661 [FOF] Big_Black_Hawk Member 1,701 posts 25,539 battles Report post #1 Posted July 4, 2018 1.Poor concealment 2.Poor maneuverablity 3.Poor DPS 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
464 Unraveler Beta Tester 1,321 posts 21,896 battles Report post #2 Posted July 4, 2018 You know what will happen... Patch Notes 0.7.8 Buffalo - Increased DPS of Catapult Fighter 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
763 [GS] Onlinegamer Video Contributor, Beta Tester 2,952 posts 15,181 battles Report post #3 Posted July 5, 2018 You dont need radar use spotter Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
582 [REPOI] LordTyphoon Member 1,121 posts 27,927 battles Report post #4 Posted July 5, 2018 8 hours ago, Unraveler said: You know what will happen... Patch Notes 0.7.8 Buffalo - Increased DPS of Catapult Fighter Also buff primary armament reload from 13 seconds to 12.9 seconds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
65 [RQB] Exiaa Member 114 posts 8,645 battles Report post #5 Posted July 5, 2018 1 hour ago, LordTyphoon said: Also buff primary armament reload from 13 seconds to 12.9 seconds. And then turning circle buff of 1m Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
582 [REPOI] LordTyphoon Member 1,121 posts 27,927 battles Report post #6 Posted July 5, 2018 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Exiaa said: And then turning circle buff of 1m Then add 1 extra chef to the crew member Edited July 5, 2018 by LordTyphoon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4,066 [TLS] dejiko_nyo Member 5,849 posts 24,614 battles Report post #7 Posted July 5, 2018 Remove radar, give zao level concealment. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
464 Unraveler Beta Tester 1,321 posts 21,896 battles Report post #8 Posted July 5, 2018 Pretty sure the concealment will never be buffed. The early versions of Buffalo had 10.1km concealment which gave it a similar stealth-radar as (new) Baltimore and Des Moines (ie. about 700m between detection and radar range). However, this was changed to 10.5km during the testing period. The reason for the change wasn't mentioned in the dev blog but once something has been specifically altered like that, it is rarely ever reversed. If it does get a buff, my money is on Rudder Shift. That's kinda the direction they're pushing Des Moines, too, with the legendary upgrade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
41 [MALD] devil667 Member 166 posts 35,682 battles Report post #9 Posted July 6, 2018 Wait till you get Seattle. :) Buffalo is a pretty good ship imho. Infact its rather fun to go peekaboo in. At best would have enjoyed 1kn higher speed, but then again I do not think WG will make any USN CA that exceeds 33kn, so its all good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
56 [REPOI] _AkaNo Member 220 posts 16,360 battles Report post #10 Posted July 6, 2018 Why play Buffalo when all you need to do is free exp it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
206 [MALD] Pervis117 Member 443 posts 40,701 battles Report post #11 Posted July 6, 2018 Buffalo is a really strong ship, it doesn't need a buff. Your problem, I suspect, is that your idea of how to play and position high tier USN CA's have been shaped by the three triple turret layout of the New Orleans, Baltimore and Des Moines and you're struggling to bring all 4 to bear effectively without exposing too much and getting rekt. Play it more like you would have a T6 cleveland, your results will be better. Don't extend range, go for DPS. And get the words "Expert Loader is a necessary skill for Buffalo" tattooed on the back of your hand. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4,066 [TLS] dejiko_nyo Member 5,849 posts 24,614 battles Report post #12 Posted July 7, 2018 One word: Adapt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
61 Dendi_Superman Member 119 posts 3,770 battles Report post #13 Posted July 9, 2018 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
