Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
Paladinum

CV rework phase 3...

33 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Member
1,568 posts
5,943 battles

https://worldofwarships.asia/en/news/public-test/carrier-underwood/

Quote

 

Tech Tree

With reworked carriers comes a reworked tech tree. Let’s take a closer look:

Now aircraft carriers will be only at even tiers (tiers IV, VI, VIII, X). The tier gaps allow for more dramatic increase in effectiveness as you ascend: better performance at the new tier, more aircraft per squadron, better weapons and, more damage and opportunities to influence the battle. But, with great power comes great responsibility, and the price of making an error rises: enemy air defense will be stronger and maneuvering a large squadron between the gaps of anti-air fire will become increasingly difficult.

Of course, this change will affect the efficiency of the matchmaker. It will be faster to join battles with an aircraft carrier, because the players in this class will be concentrated on fewer tiers.

Changes will also affect the economy: the moving from tier to tier will be more expensive both in experience and in credits; however, it will be less than the old transition between two tiers. For example, the transition from the new tier VI to tier VIII will be, in total, cheaper than it is now.

 

Missed opportunity to put in game so many famous/historical CVs I think. Wasp, Yorktown, Hornet, Shinano, Unryu, Soryu, Illustrious, Malta, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
194
[TLS]
Beta Tester
853 posts
3,913 battles
1 hour ago, Paladinum said:

https://worldofwarships.asia/en/news/public-test/carrier-underwood/

Missed opportunity to put in game so many famous/historical CVs I think. Wasp, Yorktown, Hornet, Shinano, Unryu, Soryu, Illustrious, Malta, etc.

 

Hey , At least now they going to do it soon when CV mechanics is a gud thing.

Besides , UK CV too coming anyway. so...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
262
[LBAS]
Member
2,148 posts
10,432 battles
34 minutes ago, Max_Battle said:

Only CV captains will get a free reset....

don't lose hope, it'll probably will be reset all commander skills if the final round is successful

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
742
[HMASW]
Member
1,834 posts

so what will happen to the carriers independence and bogue, & the respective Japanese carriers, & the new English carriers they were going to bring out?

 

Ordrazz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
577
[CLAY]
Member
1,055 posts
7,814 battles
7 hours ago, Max_Battle said:

Only CV captains will get a free reset....

Well, the direction centre for catapult aircraft now only works for catapult fighter. On my Yamato, I use it specifically for 2 spotter planes. I hope I can get a reset for this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40
[LGND]
Member
288 posts
9,335 battles
3 hours ago, Grygus_Triss said:

What happens to Saipan and Kaga?

this what happen to Kaga and Saipan :))

okay.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
577
[CLAY]
Member
1,055 posts
7,814 battles
20 minutes ago, Gesterbein said:

this what happen to Kaga and Saipan :))

okay.JPG

Seems fair. Interesting to see how Saipan turns out, her major flavour was T9 fighters and AS. Which s now being more or less removed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2
[AUSRP]
Member
3 posts
4,044 battles
21 minutes ago, Gesterbein said:

this what happen to Kaga and Saipan :))

okay.JPG

Finally, the Tier 5,6,7 bully got moved to T8.

God wonders how many potential players got turned off this game by Saipan and Kaga?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40
[LGND]
Member
288 posts
9,335 battles
19 minutes ago, Entropy_Sky said:

Finally, the Tier 5,6,7 bully got moved to T8.

God wonders how many potential players got turned off this game by Saipan and Kaga?

not much i think some people still keep their premium.....
most people upset because they remove historical ship like hiryuu,Essex, and Taiho....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2
[AUSRP]
Member
3 posts
4,044 battles
3 minutes ago, Gesterbein said:

not much i think some people still keep their premium.....
most people upset because they remove historical ship like hiryuu,Essex, and Taiho....

I mean the potential players who would keep playing this game, but got bullied out of this game by OP Saipan and Kaga.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
288 posts
368 battles

now WG can sell Taiho, Hiryu, and other tech tree sheep as premium

THIS ALSO MAKE WG Easier to create british CV..... only 4 CV in total....

the rest can be sold as premium..... REALLY Geniuses...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40
[LGND]
Member
288 posts
9,335 battles
8 minutes ago, Entropy_Sky said:

I mean the potential players who would keep playing this game, but got bullied out of this game by OP Saipan and Kaga.

Saipan and Kaga ist not OP anymore, because u only control 1 squadron.....
Kaga OP because 10 torps
Saipan OP because T9 Fighters
both CV lost their unique/gimmick, and i dont know what will WG give for Kaga and Saipan for new CV gameplay....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2
[AUSRP]
Member
3 posts
4,044 battles
3 minutes ago, Gesterbein said:

Saipan and Kaga ist not OP anymore, because u only control 1 squadron.....
Kaga OP because 10 torps
Saipan OP because T9 Fighters
both CV lost their unique/gimmick, and i dont know what will WG give for Kaga and Saipan for new CV gameplay....

I am having trouble communicating with you.

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40
[LGND]
Member
288 posts
9,335 battles
7 minutes ago, Entropy_Sky said:

I am having trouble communicating with you.

well if u ask about how many player will keep playing this game after CV rework...... i dont know lol

Edited by Gesterbein

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
962
[CLAY]
Beta Tester
1,981 posts
11,780 battles
4 hours ago, Grygus_Triss said:

Well, the direction centre for catapult aircraft now only works for catapult fighter. On my Yamato, I use it specifically for 2 spotter planes. I hope I can get a reset for this.

Same on my Perth.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8
[DISF]
Member
21 posts
6,323 battles
30 minutes ago, Gesterbein said:

well if u ask about how many player will keep playing this game after CV rework...... i dont know lol

I think Entropy_Sky mean how many new players, who just reached T5, got bullied by Saipan and Kaga before the CV rework. I know this because I have Kaga and got reported from time to time since I keep deleting T5 ships.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
577
[CLAY]
Member
1,055 posts
7,814 battles
47 minutes ago, P_TuSangLui said:

I think Entropy_Sky mean how many new players, who just reached T5, got bullied by Saipan and Kaga before the CV rework. I know this because I have Kaga and got reported from time to time since I keep deleting T5 ships.

Yep, grade A CV logic right there. Get reported for deleting ships, get reported for not deleting ships. Get reported for continuously spotting that DD, get reported for NOT continuously spotting that DD.

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,568 posts
5,943 battles
19 minutes ago, Grygus_Triss said:

Yep, grade A CV logic right there. Get reported for deleting ships, get reported for not deleting ships. Get reported for continuously spotting that DD, get reported for NOT continuously spotting that DD.

Get reported simply for playing a CV: CV gameplay in a nutshell.

Much like DD play: continuously spotting a BB - get reported, NOT continuously spotting a BB - get reported.

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28
[CIWS]
Member
354 posts
18 hours ago, Paladinum said:

https://worldofwarships.asia/en/news/public-test/carrier-underwood/

Missed opportunity to put in game so many famous/historical CVs I think. Wasp, Yorktown, Hornet, Shinano, Unryu, Soryu, Illustrious, Malta, etc.

Yeah... RIP Essex ;-;

 

Press F to pay respects

 

1269170284_ScreenShot2018-09-27at12_28_39AM.thumb.png.a05b48e884f7fd3a4678a95ea93d2d2c.png

 

Disposed of but not forgotten! o7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
262
[LBAS]
Member
2,148 posts
10,432 battles
11 hours ago, Ordrazz said:

so what will happen to the carriers independence and bogue, & the respective Japanese carriers, & the new English carriers they were going to bring out?

 

Ordrazz

Carrier Split

 

Example Long Island -> Bogue 

or Akitsumaru -> Shinyo

Hermes or Argus

Edited by BIGCOREMKP0I

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
737
[MRI]
Member
1,832 posts
10,737 battles
On 11/22/2018 at 10:22 PM, Paladinum said:

https://worldofwarships.asia/en/news/public-test/carrier-underwood/

Missed opportunity to put in game so many famous/historical CVs I think. Wasp, Yorktown, Hornet, Shinano, Unryu, Soryu, Illustrious, Malta, etc.

WG is full of nonsense. And once again they have proven they have 0 idea what they are doing. Might as well replace CVs with airfields. That would solve the CV sniping issue at least.

Oh and their reasoning for not letting players directly control CVs. "We don't want players to get distracted!" Friggin hilarious. I propose that surface ships be unable to steer while in binocular view. Don't want to distract players from their aiming right? Also it would help level the skill-gap between unicums and potatoes. Brilliant idea. Please implement WG. :Smile_smile:

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1
[CHIPS]
Member
3 posts
9,242 battles

I used my blood and sweat to get the zuiho and hiryu. Now knowing that they will dispose of them, I'm just devastated. Even Taiho is being scrapped; a historically existing ship. We only have the Hakuryu which is a paper ship. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
127
Member
357 posts
4,365 battles
1 hour ago, Thyaliad said:

WG is full of nonsense. And once again they have proven they have 0 idea what they are doing. Might as well replace CVs with airfields. That would solve the CV sniping issue at least.

Oh and their reasoning for not letting players directly control CVs. "We don't want players to get distracted!" Friggin hilarious. I propose that surface ships be unable to steer while in binocular view. Don't want to distract players from their aiming right? Also it would help level the skill-gap between unicums and potatoes. Brilliant idea. Please implement WG. :Smile_smile:

 

I'm also a bit iffed at their reasoning as to why we can't control CVs directly while in squad control. Surface ships wise, people (especially those with poor situational awareness) often don't pay attention anyway when they are in binocular view (which leads to them sailing into friendlies, torpedoes, shells that citadel and/or delete them, or in rare occasions an enemy ship that they didn't realize was there), so why make it easy for them?

That being said, I think everyone here missed something on the bottom of the panel:

What will happen to the rest of the aircraft carriers, you ask? The answer: researchable ships that have not reassigned in the tech tree will be removed from game for now.

Our precious Essex, Hiryu, Taiho, etc etc etc aren't gone permanently, nor will they be permanently barred from the game (if they hadn't been added yet). They will be "shoehorned" in a tier they fit best (e.g Essex is likely to be tier 10, Hiryu tier 8, Taiho tier 10, Shinano tier 8, etc etc). 

I'm actually kinda surprised at my faith in WG even after being a personal witness to their shenanigans for 5 years.

Edited by TD1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×