Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
Somedude_Yudachi

Am I the only thinks WG should add 8km torps option to Hindenburg as well?

24 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Member
980 posts
12,617 battles

Nah, Hindenburg is good enough. 8km torps will be out of control. The moment the Hindenburg sails somewhere everybody must RUN 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
97
[LYNMF]
Member
991 posts
11,618 battles

i think this sheep need 20K more health and 12km torp

11sec reload is too long, this nerf make hinden unplayable! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
114 posts
3,889 battles
6 minutes ago, Puggsley said:

No more Kevin Spacey memes please, its quite creepy........

 

D8SVWl6.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
78
[ANZAC]
Member
340 posts
11,506 battles

And while are at it, the Belfast needs torps .And a heal. And def AA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
534 posts
5 hours ago, Lipovitan_Z44 said:

good idea - better to improve Moskva reload time to 6s as well.:cap_hmm:

I think 5 seconds or adding the second rear turret would be better

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
534 posts
2 hours ago, j0e90 said:

And while are at it, the Belfast needs torps .And a heal. And def AA

That's exactly what I was thinking before it was withdrawn from the store

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
139
[BOTES]
Member
439 posts
3,957 battles

I thought of the same before Hindenburg was arguably UP. 

Now tho giving her 8km  torps would make her too good

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×