18 Admiral_224 Member 118 posts 1,833 battles Report post #1 Posted January 31 (edited) Title says it all. I feel that the Yamato looks rather... lackluster compared to the other tier 10 BBs. Right now, she is just basically a XP/Credits piñata for any HE spammer. So, does Yammy need a buff right now? Edited February 1 by Admiral_224 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
29 [BLUMR] DonnerSushi Member 183 posts 3,790 battles Report post #2 Posted January 31 It's that time of the month again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
302 [LNA] legionary2099 [LNA] Member 1,655 posts 10,411 battles Report post #3 Posted January 31 Like really, does it need it. Im doubtful as it is the premier sniper in game with a bulky healthpool to shrug off hits. ASIA meta isnt kind to it, but it doesnt mean it need a buff. It fulfill its niche very well, although wether the team need that niche or not is another story. A one trick pony i guess. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
75 [DS] MikuChrome Member 203 posts 11,788 battles Report post #4 Posted January 31 Oh wow one of the minority thinking that Yamato is lackluster. Yeah she might be boring to play at times thanks to how she handles. (Both guns and Current Meta combined) Having the ability to lolpen 32mm of armor kind of making her worth a while compare to other BB like Montana, G. Kurfurst considering some Cruisers has 30mm of armor which can bounce 16" guns. Yamato is powerful for that one department .... just one everything else is ...yeah lackluster. If you find Yamato is not your thing then you might wanna try Battleships of other nations saving time and trouble trying to debate about which one is the best or even trying to get her buff.If both GK and Montana could handle those cruisers with 30mm of armor, Yamato will truly be lackluster but meh I'm not the one making the decision. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,175 [LBAS] MatterCore [LBAS] Member 4,455 posts 25,589 battles Report post #5 Posted January 31 (edited) didnt see this topic 2 hours ago, MatterCore said: Edited January 31 by MatterCore Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
47 [LLBC] Hey_Potato Member 273 posts 1,220 battles Report post #6 Posted January 31 (edited) That's my battleship!! Back to the topic...how I wish to upgrade the guns 460mm to 660mm so can citadel every ship irregardless of angle. Edited January 31 by Hey_Potato Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
106 Pervis117 Member 270 posts 23,546 battles Report post #7 Posted January 31 Yamato doesn't need a buff, every other t10 BB needs a nerf by having raised citadels which can be hit properly Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
21 [EX0] Lowyat Member 216 posts 11,476 battles Report post #8 Posted February 1 slightly better aa Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
162 [LLBC] FenrirApalis Member 1,859 posts 5,797 battles Report post #9 Posted February 1 (edited) dude we can't even vote no properly if you think Yamato needs a buff u need to l2p Actually just git gudder, having a Yamato means you are no newbie Edited February 1 by FenrirApalis Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
623 [LEAK] Harpoon01 Alpha Tester 6,604 posts 2,477 battles Report post #10 Posted February 1 this topic seems familiar hmmm was it about "Maus Need a Buff?" 1 Onlinegamer reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
302 [LNA] legionary2099 [LNA] Member 1,655 posts 10,411 battles Report post #11 Posted February 1 12 minutes ago, Harpoon01 said: this topic seems familiar hmmm was it about "Maus Need a Buff?" Not many people will get it if they dont play WoT. Instead ask does Midway right now need a buff ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
278 [PATEN] Onlinegamer Video Contributor 2,259 posts 10,776 battles Report post #12 Posted February 1 Maus needs armor what Yamato needs? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
6 [LLBC] _GitGud Member 56 posts 8,301 battles Report post #13 Posted February 1 slightly buff her turret is ok another is be GitGud :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
17 [LGND] Gesterbein Member 207 posts 8,167 battles Report post #14 Posted February 1 how about buff yamato player.... really, in this server so many Yamato player who still thinking yamato is best BB for solo and charging alone to enemy like their Yamato is so invicible.... every T10 BB is XP pinata for HE Spammer especially GK thr most easy ship to set a fire lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
166 [DBN1] Pocket_Fox Beta Tester 823 posts 4,954 battles Report post #15 Posted February 1 No, it doesn't need a buff. If anything, nerfs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
987 [MEGA] drakon233 [MEGA] Member 4,560 posts 17,542 battles Report post #16 Posted February 1 32 minutes ago, Gesterbein said: how about buff yamato player.... really, in this server so many Yamato player who still thinking yamato is best BB for solo and charging alone to enemy like their Yamato is so invicible.... every T10 BB is XP pinata for HE Spammer especially GK thr most easy ship to set a fire lol erm, no. GK is the most resistant ship to HE spam becasue 203 shells shatter a lot on her deck and sides, the weakest ship to HE spam is hands down conq, 4-6k salvos from anything with 203+ guns Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,559 [SGC] icy_phoenix Super Tester 7,512 posts 7,978 battles Report post #17 Posted February 1 Does a ship require a buff? It depends on whether the said ship is able to perform her role well enough in average hands. Does Yamato need a buff? Personally I do not think so. She is an amazing gun platform and her job is to spread terror of overmatch hype. She does her job damn well. Let's go through the options: Citadel position, that's like her one of the two weaknesses. She is not a brawler, hence if you are getting cit hit in yamato, it means you are playing her wrong, and hence no buffs required to the "ship". Also the same reason why her turret traverse is also fine. You do not shoot left and right with Yamato, you grab a position, and hold it like a fortress. I also believe secondaries on yamato aren't really worth talking about and fine as is. Increasing secondaries will barely make any impact for average playerbase anyway. Her other weakness is AA, but I think that is not a problem either. Not all ships should have monster AA. Yamato is still the deadliest damage dealer battleship in tier 10. IMO, for current TX BBs: Yamato -> Meant to be tank concealment build. Montana -> AA and concealment build. GK -> secondary and tank build. Mongqueror -> sell it, just another tank concealment candidate. 6 minutes ago, drakon233 said: erm, no. GK is the most resistant ship to HE spam becasue 203 shells shatter a lot on her deck and sides, GK is most easy to set fire is what he said, and that is true. GK has the biggest size, and hard to miss. And I'm pretty sure shattered HE can set on fire too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
244 [BRU] Mingfang47 Super Tester 2,725 posts Report post #18 Posted February 1 Edit the poll, if a user chooses 'No' then put 'None' in the buff choices. Users are still required to answer the 2nd question. On-topic: 15 hours ago, Admiral_224 said: Right now, she is just basically a XP/Credits piñata for any HE spammer. Why do you think the buff should only apply to Yamato when that is also an issue for other big (and wide) battleships? (FdG & GK said, Guten Tag) Yeah, I recognize that issue on the Yamato (which I have been playing in random & clan battles, FdG as well) but the positive side is that those "HE spammer" won't deal much damage after reducing certain part of the ship to zero, which is an actually good game mechanic. Though I played Yamato differently: (1) read the map (for where the enemy going) then plan out, (2) Bow forward or angled, (3) don't go near frontline (just 2nd line) & get critical damage to the enemy because of 2.1 sigma & aiming system upgrade for accuracy. For fire prevention, I have DamCon (reduce risk) & 2 (reduce time), and fire prevention (reduce fire chance) & reduce fire & flooding time perks. One question though... did you convey that issue from a friend or something? Because you don't have a Yamato and I wonder why you raise such suggestion to buff it, although Iowa counted in the concern but why Yamato? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,323 [SIF] RalphTheTheatreCat [SIF] Super Tester 3,824 posts 4,100 battles Report post #19 Posted February 1 Poll is flawed. 2nd question doesnt have "nothing is needed" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
78 [ANZAC] j0e90 Member 340 posts 11,469 battles Report post #20 Posted February 1 3 hours ago, RalphTheTheatreCat said: Poll is flawed. 2nd question doesnt have "nothing is needed" And where is the 'More Bacon Option'? Because (a) Every poll needs bacon, and (b) adding bacon as an option would make this poll 456% more relevant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
278 [PATEN] Onlinegamer Video Contributor 2,259 posts 10,776 battles Report post #21 Posted February 1 4 hours ago, icy_phoenix said: Yamato -> Meant to be tank concealment build. Montana -> AA and concealment build. GK -> secondary and tank build. Mongqueror -> sell it, just another tank concealment candidate. All concealment build need more improve stealth *cough* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
302 [LNA] legionary2099 [LNA] Member 1,655 posts 10,411 battles Report post #22 Posted February 1 15 minutes ago, Onlinegamer said: All concealment build need more improve stealth *cough* Maybe Japan can jump time and bring this back as the new Yamato , you know ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
47 [LLBC] Hey_Potato Member 273 posts 1,220 battles Report post #23 Posted February 1 17 minutes ago, legionary2099 said: Maybe Japan can jump time and bring this back as the new Yamato , you know ... This ship is deployed by the drug cartel to transport drugs from south america Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
244 [BRU] Mingfang47 Super Tester 2,725 posts Report post #24 Posted February 1 OP/TS replied to me via PM: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
168 [KGHSF] THAI_THIEF [KGHSF] Member 3,203 posts 6,023 battles Report post #25 Posted February 1 I WANT ANTI-AIRPLANES BUFF DAMN IT! GIVE ME ANOTHER VOTE WHERE IS THE ANTI AIR? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
