Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
Serazahar

Give Z52 option to change Hydro for DFAA

16 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

13
[REPOI]
Member
67 posts
5,252 battles

So I was wondering if Z 52 should be given the option to change Hydro for DFAA since I think the trade off is pretty balanced and also the fact that the game stated that she has "very powerful AA defense".

z52AA.PNG.d11e6196a4d37f3d050093fa9c605d2b.PNG

 

At least even Akizuki AA build can hold it's own against its respective tier carriers.

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
465
[LNA]
Member
1,929 posts
11,870 battles
1 hour ago, Seraza said:

So I was wondering if Z 52 should be given the option to change Hydro for DFAA since I think the trade off is pretty balanced and also the fact that the game stated that she has "very powerful AA defense".

z52AA.PNG.d11e6196a4d37f3d050093fa9c605d2b.PNG

 

At least even Akizuki AA build can hold it's own against its respective tier carriers.

 

Why dont you say : Dogeza , Please remove CV from the game WG sensei !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
864
[MRI]
Member
1,974 posts
11,106 battles

Probably not going to happen.

Players have been asking for the Akizuki - you know the ship that was historically designed and built for AA escort duty - to get DFAA, but WG just goes nope, because reasons. :Smile_facepalm:

So I doubt Z-52 will get DFAA. Maybe if enough WG devs get dev-striked by CVs in their Z-52, then they might consider... :Smile_hiding:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
362
Member
1,346 posts
6,037 battles

IJNDD really need ultra strong AA and DFAA to widen plane drop.

my shima just get wrack by tier 10 CV last match and there's no counter play at all, so unfair T_T

 

no wait.... just remove CV and all problem solve! Eureka!!

WoWs would be better place without them to break all balance!

:cap_win:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
114
[POI]
Member
520 posts
11,152 battles

If they could increase AA capabilities of the Z52.. that would be really nice... Its always a priority target for aircraft:(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
528
[AUSNZ]
Beta Tester
842 posts
8,249 battles
15 hours ago, Thyaliad said:

Players have been asking for the Akizuki - you know the ship that was historically designed and built for AA escort duty - to get DFAA, but WG just goes nope, because reasons. :Smile_facepalm:

The reasons being that she has half again as much base AA power as the Kidd, and we know how incredibly strong the Kidd is with def AA up.  It would be pretty unbalanced.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
864
[MRI]
Member
1,974 posts
11,106 battles
6 hours ago, Moggytwo said:

The reasons being that she has half again as much base AA power as the Kidd, and we know how incredibly strong the Kidd is with def AA up.  It would be pretty unbalanced.

Just give Akizuki a weaker DFAA with no damage multiplier, only the panic spread. Don't forget that DFAA for US and Russian DDs were buffed recently (from x3 to x4 damage I believe) while Akizuki got nothing, so a Kidd with DFAA has more than twice the AA power Akizuki has. Currently, Akizuki's are not really a threat to me when I play CVs. They can't protect their allies, they can't even protect themselves since they are too slow and too cumbersome to dodge torpedo bombers from a determined CV player.

Anyway, my point is that if WG does not want to give Akizuki, which imo should receive DFAA for both balance and historical reasons, DFAA, then what chance would the Z-52 get have? Just because its description says it has powerful AA systems, doesn't mean it is going to get DFAA, at least not in WG's eyes.

Edited by Thyaliad
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
263
[LUOMU]
Super Tester
1,420 posts
10,747 battles

AA data of full AA build T10 DDs (with ManAA)

Shimakaze 69.2@4.5km+99@7.2km

(suppose it has 4x DAAF 276.8@4.5km+396@7.2km)

Gearing 71@2.9km+87.5@5km+148.5@7.2km

(71@2.9km+350@5km+594@7.2km)

Z-52 118.8@5km+229.4@7.2km

(suppose it has 4x DAAF 475.2@5km+917.6@7.2km)

Khabarovsk 23.1@1.7km+108.9@5km+161.7@7.5km

Grozovoi 26.4@4.5km+135.3@5km+165@7.5km

(105.6@4.5km+541.2@5km+660@7.5km)

Yueyang 57.8@2.9km+87.5@5km+148.5@7.2km

Akizuki 97.6@4.5km+219.1@7.2km

(suppose 4x 390.4@4.5km+876.4@7.2km)

Kidd 47.5@2.9km+84.5@5km+139.9@7.2km

(47.5@2.9km+338@5km+559.6@7.2km)

Fletcher 41.2@2.9km+92.4@5km+174.9@7.2km

(41.2@2.9km+369.6@5km+699.6@7.2km)

Guess Z-52 simply has too much base DPS for the devs to consider adding a DAAF consumable

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
263
[LUOMU]
Super Tester
1,420 posts
10,747 battles
17 minutes ago, Adm_Kunkka said:

Wait wut? Fletcher has higher aadps than gearing? :cap_cool:

That’s why people build AA Fletcher rather than Gearing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×