Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
Robby_Hermanto

The Bias is Real

16 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

3,558
[REPOI]
[REPOI]
Member
6,779 posts
28,532 battles
1 hour ago, Robby_Hermanto said:

The image talk for itself...

DFAA multiplier

 

also, it's not the AA that makes the RUBBs overtly strong....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,221
Member
5,677 posts
9,487 battles

So because a WW2 BB design has better AA than a really late war cruiser, it's bias? :Smile_ohmy: Well then Iowa is bias AF because she has better AA than Hindenburg or Henri!

 

This thread may as well justify WeeGee nerfing the wrong places...

Everyone and their dogs: "Conqueror guns are too strong"
WeeGee: *nerf protection, but buff heal*

Everyone and their dogs: "Kreml and Slava guns are too strong"
WeeGee: *nerf AA*

Edited by Paladinum
  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,614
[CLAY]
Member
3,216 posts
14,151 battles
1 hour ago, Paladinum said:

So because a WW2 BB design has better AA than a really late war cruiser, it's bias? :Smile_ohmy: Well then Iowa is bias AF because she has better AA than Hindenburg or Henri!

 

This thread may as well justify WeeGee nerfing the wrong places...

Everyone and their dogs: "Conqueror guns are too strong"
WeeGee: *nerf protection, but buff heal*

Everyone and their dogs: "Kreml and Slava guns are too strong"
WeeGee: *nerf AA*

Everyone and their dogs: “Premium ship is too strong, please nerf”

WeeGee: *remove ship from sale*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
83
[DEVAS]
Member
183 posts
7,172 battles
2 hours ago, Paladinum said:

So because a WW2 BB design has better AA than a really late war cruiser, it's bias? :Smile_ohmy: Well then Iowa is bias AF because she has better AA than Hindenburg or Henri!

 

This thread may as well justify WeeGee nerfing the wrong places...

Everyone and their dogs: "Conqueror guns are too strong"
WeeGee: *nerf protection, but buff heal*

Everyone and their dogs: "Kreml and Slava guns are too strong"
WeeGee: *nerf AA*

If you examine the detail techical spec, the AA guns on Iowa are historical, so are those at Des Moines, Worcester, and so on.

What I want to emphasize about this is WG alter the technical spec to make these Russian ships to be stronger than her counterparts.

For fantasy ships like Republique, Großer Kürfust, Hindenburg, etc., I really don't mind for them to have a strong AA. The developer needs to make them competent to be a par with their adversaries.

But for some Russian ships, the historical spec were heavily altered to tune these ships to be competent over the others. I wrote on another post about Gangut AA guns, which historically had only one gun, but WG put her in game to have eight.

There are 2 purposes for me to write this thread:

1. To seek for other's opinion.

2. Wish WG to release them with their original technical spec data. Not altering them to be better than their adversaries. As if WG wish to buff these ships to be competent with others, WG can just buff "in game specs", like AA DPM, Sigma, HP, etc. without altering the historical technical spec.

Edited by Robby_Hermanto

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
83
[DEVAS]
Member
183 posts
7,172 battles
8 hours ago, drakon233 said:

DFAA multiplier

 

also, it's not the AA that makes the RUBBs overtly strong....

Yes AA is only one out of many points. You are right.

Let me just put one by one. One at a time. If I just write down all of it, the thread will going to be a novel long and nobody will read it to the end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
163
[HMNZ]
Member
364 posts
5,531 battles
20 minutes ago, Robby_Hermanto said:

But for some Russian ships, the historical spec were heavily altered to tune these ships to be competent over the others. I wrote on another post about Gangut AA guns, which historically had only one gun, but WG put her in game to have eight.

Imagine if WG was American owned, nothing would out-gun, out-run or out-burn an American ship, so I say whatever.

The only Russian ships I have, have been won in crates and I have enough other ships to keep me going for sometime. move on to the next drama, maybe Chinese BB?  :Smile_veryhappy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,558
[REPOI]
[REPOI]
Member
6,779 posts
28,532 battles
1 hour ago, Otago_F111 said:

Imagine if WG was American owned, nothing would out-gun, out-run or out-burn an American ship, so I say whatever.

The only Russian ships I have, have been won in crates and I have enough other ships to keep me going for sometime. move on to the next drama, maybe Chinese BB?  :Smile_veryhappy:

chinese essex premium 

*feel the salt of the CN server since they wont ever get it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
592 posts
1,666 battles

Consider the worst population down trend occuring currently in the Russian server.  All these could be WGs attempt to improve their RU population.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,221
Member
5,677 posts
9,487 battles
10 hours ago, Grygus_Triss said:

Everyone and their dogs: “Premium ship is too strong, please nerf”

WeeGee: *remove ship from sale*

Best nerf until WeeGee lootbox them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
559
[LNA]
Member
2,093 posts
15,375 battles
9 hours ago, drakon233 said:

chinese essex premium 

*feel the salt of the CN server since they wont ever get it

With the CN version still stuck on 0.7.x why the heck doesn't the game close or playerbase move to ASIA ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,558
[REPOI]
[REPOI]
Member
6,779 posts
28,532 battles
2 minutes ago, legionary2099 said:

With the CN version still stuck on 0.7.x why the heck doesn't the game close or playerbase move to ASIA ?

you know how there seems to be a recent surge of hackers/bots /trashtalkers like when SEA/KR merged servers?

 

i wonder why that is

Edited by drakon233

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
559
[LNA]
Member
2,093 posts
15,375 battles
Just now, drakon233 said:

you know how there seems to be a recent surge of hackers/bots /trashtalkers like when SEA/KR merged servers?

 

i wonder why that is

Yeah. You don't mean .... in the name of efficiency lol.

Speaking of bots, don't the heavy crack down really eff them up already ? Or somehow Chinese develop GoSu AI for WoWS lmao.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
754
[SALT]
Member
2,122 posts
10,571 battles
49 minutes ago, drakon233 said:

you know how there seems to be a recent surge of hackers/bots /trashtalkers like when SEA/KR merged servers?

 

i wonder why that is

there sure many bots around.

just 2 days ago from 8 match, 4 there is bot in them. one of them was Benson going reverse till the edge of the map while shooting forward non stop

what shitty code was that, can they at least going forward so can die quickly

Edited by humusz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,385
[MRI]
Member
3,786 posts
16,841 battles
6 hours ago, legionary2099 said:

Speaking of bots, don't the heavy crack down really eff them up already ? Or somehow Chinese develop GoSu AI for WoWS lmao. 

Nah they are not bots, they are just really dedicated players! At least according to WG... :Smile_teethhappy:

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×