Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
PGM991

if you could change the game, what are you gonna change?

52 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

501
[LBAS]
Member
1,554 posts

I know it's impossible 

but I can't help but think that 'if' I can I'll do this and that etc

 

1. remove detonation.

2. no more permanent damage of module (secondary gun, AA, main gun, torpedo etc) all will be fixable.

3. Radar will require line of sight

4. remove CV  plane will have flight time limit to simulate fuel consumption

      - will be a CV skill 'heavy load out' increase damage alpha but reduce flight time, 'light load out' reduce damage alpha but increase flight time.

      - 'high ceiling' consumable allow plane to fly above AA range but reduce air detection of enemy surface ship by 50%

5. concealment overhaul

     - every ship concealment WILL directly relative with ship size (length and height)

6. detection overhaul

     - ship movement speed will effect ship detection, concealment value show in port are base with ship 'sit still'

     - faster ship move it detection will bloom wider compensate by dispersion of enemy fire will increase significantly (like shooting without lock on)

     - slower ship move, the less it detection but will have penalty by enemy dispersion will reduce significantly (pin point accuracy)

7. torpedo detection will reduce to 1 kilometer

     - skill vigilance will +1 kilometer to torpedo detection (can stack)

     - 'target acquisition' upgrade will +1 kilometer to torpedo detection (can stack) + negate dispersion penalty from shooting fast moving target

     - make a 'hard choice' for player, if you built your ship for stealth, you risk eating torpedo, if you built ship to safely from torpedo you'll have to throw away stealth build.

8. each class will have it's own skill tree

 

-------------------------------------

 

just thinking for fun...

Edited by PGM991
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
647
[GS]
Video Contributor, Beta Tester, Clantest Coordinator
2,800 posts
13,924 battles

Bring RTS back with unlimit planes

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,613
Member
4,944 posts
8,860 battles

You forget to put in

"This thread is made by a DD main"

 

11 minutes ago, Onlinegamer said:

Bring RTS back with unlimit planes

:fish_cute_2: 

Edited by Paladinum
  • Funny 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
647
[GS]
Video Contributor, Beta Tester, Clantest Coordinator
2,800 posts
13,924 battles
10 minutes ago, MatterCore said:

release Kitakami

"Yuro wants to challange" 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,383
[LBAS]
Modder, Member
6,680 posts
41,631 battles
Just now, Onlinegamer said:

"Yuro wants to challange" 

 

Just now, RalphTheTheatreCat said:

And original cheatland.imageproxy.php?img=&key=ccdef9bf6e307a5e

 

DSoS7yCX0AA3j0R.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,863
[TLS]
Member
4,251 posts
20,400 battles
24 minutes ago, Onlinegamer said:

Bring RTS back with unlimit planes

Agree.

 

23 minutes ago, Paladinum said:

You forget to put in

"This thread is made by a DD main"

 

:fish_cute_2: 

So obvious. If the "realistic radar overhaul" is present, then we must have a realistic DD simulation. One salvo from BB will cripple DD to death. Period. Just like "reality".

19 minutes ago, MatterCore said:

release Kitakami

Yes please.

All the aforementioned people got their rewards.

If I had to change the game, I would just do one thing: OVERHAUL MATCHMAKER. I do not ask for much.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,191
[CLAY]
Member
2,847 posts
12,666 battles

1. Overhaul Matchmaker

2. Remove Karma

3. Give PvE as much development focus as PvP

4. Get rid of Rubbish Burnheap

5. Never ever sell ships T9 or above for real money. FXP is borderline because you can convert it using real money

Edited by Grygus_Triss
  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,863
[TLS]
Member
4,251 posts
20,400 battles
1 minute ago, Grygus_Triss said:

3. Give PvE as much development focus as PvP.

I noticed PTS 0.8.10 bot AI is vastly superior and mimics human players in their withdrawal tactics. Live 0.8.10, this is not present.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
535
[LNA]
Member
2,050 posts
14,184 battles

remove ships i don't wanna fight , oh wait , should i remove players instead , or planes maybe lmao.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,191
[CLAY]
Member
2,847 posts
12,666 battles
3 minutes ago, RalphTheTheatreCat said:

Removal of name and shame rules for confirmed cheaters and botters.

Public removal of namer and shamers from community if they name and shame without accurate and verified evidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,938
[TDA]
ST Coordinator
5,648 posts
7,803 battles
2 minutes ago, Grygus_Triss said:

Public removal of namer and shamers from community if they name and shame without accurate and verified evidence.

Weegee should be doing the naming.  They should be doing it now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,191
[CLAY]
Member
2,847 posts
12,666 battles
2 minutes ago, RalphTheTheatreCat said:

Weegee should be doing the naming.  They should be doing it now.

That’s all good then. I just worry when we give certain rights to certain members of our community.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
311
[LBAS]
Beta Tester
875 posts
5,777 battles
4 分前、RalphTheTheatreCat の発言:

Weegee should be doing the naming.  They should be doing it now.

WG: Bo..Scripted players have human rights, despite they might not be human.

On topic:

one thing on MM, 1 CV per team for all tier.

Edited by spixys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,863
[TLS]
Member
4,251 posts
20,400 battles

The naming and shaming issue isn't that simple. It is just that in some places *cough*US/Europe*cough*Austhatfollowsthem*cough* that the issue of "cyberbullying" is being taken so seriously that they mandate rules to prevent that sort of behaviour. This is more of a legal issue rather than a company policy.

PS. I congratulate my fellow thread derailers for derailing this thread into a tangental discussion in so few posts. Well done!

Edited by dejiko_nyo
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,938
[TDA]
ST Coordinator
5,648 posts
7,803 battles
1 minute ago, dejiko_nyo said:

The naming and shaming issue isn't that simple. It is just that in some places *cough*US/Europe*cough*Austhatfollowsthem*cough* that the issue of "cyberbullying" is being taken so seriously that they mandate rules to prevent that sort of behaviour. This is more of a legal issue rather than a company policy.

There is a vast difference between bullying and a company exposing people who have actively breached their EULA. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
338 posts
6,754 battles
3 minutes ago, RalphTheTheatreCat said:

There is a vast difference between bullying and a company exposing people who have actively breached their EULA. 

"B-BUT MUH HURT FEELINGS!!! I DEMAND MY SAFE SPACE!!!!"

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,863
[TLS]
Member
4,251 posts
20,400 battles
1 minute ago, Ryuuoh_DeltaPlus said:

"B-BUT MUH HURT FEELINGS!!! I DEMAND MY SAFE SPACE!!!!"

^ This is the reason.

 

6 minutes ago, RalphTheTheatreCat said:

There is a vast difference between bullying and a company exposing people who have actively breached their EULA.  

Whilst a minority of us understand the differences, our "lawmakers" that are pandered by interest groups don't care about the differences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
774
[O7]
Member
2,675 posts
17,680 battles

I would give all the developers a small bonus each day if they could maintain a 50% wr for the day. Basically I want them to know what it's like to be a player facing bad mm.

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,613
Member
4,944 posts
8,860 battles

1. Buff Change German ships so they are competitive in the current crappy meta.

2. Overhaul MM. 3-4 radar ships on one team but 0 on the other is dumb as freak.

3. Bring back RTS CVs but with the changes I suggested.

3. DDs take only 10% damage from aircraft weapons, cruisers (CRs) 33% and super cruisers 50%. 
-> Forces CVs to target BBs which should always be their main targets.
-> Allows DDs and CRs to be more aggressive in teamplay.
-> Makes BBaby crowd salty which I always endorse.

4. 

39 minutes ago, Grygus_Triss said:

 Get rid of Rubbish Burnheap

5. Buff Small-length to have thicker armor so 305+ mm guns can citadel it better. Also ban this ship from having GFCS Mod. 2.
The ship will not be absolutely fool-proof -> less hate -> absolute win-win!

6. See Point 1.

Edited by Paladinum
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,191
[CLAY]
Member
2,847 posts
12,666 battles
6 minutes ago, keskparane said:

I would give all the developers a small bonus each day if they could maintain a 50% wr for the day. Basically I want them to know what it's like to be a player facing bad mm.

How about giving developers more decision making power instead of the marketing division?

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×