83 [DEVAS] Robby_Hermanto Member 183 posts 7,213 battles Report post #1 Posted May 12, 2019 The image talk for itself... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,704 [REPOI] EULA_violator Member 6,865 posts 31,868 battles Report post #2 Posted May 12, 2019 1 hour ago, Robby_Hermanto said: The image talk for itself... DFAA multiplier also, it's not the AA that makes the RUBBs overtly strong.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
225 [BOTES] PunishedKAsual Member 611 posts 4,520 battles Report post #3 Posted May 12, 2019 >Kreml has good AA so its another case of Russian Bias Big thinky Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4,129 Paladinum Member 6,648 posts 11,231 battles Report post #4 Posted May 12, 2019 (edited) So because a WW2 BB design has better AA than a really late war cruiser, it's bias? Well then Iowa is bias AF because she has better AA than Hindenburg or Henri! This thread may as well justify WeeGee nerfing the wrong places... Everyone and their dogs: "Conqueror guns are too strong" WeeGee: *nerf protection, but buff heal* Everyone and their dogs: "Kreml and Slava guns are too strong" WeeGee: *nerf AA* Edited May 13, 2019 by Paladinum 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,358 [CLAY] Grygus_Triss Member 3,969 posts 16,968 battles Report post #5 Posted May 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Paladinum said: So because a WW2 BB design has better AA than a really late war cruiser, it's bias? Well then Iowa is bias AF because she has better AA than Hindenburg or Henri! This thread may as well justify WeeGee nerfing the wrong places... Everyone and their dogs: "Conqueror guns are too strong" WeeGee: *nerf protection, but buff heal* Everyone and their dogs: "Kreml and Slava guns are too strong" WeeGee: *nerf AA* Everyone and their dogs: “Premium ship is too strong, please nerf” WeeGee: *remove ship from sale* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
83 [DEVAS] Robby_Hermanto Member 183 posts 7,213 battles Report post #6 Posted May 13, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, Paladinum said: So because a WW2 BB design has better AA than a really late war cruiser, it's bias? Well then Iowa is bias AF because she has better AA than Hindenburg or Henri! This thread may as well justify WeeGee nerfing the wrong places... Everyone and their dogs: "Conqueror guns are too strong" WeeGee: *nerf protection, but buff heal* Everyone and their dogs: "Kreml and Slava guns are too strong" WeeGee: *nerf AA* If you examine the detail techical spec, the AA guns on Iowa are historical, so are those at Des Moines, Worcester, and so on. What I want to emphasize about this is WG alter the technical spec to make these Russian ships to be stronger than her counterparts. For fantasy ships like Republique, Großer Kürfust, Hindenburg, etc., I really don't mind for them to have a strong AA. The developer needs to make them competent to be a par with their adversaries. But for some Russian ships, the historical spec were heavily altered to tune these ships to be competent over the others. I wrote on another post about Gangut AA guns, which historically had only one gun, but WG put her in game to have eight. There are 2 purposes for me to write this thread: 1. To seek for other's opinion. 2. Wish WG to release them with their original technical spec data. Not altering them to be better than their adversaries. As if WG wish to buff these ships to be competent with others, WG can just buff "in game specs", like AA DPM, Sigma, HP, etc. without altering the historical technical spec. Edited May 13, 2019 by Robby_Hermanto Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
83 [DEVAS] Robby_Hermanto Member 183 posts 7,213 battles Report post #7 Posted May 13, 2019 8 hours ago, drakon233 said: DFAA multiplier also, it's not the AA that makes the RUBBs overtly strong.... Yes AA is only one out of many points. You are right. Let me just put one by one. One at a time. If I just write down all of it, the thread will going to be a novel long and nobody will read it to the end. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
163 [HMNZ] Otago_F111 Member 364 posts 5,531 battles Report post #8 Posted May 13, 2019 20 minutes ago, Robby_Hermanto said: But for some Russian ships, the historical spec were heavily altered to tune these ships to be competent over the others. I wrote on another post about Gangut AA guns, which historically had only one gun, but WG put her in game to have eight. Imagine if WG was American owned, nothing would out-gun, out-run or out-burn an American ship, so I say whatever. The only Russian ships I have, have been won in crates and I have enough other ships to keep me going for sometime. move on to the next drama, maybe Chinese BB? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,704 [REPOI] EULA_violator Member 6,865 posts 31,868 battles Report post #9 Posted May 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Otago_F111 said: Imagine if WG was American owned, nothing would out-gun, out-run or out-burn an American ship, so I say whatever. The only Russian ships I have, have been won in crates and I have enough other ships to keep me going for sometime. move on to the next drama, maybe Chinese BB? chinese essex premium *feel the salt of the CN server since they wont ever get it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
141 tsuenwan Member 605 posts 4,570 battles Report post #10 Posted May 13, 2019 Consider the worst population down trend occuring currently in the Russian server. All these could be WGs attempt to improve their RU population. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4,129 Paladinum Member 6,648 posts 11,231 battles Report post #11 Posted May 13, 2019 10 hours ago, Grygus_Triss said: Everyone and their dogs: “Premium ship is too strong, please nerf” WeeGee: *remove ship from sale* Best nerf until WeeGee lootbox them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
694 [LNA] legionary2099 Member 2,250 posts 17,742 battles Report post #12 Posted May 13, 2019 9 hours ago, drakon233 said: chinese essex premium *feel the salt of the CN server since they wont ever get it With the CN version still stuck on 0.7.x why the heck doesn't the game close or playerbase move to ASIA ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,704 [REPOI] EULA_violator Member 6,865 posts 31,868 battles Report post #13 Posted May 13, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, legionary2099 said: With the CN version still stuck on 0.7.x why the heck doesn't the game close or playerbase move to ASIA ? you know how there seems to be a recent surge of hackers/bots /trashtalkers like when SEA/KR merged servers? i wonder why that is Edited May 13, 2019 by drakon233 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
694 [LNA] legionary2099 Member 2,250 posts 17,742 battles Report post #14 Posted May 13, 2019 Just now, drakon233 said: you know how there seems to be a recent surge of hackers/bots /trashtalkers like when SEA/KR merged servers? i wonder why that is Yeah. You don't mean .... in the name of efficiency lol. Speaking of bots, don't the heavy crack down really eff them up already ? Or somehow Chinese develop GoSu AI for WoWS lmao. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
834 [SALT] humusz Member 2,213 posts 10,571 battles Report post #15 Posted May 13, 2019 (edited) 49 minutes ago, drakon233 said: you know how there seems to be a recent surge of hackers/bots /trashtalkers like when SEA/KR merged servers? i wonder why that is there sure many bots around. just 2 days ago from 8 match, 4 there is bot in them. one of them was Benson going reverse till the edge of the map while shooting forward non stop what shitty code was that, can they at least going forward so can die quickly Edited May 13, 2019 by humusz Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,954 [MRI] Thyaliad Member 4,322 posts 20,206 battles Report post #16 Posted May 13, 2019 6 hours ago, legionary2099 said: Speaking of bots, don't the heavy crack down really eff them up already ? Or somehow Chinese develop GoSu AI for WoWS lmao. Nah they are not bots, they are just really dedicated players! At least according to WG... 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
