Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
ACGtsukkomi_Poi

report this STplayer.he makes me sick.

39 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

22
[UMP45]
Super Tester
32 posts
6,314 battles

I am happy to play with everybody,but in chinese soical bbs(tieba),i see this post.I don't know why this guy's thinking.I know everybody want OP ships in this game,but STplayer job is give recommend and help development to banlance the game.I hear this guy is NA player?

this is my translation,and this post link&screenshot.

qq_pic_merged_1556438224321.thumb.jpg.510360bc67fd193e6486304a1e76c9db.jpg

[Image deleted]

translate:

We've try our best to keep this ship's data(average dameage) down,

and now the STplayer test this ships damage has gone up by 150000+.

 But sometimes, no matter what you do, you always meet like RNG's teammates.

(RNG is chinese LOL pro game club,RNG is very weak in LOL).

 

PS.and this guy comment on the CC UOcat upload video.

qq_pic_merged_1556439136147.thumb.jpg.25a516d9dbbc0ee7d2396d70f788c662.jpg

hey uocat,

let's talk about press down this AD data, or the ship will be debuff.

24 kilometers a round against Tilpitz 30, 000 DM,

17 kilometers a round against Montana 6 rounds of core.

By the time the ship didn't fly together with nine shells,

it would have averaged more than 150000 damage in game.

Hope WG give us answer.

[Text deleted]

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
305 posts
370 battles

VYou don't need to worry about OP surface sheep. As long as it remain surface pheasant, CV will always Smack it. Unless its a sheep with no fly zone, there is no need to worry.

 

Belfast and Kutozov is ridiculously OP because its also posses stronk AA. Basically sheep without weakness.

 

Also is that Russian BB? That thing will become OP even every supertester complain how OP is the ship 

 

2 minutes ago, yansuki said:

use this thread for reporting

 

Its not count as game violation or unsportmansheep behavior..... So well then.

The ST have a right to make biased opinion. But we also have a right to complain. So i think putting the thread on general discussion is the right choice.

 

Note : i like chaos so DO IT Bois!! 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
263
[LUOMU]
Super Tester_
1,421 posts
14,104 battles
1 hour ago, Akyamarukh said:

VYou don't need to worry about OP surface sheep. As long as it remain surface pheasant, CV will always Smack it. Unless its a sheep with no fly zone, there is no need to worry.

 

Belfast and Kutozov is ridiculously OP because its also posses stronk AA. Basically sheep without weakness.

 

Also is that Russian BB? That thing will become OP even every supertester complain how OP is the ship 

 

Its not count as game violation or unsportmansheep behavior..... So well then.

The ST have a right to make biased opinion. But we also have a right to complain. So i think putting the thread on general discussion is the right choice.

 

Note : i like chaos so DO IT Bois!! 

 

I'll have to disagree. Super testers should, IMHO, play WiP ships with the best of their abilities. They should provide unbiased statistics.

Opinion can be biased, trash talk is part of the community. As human beings we cannot completely cleanse ourselves of biases.

But as a supertester, the first priority is to help the healthy development of the game. The actions described is, IMHO, absolutely immoral and unsportsmanlike. This kind of actions is unethical and should not be tolerated for a super tester.

I also consider Pobeda a bit too strong *in her current status*, and I'm also worried that I may never get to play such an exciting and empowering ship again, but my choice is stop playing her. I won't get myself spoiled, and I won't intentionally pollute statistics.

I love this game. I love the devs for their hard work. It's not just entertainment, it's also naval history. I sincerely hope that this game has a bright future and a long development life cycle. It's sad a fellow ST would do this kind of despicable behavior for personal gains.

 

PS: Please note that Work-in-Progress ships may change in the future, nothing is certain.

 

PPS: I can read Chinese and can help with the translation.

Edited by HMS_Swiftsure_08

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,619
Member
4,947 posts
8,867 battles
3 minutes ago, dejiko_nyo said:

I thought STs have an NDA regarding new ships similar to the CCs?

Depends on the ships I think. As all the new ships' stats are revealed on Dev Blog, I assume people can formulate their own opinions for those ships, even if they lack hand-on experience.

STs may even have stricter NDA than CCs IMO.

 

About the topic, the player with the bottom of the exp rank was just playing poorly. STs consist of all kinds of people, the good AND the bad. WG need that to see how any player of any skill level would perform in a new ship. It's normal. So the guy in question is just being salty. VERY salty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
143
[TDA]
Super Tester_
430 posts
10,635 battles
4 hours ago, dejiko_nyo said:

I thought STs have an NDA regarding new ships similar to the CCs?

CC's are allowed to stream, record, comment etc regarding the ships that they are testing. ST's cannot stream or record their testing, but we can take screen shots as long as we mark it correctly as Work In Progress. We can refer people to the Dev Blog if the player wants further information on the ship that they see an ST playing. Commenting and reviewing a ship isn't what ST is about, it's data gathering for WG to see how a ship/s performs.

Regarding the ST that the OP posted. He has to either be a CC or a Clan Tester, because if he is streaming a test ship and he's only an ST, then he's gone messed up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,384
[LBAS]
Modder, Member
6,680 posts
41,649 battles

report? too silly

Demand banning, ban ST for him forever

We dont need this kind of ST, nothing more than Decepticons, toxic, corrupted, liar . . .

Edited by MatterCore
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,407
[TDA]
[TDA]
Alpha Tester
2,287 posts
8,786 battles

This ST is only fooling himself by deliberately trying to keep the stats down.

The data that gets recorded shows his shots fired in the battle. Dispersion of shot for that ship is a known thing, so accuracy is not in doubt.

The heat map will also show his ship movements during battle, so if he is avoiding contact with enemy that will also show.

Devs reviewing the ship performance will just come to the conclusion that he is a bad shot or a noob.

'Oh look, he fired 45 shots and only got 1 hit.' or 'This guy only fired once here'.

 

Devs aren't stupid, that's why they're game programmers.

All this ST has managed to accomplish is his removal from the program.... WP

 

 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
272
[REPOI]
Member
1,342 posts

let him be..

He doesn't even come close to being 0.1% of the STs so what ever he is trying to do ain't gonna work as stats are taken from all the servers and I can say Our Server Alone has 100s of STs. now compare it to CCs, STs on all the 4 servers. Then take into account of hopefuls who are not given full ST status.


In the end WG is gonna have what they need but what will they do with it is their choice.. because we know their decision making and relying upon what they have been doing with the game won't be surprised if they release it as it is...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
4 posts
192 battles

I checked the original post and all comments, the STer DO PUT the WIP watermark, and he DO declared he is JOKING. so I do not know why you try to attack him. In addition, WG can check his stat to confirm he did what he said or not. Thank you

Edited by destroverPOI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
4 posts
192 battles
5 hours ago, AntifoulAwl said:

This ST is only fooling himself by deliberately trying to keep the stats down.

The data that gets recorded shows his shots fired in the battle. Dispersion of shot for that ship is a known thing, so accuracy is not in doubt.

The heat map will also show his ship movements during battle, so if he is avoiding contact with enemy that will also show.

Devs reviewing the ship performance will just come to the conclusion that he is a bad shot or a noob.

'Oh look, he fired 45 shots and only got 1 hit.' or 'This guy only fired once here'.

 

Devs aren't stupid, that's why they're game programmers.

All this ST has managed to accomplish is his removal from the program.... WP

 

 

 

I checked the original post and all comments, the STer do put the WIP watermark, and he do declared he is JOKING. so I do not know why this guy try to attack him. interesting

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
4 posts
192 battles
11 hours ago, MatterCore said:

report? too silly

Demand banning, ban ST for him forever

We dont need this kind of ST, nothing more than Decepticons, toxic, corrupted, liar . . .

I checked the original post and all comments, the STer do put the WIP watermark, and he do declared he is JOKING. so I do not know why this guy try to attack him. interesting

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
519
[AN-DO]
Member
680 posts
9,989 battles

@destroverPOI you know everybody can read the replies right? You don''t have to reply to every single post individually, because that comes across as a little odd, maybe even suspicious since your first three posts are exactly the same thing and in defense of a dodgy ST

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
4 posts
192 battles
28 minutes ago, blauflamme22 said:

@destroverPOI you know everybody can read the replies right? You don''t have to reply to every single post individually, because that comes across as a little odd, maybe even suspicious since your first three posts are exactly the same thing and in defense of a dodgy ST

youre right, but what I said is totally true

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
305 posts
370 battles
56 minutes ago, blauflamme22 said:

@destroverPOI you know everybody can read the replies right? You don''t have to reply to every single post individually, because that comes across as a little odd, maybe even suspicious since your first three posts are exactly the same thing and in defense of a dodgy ST

 

27 minutes ago, destroverPOI said:

youre right, but what I said is totally true

 

You can do multi quote instead, like what i did. Press quote and the choose another post to quote. Its better than doing multi post for one quote.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
629
[AN-DO]
Beta Tester
1,771 posts
5,853 battles

Supertesters are all stupid . But not all of them.. They just prefer Gloryhound. But this one on video is beyond me...

I dont know why WG accept stupid and wrong people when they are some flaws within it.

Edited by LawrenceXVIII

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,941
[TDA]
ST Coordinator
5,648 posts
7,803 battles
6 minutes ago, LawrenceXVIII said:

Supertesters are all stupid . But not all of them

Contradicting yourself. Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
629
[AN-DO]
Beta Tester
1,771 posts
5,853 battles
35 minutes ago, RalphTheTheatreCat said:

Contradicting yourself. Lol

Doesn't matter, you still fall regardless. Maybe falling rogue. You can't tell. They just Gloryhound over telling how feedback works.

Even i myself as a Beta Tester is already Fallen.

Edited by LawrenceXVIII

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,407
[TDA]
[TDA]
Alpha Tester
2,287 posts
8,786 battles
10 hours ago, AntifoulAwl said:

This ST is only fooling himself by deliberately trying to keep the stats down.

The data that gets recorded shows his shots fired in the battle. Dispersion of shot for that ship is a known thing, so accuracy is not in doubt.

The heat map will also show his ship movements during battle, so if he is avoiding contact with enemy that will also show.

Devs reviewing the ship performance will just come to the conclusion that he is a bad shot or a noob.

'Oh look, he fired 45 shots and only got 1 hit.' or 'This guy only fired once here'.

 

Devs aren't stupid, that's why they're game programmers.

All this ST has managed to accomplish is his removal from the program.... WP

 

 

 

 

5 hours ago, destroverPOI said:

I checked the original post and all comments, the STer do put the WIP watermark, and he do declared he is JOKING. so I do not know why this guy try to attack him. interesting

 

Nowhere in my post did I attack him.

-In one line I theorized that the devs may conclude he is a noob. That is the closest thing that I would call an attack. 

 

If, as you say,  the person in question has done nothing wrong, good.

Well done for clearing it up.... care to link it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,407
[TDA]
[TDA]
Alpha Tester
2,287 posts
8,786 battles
10 minutes ago, LawrenceXVIII said:

 Maybe falling rogue.

Ralph was rogue way before this game came along.

 

 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
629
[AN-DO]
Beta Tester
1,771 posts
5,853 battles
16 minutes ago, AntifoulAwl said:

Ralph was rogue way before this game came along.

 

 

No Shet. I am a fallen pre-closed-tester.

What bout you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,407
[TDA]
[TDA]
Alpha Tester
2,287 posts
8,786 battles
1 minute ago, LawrenceXVIII said:

No Shet. I am a fallen pre-closed-tester.

What bout you?

Me?..

I'm a noob.

 

...What's pre-closed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
629
[AN-DO]
Beta Tester
1,771 posts
5,853 battles
2 minutes ago, AntifoulAwl said:

Me?..

I'm a noob.

 

...What's pre-closed?

You could said i was once wanted to become a Beta Tester in Wot but turned down due to my age that time. Then i just joined in 2012 August.

Until i got into wows...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×