Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
Paladinum

Alaska and Azuma, outrageous update

56 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Member
436 posts
5,332 battles

It is established that Alaska, Kronstadt, Stalingard, Azuma and even Graf Spee are not standard cruisers in the tech tree or standard BBs. That's why Kronstadt and Graf Spee, and previously, Alaska and Azuma have 45s fire duration. 60s is duration for BBs, and these are not BBs. 30s is duration for cruisers, and these are much more powerful than most other cruisers. Increasing fire duration to 60s without touching the other ships of the type is simply a bad move.

Make Alaska 700k free xp and I will probably forgive this BS.

Edited by Paladinum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
436 posts
5,332 battles
4 minutes ago, Stormcloak_Rebel said:

Or coal, since there's nothing worth spending coal on in the Arsenal rn, other than Musashi or Salem, IMHO. 

Must be much less than Krons/Musa or St. Peterburg will be L I T

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
139 posts
1,003 battles
4 minutes ago, Paladinum said:

Must be much less than Krons/Musa or St. Peterburg will be L I T

One can only hope! The long wait before I can muster enough FXP or coal makes me anxious! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
35 posts
1,487 battles

If Weegee finalize the ship with this change, the Stalingrad should get the same treatment. (Screw the "no nerfing premiums" policy, they've already broken multiple of their own rules anyway)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
436 posts
5,332 battles
8 minutes ago, SecretIdentity said:

If Weegee finalize the ship with this change, the Stalingrad should get the same treatment. (Screw the "no nerfing premiums" policy, they've already broken multiple of their own rules anyway)

But Russian Bias...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
275
[1NATN]
Member
474 posts
16,080 battles
31 minutes ago, Stormcloak_Rebel said:

Or coal, since there's nothing worth spending coal on in the Arsenal rn, other than Musashi or Salem, IMHO. 

Jean Bart...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
139 posts
1,003 battles
8 minutes ago, waichung1823 said:

Juan Fart? 

Pretty much, yeah. Have you ever seen a more miserable looking BB in a picture? Geez....its like a sea monster leapt out of the ocean and chewed off a part of its broadside :Smile_sceptic:
tumblr_pf5s6crt7z1ws46zho1_1280.jpg

Edited by Stormcloak_Rebel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
275
[1NATN]
Member
474 posts
16,080 battles
1 hour ago, MeglaGnome said:

Really?
 I have Musashi, Kronstadht and Jean Bart, and my favourite of the three is Jean Bart.

Agreed. It's easily the best of the three.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
436 posts
5,332 battles
8 hours ago, Stormcloak_Rebel said:

Pretty much, yeah. Have you ever seen a more miserable looking BB in a picture? Geez....its like a sea monster leapt out of the ocean and chewed off a part of its broadside :Smile_sceptic:
tumblr_pf5s6crt7z1ws46zho1_1280.jpg

What a valid reason to not buy a VIRTUAL ship :Smile_facepalm:

 

I don't play Russian ships because Russia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
377 posts
5,211 battles

 

Quote

Make Alaska 700k free xp and I will probably forgive this BS.

Y'all complain when WG puts out OP ships, then y'all complain when WG nerfs OP ships.

Y'all complain that there are too many OP ships in game, then y'all complain when WG prices OP ships out of reach of most people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
436 posts
5,332 battles
3 minutes ago, Rina_Pon said:

Y'all complain when WG puts out OP ships, then y'all complain when WG nerfs OP ships.

Y'all complain that there are too many OP ships in game, then y'all complain when WG prices OP ships out of reach of most people.

I'm not "Y'all".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HMASW]
Member
1,607 posts
37 minutes ago, Rina_Pon said:

 

Y'all complain when WG puts out OP ships, then y'all complain when WG nerfs OP ships.

Y'all complain that there are too many OP ships in game, then y'all complain when WG prices OP ships out of reach of most people.

I agree with you because I was just about to type something like this hehe

 

They whinge about OP ships, but they all have them in their own ports....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
80
[ANZAC]
Member
349 posts
12,041 battles
9 minutes ago, Paladinum said:

At this point I've stopped understanding what those two were on about.

Alaska is OP, sure, OP price tag.

Isn't it going to be 1meelion free XP? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×