Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
appoclyse

Submarine Submarine SUBMARINE

62 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

103
[TLS]
Member
231 posts
7,830 battles

Well, here it come. The biggest controversy topic ever after CV REEEEEEWork. ( and maybe even bigger than all the controversies in history of WG decision )

I encourage as same time worry  about WG meta and how this work gonna affect the outcome of this game. While it can be enjoyable, the state we play in that test Op in Halloween is for some too bored because how that operation work. How this gonna affect the meta is quite a question as same time as all the surface ships. Currently, the game 100% design for surface engaging and except torps is underwater object only, most of the time you will use Main Battery as mean to deal major dmg to each others. If subs in game, we will and definitely get a complete overhaul of current system to add the underwater interaction. That mean surface ships will be adding more roles to actually counter this class.

This is a big project and I mean BIG because it take and require a thoughtful and listen to communities to actually tweak this class since we all know our history with submarines ( add submarines history related guys ,>_> ) . If maybe, and I mean WG introduce this class as a new page of WOWS, I will gladly join but for now, doubtful of WG choice in design this. 

:cap_yes::cap_popcorn:

 

Edited by appoclyse
  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
103
[TLS]
Member
231 posts
7,830 battles
2 minutes ago, Paladinum said:

Way more balance-able than CVs.

Maybe they will add depth charge for CVs too ? That would be interesting. :fish_cute_2:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,362 posts
5,741 battles
1 minute ago, appoclyse said:

Maybe they will add depth charge for CVs too ? That would be interesting. :fish_cute_2:

I once joked with someone also from China in the Chinese-speaking subforum that maybe WG can make a anti-sub focused CV split.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
103
[TLS]
Member
231 posts
7,830 battles
35 minutes ago, Project45_Opytny said:

I once joked with someone also from China in the Chinese-speaking subforum that maybe WG can make a anti-sub focused CV split.

One class to rule them all >_>

WOOOOOOOOOOO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
82
[KMS-A]
Member
224 posts
5,478 battles

CVs should be allowed to adjust flight height, limited by timing, to avoid AA (but not fighters), the same as submerged submarine

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
172
[LGND]
Member
489 posts
12,407 battles

incoming disaster balance 2.0....
i wonder how many people will change side from hype for submarine to rant because subs is unbalance ........ :Smile_trollface:
 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,700
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
4,266 posts
18,664 battles

New consumable for USN.

What? You think USN didn't have ASW helos in WWII?

Neither did WWII subs travel at 30 knots submerged.

FOR THE BALANS!

1l-MH-60R.jpg

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,700
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
4,266 posts
18,664 battles
1 minute ago, Stormcloak said:

We need the Apache consumable as a countermeasure! 

08b.jpg

To (mis)quote John Wayne: "Well Pilgrim, if you saw it, it ain't an Apache".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,700
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
4,266 posts
18,664 battles

But in all seriousness...

At first glance my suggestion is - Reduce submarine submerged speed and increase their submerged time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,570
[TLS]
Member
3,935 posts
19,987 battles
12 minutes ago, Max_Battle said:

But in all seriousness...

At first glance my suggestion is - Reduce submarine submerged speed and increase their submerged time.

Vlcsnap-2013-10-10-11h05m21s27.thumb.png.47c58591d8aa3825ff4fbf8013e87379.png

No. Should be faster submerged.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,321
Member
4,516 posts
8,621 battles
2 minutes ago, dejiko_nyo said:

Vlcsnap-2013-10-10-11h05m21s27.thumb.png.47c58591d8aa3825ff4fbf8013e87379.png

No. Should be faster submerged.

All ARP ships can go underwater.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,700
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
4,266 posts
18,664 battles
1 minute ago, dejiko_nyo said:

Vlcsnap-2013-10-10-11h05m21s27.thumb.png.47c58591d8aa3825ff4fbf8013e87379.png

No. Should be faster submerged.

I stand corrected.

This is obviously a historically accurate source and we know how important historical accuracy is to Wargaming.

I feel a bit silly now.

Well played sir.

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,700
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
4,266 posts
18,664 battles
1 minute ago, Paladinum said:

All ARP ships can go underwater.

Well in that case, I already have a submarine in my fleet.

Waaaaait a sec, she won't go down... SHE WON'T GO DOWN!

If there is one thing I won't stand for it's a pretty blue haired anime girl who won't go down when I tell her too.

World of Warships Screenshot 2019.08.22 - 13.34.57.33.png

  • Funny 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,570
[TLS]
Member
3,935 posts
19,987 battles
3 minutes ago, Paladinum said:

All ARP ships can go underwater.

Except that the surface ones have slower submerged speeds.

Now, I cannot wait for the skin mod for second best sub waifu: 2501-chan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
617
[SLAVA]
Video Contributor, Beta Tester, Clantest Coordinator
2,754 posts
13,654 battles

which is mean Phly will come back yay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,321
Member
4,516 posts
8,621 battles
3 hours ago, Max_Battle said:

Well in that case, I already have a submarine in my fleet.

Waaaaait a sec, she won't go down... SHE WON'T GO DOWN!

If there is one thing I won't stand for it's a pretty blue haired anime girl who won't go down when I tell her too.

Give Takao Klein field and we have a deal.

And please stop giving her absurd orders, Max.

 

3 hours ago, dejiko_nyo said:

Now, I cannot wait for the skin mod for second best sub waifu: 2501-chan.

The funny thing is there are literally only 2 sub mental models in the manga. And I don't care about either.

 

Playing submarines makes this emote even more prevalent: :Smile_hiding:  "Oh, what's going on here?" *surfaces* "Nope" *dives back down*

Edited by Paladinum
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,700
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
4,266 posts
18,664 battles
47 minutes ago, Paladinum said:

And please stop giving her absurd orders, Max.

Oh she will learn to obey.

48 minutes ago, Paladinum said:

Playing submarines makes this emote even more prevalent: :Smile_hiding:  "Oh, what's going on here?" *surfaces* "Nope"

:Smile_veryhappy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,321
Member
4,516 posts
8,621 battles

Would we be able to mount camos on subs?

I'd like to put Back to School on my U-boot and blast the lyric of "Yellow Submarine" (by the Beatles) in chat while playing.

"We all live in a nuclear submarine, nuclear submarine"

Edited by Paladinum
  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×