Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
mr_glitchy_R

IJN BB line is kinda boring right now -_-

18 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

178
[-ISO-]
Member
699 posts
5,374 battles

I need something interesting added to this lines. Maybe BC line? I mean just look at it. Their game play are sort of mixed. after I play a BB then I moved to BC and then BB again. Which is inconsistent. Come on guys this line is the oldest in the game and they need an attention and revision from WG.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
160
[LYNMF]
Member
355 posts
11,068 battles

I rather WG focus on IJN DD's rather than IJN BB's.

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36
[REPOI]
Super Tester
112 posts
11,021 battles

Uh. No they don't? They're fine as is, and they, along with their USN counterparts do their job well. They generally don't have any gimmicks because they're already good, reliable ships without any cookie-cutter nonsense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
254
[KAMI]
Member
897 posts
9,390 battles
52 minutes ago, mr_glitchy_R said:

 Their game play are sort of mixed. after I play a BB then I moved to BC and then BB again. Which is inconsistent. 

Amagi is the only BC i know from the line

Is not far from a Nagato playstyle anyway

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
875
[MRI]
Member
1,992 posts
11,135 battles

While I don't mind a BB/BC line split, I don't think that is going to be very high on WG's priorities.

Besides if we are going to talk about inconsitency then look no further than the sub-branch of the IJN DDs.

Edited by Thyaliad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
317
[SH0T]
Member
901 posts
10,178 battles

I don't think any line needs a rework. Some ships could do with some balance changes sure but I think if they are going to invest considerable time into anything it should be the current radar meta and making that a bit more realistic in terms of balance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
178
[-ISO-]
Member
699 posts
5,374 battles
2 hours ago, OtomeprincessTH said:

Uh. No they don't? They're fine as is, and they, along with their USN counterparts do their job well. They generally don't have any gimmicks because they're already good, reliable ships without any cookie-cutter nonsense.

Yes they are. Nicely balanced and developed. Nvm. Maybe it's just me who bored with this game. But anyway. Why BB lines right now have some gimmicks in it?

 

2 hours ago, Gummilicious said:

Amagi is the only BC i know from the line

Is not far from a Nagato playstyle anyway

How about Myogi and Kongo?

And why tho? Why IJN DD is the line that needs some consideration? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,795
[SGC]
Super Tester
7,897 posts
8,258 battles
8 hours ago, mr_glitchy_R said:

And why tho? Why IJN DD is the line that needs some consideration? 

More like, IJN DD general playerbase needs a rework.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
179
[TF44]
Member
348 posts
3,063 battles
1 hour ago, icy_phoenix said:

More like, IJN DD general playerbase needs a rework.

Agree. IJN DD Torp boats are deadly in the right hands. That's one of the reasons I steer clear of Random Battles. At least until I can work out how to deal with them.

 

Edited by Bengal_Tiger23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
813
[CLAY]
Member
1,341 posts
8,494 battles

IJN BBs are fine. If they’re boring, it’s because they have a simple concept, which makes them good solid workhorses. I don’t think the line needs splitting in include BCs. Though willI agree that Amagi suffers from T10 matchmaking (as do most T8 ships).

The torp boats suffer due to power creep of other lines.

Yes, they are still good in the hands of those who know what they are doing, but there are a lot of counters nowadays. And almost every other DD can beat them in a gun fight, and radar gets them spotted, meaning they cannot always do what is expected of a dd, I.e. cap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36
[REPOI]
Super Tester
112 posts
11,021 battles
23 hours ago, mr_glitchy_R said:

But anyway. Why BB lines right now have some gimmicks in it?

A question we all want answers to. :cap_haloween:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34
[FFD]
Member
173 posts
3,163 battles
On 10/9/2018 at 7:52 PM, mr_glitchy_R said:

Why BB lines right now have some gimmicks in it?

because Gimmick department has grudge against Actually good battleships, any battleship that has gimmick, obviously it was a total trash. but you need to release it in market. thus the Battleship also started getting gimmick. Main gun reload booster EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW.

I really love Iowa. Classic fun.

Edited by Labeat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
156
Member
408 posts
4,801 battles

@Labeat: So far the only battleships armed with Main Battery RB are Jean Bart and Bourgogne. No word on the others yet.

As for battleships armed with gimmicks, I have nothing to say that made any sense so I will stay quiet.

@IJN BB line rework: @DeadArashi has a thread in the suggestions sub-forum that details his proposal for the IJN BB line rework that split the true battleships from battlecruisers. Its worth looking at.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34
[FFD]
Member
173 posts
3,163 battles
16 minutes ago, TD1 said:

So far the only battleships armed with Main Battery RB are Jean Bart and Bourgogne.

but you know that this gimmick idea is already took action, that means there are chance more bbs will get it with balance reasons. 

AND DO YOU KNOW, RUSSIAN BB LINE ARE STILL TO COME.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
131
[FISH]
Member
343 posts
27,725 battles
19 hours ago, icy_phoenix said:

More like, IJN DD general playerbase needs a rework.

Consider this: If a ship or line is horribly not fun to play, the more intelligent portion of the player base will figure out that its not worth their time and move to other lines.

Who does that leave playing this ship or line ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
237
[SMOKE]
Member
697 posts
10,608 battles
19 hours ago, icy_phoenix said:

More like, IJN DD general playerbase needs a rework.

I think its the whole DD and counter DD mechanism need work instead. Radar is a issue , BB's AP shoot another, and then there's the question how the DD are grossly mismatched in a game ( I've in games where there is 4 IJN on one side and Soviet + US on the other ). WG had been leaning way too much with BB player that the game mechanics had skewed a lot towards that and this destroy many balanced play with other type of ships, the CL and DD suffered the most in short the mechanism basically now made them pretty much either do their job and die quick or not to go do their job instead.

Radar should be made not to penetrate landmass and the Radar emitting ship should be revealing itself to the enemy whenever Radar is active

The whole torp mechanism should be reworked ; as in real life ; there should be a choice to mount the torp in different configuration just like switching between HE and AP on the fly ( lower speed with longer range, higher speed and short range )

 

Personally I do not find the IJN BB line extra boring , its no more boring than say RN or US.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
65
[KCSEA]
Member
127 posts
6,049 battles
12 hours ago, Pervis117 said:

Consider this: If a ship or line is horribly not fun to play, the more intelligent portion of the player base will figure out that its not worth their time and move to other lines.

Who does that leave playing this ship or line ?

"Well, IJN DDs attract those pedophile weaboos" or "IJN DDs has been one of the oldest lines in the game therefore it has bloated popularity" or "IJN DDs attract all noob players". 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×