Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023  Read more... ×
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023  Read more... ×
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
PanzerRunner

Let's Talk About Siegfried's Armament

13 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

96
[KMS-A]
Member
394 posts
576 battles

As you are probably aware now, Siegfried is a tier 9 German Battlecruiser that have 6 380mm guns, yes, 6 guns. The Siegfried is based on the O-Class Battlecruiser from Plan Z.

We know 6 guns is bad, BUT If they make this ship accurate, I think no one will mind the amount of guns it have. *cough* Gneisenau

With 26 seconds reload on a cruiser will you think this ship worth buying?

1_ohfZU4aK9v1StMgMDRc2sw-01.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,600
Member
7,175 posts
11,855 battles

Hey, it's the forum's certified resident German enthusiast - Paladinum! He already posted a thread about the ship. Here.

 

What he thinks:

- That reload time may not stay for very long if the accuracy proves to be ineffective. But the dispersion and sigma look mostly promising.

- He really doesn't like fact that WarGaming put a ship with 380 mm guns to be a "cruiser". Design 1047 would work better (3x3 283 mm), but from a historical standpoint, WG may want to reserve that ship for the Pan-EU instead (the Netherlands, to be precise).

- Other thoughts: he thinks that the turret traverse and speed are not good and need buffs.

- He's really, really into the name.

 

Edited by Paladinum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,739
[-JK-]
Member
6,887 posts
35,076 battles
37 minutes ago, Paladinum said:

Hey, it's the forum's certified resident German enthusiast - Paladinum! He already posted a thread about the ship. Here.

 

What he thinks:

- That reload time may not stay for very long if the accuracy proves to be ineffective. But the dispersion and sigma look mostly promising.

- He really doesn't like fact that WarGaming put a ship with 380 mm guns to be a "cruiser". Design 1047 would work better (3x3 283 mm), but from a historical standpoint, WG may want to reserve that ship for the Pan-EU instead (the Netherlands, to be precise).

- Other thoughts: he thinks that the turret traverse and speed are not good and need buffs.

- He's really, really into the name.

 

dragonslayer!

bathe in the heartbood of your foes to make your invulnerable 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
909 posts
11,049 battles

It will be a different approach that's for sure and I like that concept. 6 accurate guns with great alpha and overmatching capabilities sounds like a decent recepe. I would rather not see another conventional superceuiser tbh, considering I already have Alaska and Azuma is also available as a generic experience for those who wanna buy.

Personally, I'll be hoarding resources for: Siegfried, Hayate and Smolensk. Hopefully they'll come out in reasonable prices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,600
Member
7,175 posts
11,855 battles
14 hours ago, _TAMAL_ said:

I would rather not see another conventional superceuiser tbh

I would rather see a conventional light/heavy cruiser as a T9/10 freemium lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
909 posts
11,049 battles
5 hours ago, Paladinum said:

I would rather see a conventional light/heavy cruiser as a T9/10 freemium lol

Yeah that is so true though... WeeGee have been playing around with Supercruisers so mich that we forget their are also regular cruisers in the game!!:Smile_teethhappy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,600
Member
7,175 posts
11,855 battles
13 hours ago, _TAMAL_ said:

Yeah that is so true though... WeeGee have been playing around with Supercruisers so mich that we forget their are also regular cruisers in the game!!:Smile_teethhappy:

I f**king love my Salem and Hinden. Enjoy them waaaaaaaaaaaaaay more than Alaskagrad.

WarGaming, just uptier and gimmick Cleveland, Mogami, Hipper, etc. You guys do that ALL THE TIMES!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0
[16TH]
Member
1 post
9,200 battles

Actually,I think that his 6 guns will make it get the lower maxmium damage and the higer minimum damage in the averge data in WG's potato

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,600
Member
7,175 posts
11,855 battles
17 hours ago, Shifty_Panzer said:

Well at least it's a tier 9 premium, not tier 8

Yes, indeed. Probably the best thing about this ship.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
96
[KMS-A]
Member
394 posts
576 battles
4 hours ago, Paladinum said:

Yes, indeed. Probably the best thing about this ship.

There is something I just love with tier 9 in WoT and WoWs. Probably the most underrated tier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
132
[SPCTH]
Member
390 posts
15,224 battles

This ship is going to do what to a CV? or repel all planes? This brings nothing to the way the game is played. Just another ship to harass from the air. They should only bring out New CVs, these surface ships have no use anymore.

Edited by AxEyBoI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,600
Member
7,175 posts
11,855 battles
On 5/27/2019 at 8:04 AM, Shifty_Panzer said:

There is something I just love with tier 9 in WoT and WoWs. Probably the most underrated tier.

Yeah. I like some T9 ships more than the T10 for sure.

 

On 5/27/2019 at 1:27 PM, AxEyBoI said:

This ship is going to do what to a CV? or repel all planes? This brings nothing to the way the game is played. Just another ship to harass from the air. They should only bring out New CVs, these surface ships have no use anymore.

What are you saying? Why are you even here? Is this a CV thread?

Edited by Paladinum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×