Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
Somedude_Yudachi

Am I the only one who thinks Moskva should have a reduction of concealment?

11 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

137
[ANZAC]
Member
432 posts
14,001 battles
10 minutes ago, Somedude_Yudachi said:

It even worse than a bb,make it 12km at least if 11km isn't acceptable

It's nick name is "Battleship Moskva" for a reason...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
221
[SGC]
Member
455 posts
9,008 battles
38 minutes ago, Somedude_Yudachi said:

It even worse than a bb,make it 12km at least if 11km isn't acceptable

So?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
137
[ANZAC]
Member
432 posts
14,001 battles

Actually, I think US DD torps need better concealment while we are at it, 100m should be about right

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
592
[CLAY]
Member
1,075 posts
7,858 battles

Let’s see... Moskva. Very accurate guns which hit really hard and can citadel a cruiser from max range. Also 11.7km radar.

Yes, this is a ship which we should allow to get closer to us before being spotted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
594
[TLS]
Member
1,152 posts
16,543 battles

We seem to have a proliferation of people who cannot seem to adapt to a particular ship.

If you cannot adapt to a ship playstyle, then don't play it. Otherwise might as well make every ship like a zao.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
381
[PATEN]
Video Contributor, Clantest Coordinator
2,417 posts
11,498 battles

Not enough bias? :Smile_popcorn:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×