Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023  Read more... ×
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023  Read more... ×
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
Max_Battle

FF actual S...

26 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

5,241
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
6,552 posts
41,810 battles

Game crashed at start of op, came back to this...

Camo and flags burned, penalty applied.

Get f**ked.

Just get f**ked.

 

World of Warships Screenshot 2019.06.21 - 07.00.14.95.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
139
[HKACC]
Member
393 posts
4,597 battles

Maybe there's 0,00001 % players who like to do this thing ... start a game, doesn't like MM outcome, then just quit.

But then WG make a law that generalize 99,9999% of players who's exit because IRL important matter, disconnected due to server unstable, ctd & power outage, also kid who excess their gaming time and their parent force to turn off the game or the PC/laptop :Smile_trollface: ... to be the same as above rage quiter.

I mean WG should make some script to see this behavior. If during the match progress, no activity by the players, then it's incidental. But if a player quit then there's activity with another ship and enter new match, then it's deliberate action that should be punished.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,241
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
6,552 posts
41,810 battles
2 minutes ago, BigWaveSurfer said:

But Max!

You do look pretty in pink :Smile_trollface:

Awww shucks!

d60d6b06eac681082528f9915dcc5b40.jpg

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,241
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
6,552 posts
41,810 battles

Yeah it wasn't me...

Camo and flags back thanks.

No?

Well then I'll threaten to not spend money again.

No?

Well I'll just cop it sweet then?

Yes.

Yes Max, you fkn will and you'll like it.

nss.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
508
[LBAS]
Member
1,575 posts
7,415 battles

I wonder why WG can't made this penalty system able to separate player that actually AFK (connected but don't play, leaving keyboard to do something else) with player that actually disconnected.

I just got pink the other day because disconnected during cue time.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
163
[HMNZ]
Member
364 posts
5,531 battles
1 hour ago, Max_Battle said:

Yeah it wasn't me...

Camo and flags back thanks.

No?

Well then I'll threaten to not spend money again.

No?

Well I'll just cop it sweet then?

Yes.

Yes Max, you fkn will and you'll like it.imageproxy.php?img=&key=ccdef9bf6e307a5e

nss.jpg

ahaha, now wouldn't you think if its a problem that they know about, they could ignore the "pink" for an hour or so.... or am I a bit optimistic??

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
2,675 posts
17,680 battles
48 minutes ago, PGM991 said:

I wonder why WG can't made this penalty system able to separate player that actually AFK (connected but don't play, leaving keyboard to do something else) with player that actually disconnected.

I just got pink the other day because disconnected during cue time.

I think the question is why won't they? Because they could make it able to separate, they just choose not to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,600
Member
7,175 posts
11,884 battles
14 hours ago, keskparane said:

I think the question is why won't they? Because they could make it able to separate, they just choose not to.

Typical WarGambling. Can do it, should do it but won't do it.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
606 posts
4,580 battles
2 hours ago, MissMeMiss said:

Maybe there's 0,00001 % players who like to do this thing ... start a game, doesn't like MM outcome, then just quit.

But then WG make a law that generalize 99,9999% of players who's exit because IRL important matter, disconnected due to server unstable, ctd & power outage, also kid who excess their gaming time and their parent force to turn off the game or the PC/laptop :Smile_trollface: ... to be the same as above rage quiter.

I mean WG should make some script to see this behavior. If during the match progress, no activity by the players, then it's incidental. But if a player quit then there's activity with another ship and enter new match, then it's deliberate action that should be punished.

Agreed. The way WG implement AFK penalty indiscriminately is most unprofessional customer handling I have experienced in this industry (the absolute worst, not one of the worst).

There are many means to detect the reason for the user drop off. like capture the internet status, crash logs, server status etc..  and WG had never even attempt to try one.

I even had crash log immediately produced, right after the game crash. yet all they do is spending all the effort trying to blame my machine instead of anything else. and I have very sure it was their memory leak.

Edited by tsuenwan
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,611
[CLAY]
Member
4,214 posts
19,007 battles

It’s a weird system.

Do literally NOTHING for the whole battle.

Marked as teamkiller.

In a subsequent battle while pink. Scrape against another friendly ship, or accidentally, graze with main guns because A tall BB drove in front of your short DD. And remain pink for more games.

”Well because you are so dastardly as to not attack anything in a whole previous game, the fact that you now accidentally damage allies show that you are a despicable person who will be further punished even though the two crimes have nothing to do with each other.”

Of course, that is also how most detective shows work. Guy lies and steals, so CLEARLY he is also capable of murder (ok, in some cases he is, but in a lot of cases he isn’t).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
321
Beta Tester
890 posts
5,777 battles

I like how server have more difficulties when they have less people.:Smile_trollface:

Perhaps that is the time where staff doing "things" they normally won't do...

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3
[MBT]
Member
31 posts
14,338 battles

Happens to me as well this morning. Was trying to grab last 20 points for token, around 4.55am +8GMT. Enter Coop queue using Cossack, only to get booted to login screen at the same time queue enters me into the battle. Login again, just to found that WG generously award me with PINK suit, lasts for 3 battles.

Notification says that battle was DRAW.

Geez WG.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,241
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
6,552 posts
41,810 battles
1 hour ago, paskal said:

Happens to me as well this morning. Was trying to grab last 20 points for token, around 4.55am +8GMT. Enter Coop queue using Cossack, only to get booted to login screen at the same time queue enters me into the battle. Login again, just to found that WG generously award me with PINK suit, lasts for 3 battles.

Notification says that battle was DRAW.

Geez WG.

Yeah if all human players leave a battle but there are still bots on each side, it will auto draw.

"Leave a battle" - or lose connection for reasons....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
888
[RSM]
Beta Tester
2,102 posts
7,874 battles

Max, What Heresy is this? Very few Camo?

Poor Casual too.

Edited by LawrenceXVIII

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,241
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
6,552 posts
41,810 battles
39 minutes ago, LawrenceXVIII said:

Max, What Heresy is this? Very few Camo?

Poor Casual too.

Ha! I always use camo all the time!

Always gets used up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
888
[RSM]
Beta Tester
2,102 posts
7,874 battles
19 minutes ago, Max_Battle said:

Ha! I always use camo all the time!

Always gets used up!

Not Casual enough max.

Lemme show you mine.

20190622015056_1.thumb.jpg.033fb26a2ff715c5e8a1b8228fbcf558.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,241
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
6,552 posts
41,810 battles
19 minutes ago, LawrenceXVIII said:

Not Casual enough max.

Lemme show you mine.

20190622015056_1.thumb.jpg.033fb26a2ff715c5e8a1b8228fbcf558.jpg

GIVE CAMOS!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
888
[RSM]
Beta Tester
2,102 posts
7,874 battles
1 minute ago, Max_Battle said:

GIVE CAMOS!

Which one?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,241
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
6,552 posts
41,810 battles
18 minutes ago, LawrenceXVIII said:

Which one?

Yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
888
[RSM]
Beta Tester
2,102 posts
7,874 battles
Just now, Max_Battle said:

Yes.

Say no more FAMsual!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,858
[TDA]
Supertest Coordinator, Alpha Tester
6,451 posts
14,492 battles
On 6/21/2019 at 10:02 AM, keskparane said:

I think the question is why won't they? Because they could make it able to separate, they just choose not to.

Tell me how th game can tell the difference  between a legitimate disconnect and a player pulling the plug?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
2,675 posts
17,680 battles
18 minutes ago, RalphTheTheatreCat said:

Tell me how th game can tell the difference  between a legitimate disconnect and a player pulling the plug?

You can't. But why punish people for a 1 off? Now people who show a record of disconnects on the other hand. So you see by process of elimination you can ignore the 1 off situations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
606 posts
4,580 battles
5 hours ago, RalphTheTheatreCat said:

Tell me how th game can tell the difference  between a legitimate disconnect and a player pulling the plug?

 

Yes, I have explained this many times.

Operating system have network diagnostic capability build in. unplugged network and network segment problem reports very differently. you can which segment of the internet you can still connect to.  Like many MMO game engine It was built in the Bigworld engine which WOWS used.

If you look at the WOWS diagnostic report used ping and traceroute etc to figure out how are you can reach out (network hops) for the connection between the server and your machine.

Edited by tsuenwan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,858
[TDA]
Supertest Coordinator, Alpha Tester
6,451 posts
14,492 battles
1 minute ago, tsuenwan said:

 

Yes, I have explained this many time.

Operating system have network diagnostic capability build in. unplugged network and network segment problem reports very differently. you can which segment of the internet you can still connect to.  Like many MMO game engine It was built in the Bigworld engine which WOWS used.

If you look at the WOWS diagnostic report used ping and traceroute etc to figure out how are you can reach out (network hops) for the connection between the server and your machine.

They cant get Port UI to not lag.  You expect them to do this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×