Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
Paladinum

It's Titanic, fams - News from Dev Blog #7

17 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,747
Member
3,675 posts
7,456 battles

Destructible terrain: bergs of ice.

https://medium.com/@devblogwows/icebergs-a4af5261f5ac?fbclid=IwAR1ZBlnN12hpNhFI1DlWkMjo_sG31r64iSnPZm_bLaKCLy_D481bx_E8b_A

 

French DD line

Another line of DDs that cannot cap, or prevent being seen under pressure. No Smoke.

8km torps, 75 knots speed. IJN DDs cry once more.

This line looks less and less promising by the day. Just gimme German CL line already.

https://medium.com/@devblogwows/french-destroyers-1cc22fdf5c87?fbclid=IwAR3vr2kpazIxBVUHd-lI8xl6dADZX0EyW8qLOA6BS2vi9lKl87fPbRK3Sf0

 

New premium ships

Only one of them I look forward to, Benham.

And yet the German crying tears of salt. I know I'm crying tears of salt, on the inside.

https://medium.com/@devblogwows/new-ships-9fab6b188e90?fbclid=IwAR0M7a62r2Fjp4LADn8wLlO5PjTsu3IDfcINb4AAwPAJLzwJXI9tl5h8GBw

 

Edited by Paladinum
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,209
[TDA]
[TDA]
Alpha Tester
2,116 posts
7,703 battles

Comrade, the last few months has brought nothing but discontent and frustration.

So we have used our time and money wisely to work on the latest thing to liven up the game and bring the players back. Something everyone wanted...

 

- Icebergs you can shoot.

 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,747
Member
3,675 posts
7,456 battles
24 minutes ago, AntifoulAwl said:

- Icebergs you can shoot.

You can always shoot at bergs of ice. Only now some are destructible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
62
[EX0]
Member
342 posts
17,233 battles
3 hours ago, Paladinum said:

Destructible terrain: bergs of ice.

This was a feature taunted since alpha. so many years, i guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,209
[TDA]
[TDA]
Alpha Tester
2,116 posts
7,703 battles
8 hours ago, Paladinum said:

You can always shoot at bergs of ice. Only now some are destructible.

You're right. I should have added 'and rek'.

BTW, I wonder if chunks of ice will bob around in the water after said destruction, or if they will defy physics and sink or disappear?

-another thought, HE or AP for ice?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,560
[TDA]
Super Tester
5,202 posts
6,234 battles
1 hour ago, AntifoulAwl said:

You're right. I should have added 'and rek'.

BTW, I wonder if chunks of ice will bob around in the water after said destruction, or if they will defy physics and sink or disappear?

-another thought, HE or AP for ice?

WG devs thinking about how to take players minds of the CV trainwreck.  Diversion Tibor.   Yes Yuri.  Diversion.

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,747
Member
3,675 posts
7,456 battles

From the Slava article:

Quote

gun calibres of 457 mm vs 406 mm have a large difference in gameplay and armor penetration

And YET Conqueror with 419 and 457 with DIFFERENT gun layouts are on the same ship.

Z-23 has this feature as well. This is a stupid argument.

 

Although they said this later:

Quote

In the future, we plan to make similar separation for other ships with similar differences in the game.

Conqueror and Z-23 too? Making it so that 457 Conqueror is an EQUAL to 419?

Let's not forget, Monarch and KGV share the SAME hull (with 2 minor differences, one being bow/aft plating of all T8 BBs), same main gun range as well.

Mogami 203 is just an T8 Ibuki, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,326 posts
12,013 battles
3 hours ago, RalphTheTheatreCat said:

WG devs thinking about how to take players minds of the CV trainwreck.  Diversion Tibor.   Yes Yuri.  Diversion.

this is very true....

  • 0.8.0's hot fix (damage control 1)
  • Ranked, For them unicum players to divert their minds towards competitive where there are no CVs(Damage control 2)
  • GC's Nerf (damage control 3)
  • Alaska's Release at 1Mil free xp and ending up being just okay (Damage cont 4)
  • Now this (damage cont 5)

 

Also what is the point of Ice Bergs?? we know that there will always be that idiot who would shoot it first and make it go off just for the fun of it... And Oh Boy saying It is Tactical makes it more useless because there will always be someone who would try to use it yet someone from same team to sabotage it..

And it is not freaking simulation why the hell are we tilting the game towards real life simulation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,560
[TDA]
Super Tester
5,202 posts
6,234 battles
1 hour ago, Aaditya_AJ said:

Also what is the point of Ice Bergs

Trolling players that don't understand game mechanics.   Wait for the first USN  cruiser to park behind one and then it gets chipped away in front of them before they are obliterated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
468
[PATEN]
Video Contributor, Clantest Coordinator
2,556 posts
12,715 battles

Check list complete

 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,747
Member
3,675 posts
7,456 battles
7 hours ago, Aaditya_AJ said:

And it is not freaking simulation why the hell are we tilting the game towards real life simulation

I think people use bombs and demolition charges to destroy bergs of ice, not artillery shells. Also Icebreakers, not artillery shells.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,209
[TDA]
[TDA]
Alpha Tester
2,116 posts
7,703 battles
Just now, Paladinum said:

I think people use bombs and demolition charges to destroy bergs of ice, not artillery shells. Also Icebreakers, not artillery shells.

No one in real life blows up icebergs.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,209
[TDA]
[TDA]
Alpha Tester
2,116 posts
7,703 battles

YOU can be the first! :etc_red_button:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,747
Member
3,675 posts
7,456 battles
6 minutes ago, AntifoulAwl said:

No one in real life blows up icebergs.....

I thought about that, but maybe adventurers of the old days had to do that to go to the Antarctica or something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,209
[TDA]
[TDA]
Alpha Tester
2,116 posts
7,703 battles
44 minutes ago, Paladinum said:

I thought about that, but maybe adventurers of the old days had to do that to go to the Antarctica or something.

Blast your way to the south pole. :Smile_izmena:

Maybe that's what Scott should have done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×