rest of the pile of scheiße we are dealing with lately 

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
338 posts
6,754 battles
1 hour ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:

 

Okay Odin HP is BS, should i go to Russia and shoot the devs with a gun?

Try doing it in their Anchors Away events. They're going to host it soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
878
[LBAS]
Member
1,776 posts
3,485 battles

Shit, i want Odin so much, ...

 

Okay its time to stop playing because they nerf our Halland

 

And what the heck with marceau torpedo nerf????

 

That its.....

 

I am go back to tree if savior

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
329
[-ISO-]
Member
1,059 posts
6,286 battles
2 hours ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:
  • Number of Hitpoints reduced from 62,700 to 52,800.

During testing the ship appeared to be very efficient. We reduce Odin's number of hit points to balance her while saving her distinctive features.

That's a bloody almost 10k of HP reduced. Damn. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
695
[SMOKE]
Member
1,905 posts
15,910 battles
On 2/7/2020 at 11:34 PM, Skarhabek said:

Shit, i want Odin so much, ...

 

Okay its time to stop playing because they nerf our Halland

 

And what the heck with marceau torpedo nerf????

 

That its.....

 

I am go back to tree if savior

Is that not very clear, no , no DD are to be allowed to be consistent effective no, no DD should be allowed to be able to perform , not against our pampered Big Guns, no not against our Pampered CV ( oh - check out that British CA AA nerf also ) , basically they are driving all DD and CL ( and even some CA ) players away from the game or making us to do the obvious, to abuse he game mechanism cause that would be the only way we can actually made the ship work ( and you can bet players will ) .. Ok so no more working torpedo, great let's put all the gun's upgrade there, we will just had to be even more dekka dekka

Edited by Mechfori

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,437
Member
4,662 posts
8,750 battles
6 hours ago, Der_Wustenfuchs said:

well i guess its just a small complaint compared to the rest of the pile of scheiße we are dealing with lately 

But it has existed for a very long while. Like, what was the last time German DDs exclusively got buffed? How often to you see any German DDs in PvP? Or even cruisers?

Edited by Paladinum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,175
[FORCE]
Member
2,297 posts
12,085 battles
3 hours ago, Paladinum said:

But it has existed for a very long while. Like, what was the last time German DDs exclusively got buffed? How often to you see any German DDs in PvP? Or even cruisers?

Not really a buff, but T-61 is still claimed to be too OP for a T6 DD by some numbnuts. I mean seriously, that's only 1 OP ship for a nation. Other nations have at least 2 OP ships. And any French DD with reload booster can outgun T-61 easily, especially because German DDs eat AP easier due to their thicker hulls.

Edit:

No I don't call Tirpitz OP. Even Bismarck can beat it by staying away from Tirpitz torp range.

Edited by Sir_Feather

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×