Jump to content
unknownaussie

US CV Changes Suck

27 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Beta Tester
153 posts
3,490 battles

What even is the point of playing US Cv's I hate what they have done to them and it feels theres no further point in playing them the whole feel of the line point of playing them is gone

 

Locked on OP's request.

~amade

Edited by amade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MEGA]
Member
4,564 posts
17,569 battles
2 hours ago, unknownaussie said:

having only one fighter squadron sucks and is a stupid change 

blah blah blah rant

 

if you are going to whine here can you at least have the decency to not make it pointless? you dont evem explain why you think it's stupid 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Super Tester
730 posts
3,239 battles

I like it, no more AS Bogue / [content removed]

Derogatory. Post edited, user sanctioned.

~amade

Edited by amade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,496 posts
2 hours ago, drakon233 said:

blah blah blah rant

 

if you are going to whine here can you at least have the decency to not make it pointless? you dont evem explain why you think it's stupid 

 

I think the point is that Japanese carriers mostly have 2 OR MORE fighter squadrons, & usually you will see those carrier drivers will AWAYS run more fighters out, just to wipe out your planes, & now the US carriers are mostly 1 1 1 configured (higher tiers are slightly different), then it makes it potentially easier to lose your 1 squadron of fighters, while the Japanese carriers can still do air superiority.... & also strike at the same time.

 

Saying that Japanese planes are weaker & not as many in a squadron is not going to do much good, because they always fly them in packs of 2 or more..... 1 US squadron vs 2 (or 3) Japanese squadrons.... Easy math....

 

This also is not taking into account ranger meeting Saipan.

 

That is the point he is trying to make.

 

Ordrazz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
660 posts
3,526 battles
24 minutes ago, Thyaliad said:

I guess OP likes to play AS. 

OP love AS for a reason, " CLEAR SKY " .

 

So he's clearly a AS worshipper.

Edited by LawrenceXVIII

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
347 posts

I think WG has realised by now that USN CV loadouts aren't great

4 Threads in 10 days on the same topic

And this thread

I'm pretty sure this is just an interim buff to make USN CVs more viable while WG takes abit more time to come up with a better solution (the rework that includes AA reworks and UI fixes so on so forth correct me if I'm wrong)

 

Edited by BravaZulu296

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
153 posts
3,490 battles
On 11/30/2017 at 5:11 PM, drakon233 said:

blah blah blah rant

 

if you are going to whine here can you at least have the decency to not make it pointless? you dont evem explain why you think it's stupid 

maybe you should try playing the game instead of being a forum troll you have a sad life maybe try doing something as radical as trying to help people for once but i doubt it 

Edited by unknownaussie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Super Tester
802 posts
2 hours ago, unknownaussie said:

maybe you should try playing the game instead of being a forum troll you have a sad life maybe try doing something as radical as trying to help people for once but i doubt it 

 

Maybe you should offer some suggestions and or construction conversation to improve USN CVs then?

 

Otherwise you're going to get the same response from most of us; you're ranting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MEGA]
Member
4,564 posts
17,569 battles
6 hours ago, Counterflak said:

 

Maybe you should offer some suggestions and or construction conversation to improve USN CVs then?

 

Otherwise you're going to get the same response from most of us; you're ranting.

why do you bother? people will whine on on the forums about percived "wrongs" in the game and when challaged with "why is that a problem" they will hide behind insults and personal attack, because they dont know what they are  talking about and cant stand up for their arugement

 

like how he just PMed to insult me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
70 posts
3,102 battles

If you play USN Carrier now, You will know why he rant.
I just played today, and try my old Lexington, i thought on this new update, its gonna be better but its not. its worst! 
I prefer 202 over 112, 
In 202, you can defend your plane against enemy carrier (IJN) with 2 fighter
unlike 112, you cant, why? 1 fighter against 2? How? Bait? Fool a player? Nope, you cant Bait or Fool a CV player now. 
1 v 1 enemy fighter
the other 1 enemy fighter? where? eating the 12 load out of USN Carrier.
So what the use of AP bombs if the enemy fighter can straf them or eat them? 
USN Carrier is balanced if enemy CV is lack of experience. 
I'm sorry, but I can't take it anymore. I hope you can understand! 
Happy Gaming! 

Edited by Commander_GALEN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,354 posts
8,881 battles
3 hours ago, Commander_GALEN said:

If you play USN Carrier now, You will know why he rant.
I just played today, and try my old Lexington, i thought on this new update, its gonna be better but its not. its worst! 
I prefer 202 over 112, 
In 202, you can defend your plane against enemy carrier (IJN) with 2 fighter
unlike 112, you cant, why? 1 fighter against 2? How? Bait? Fool a player? Nope, you cant Bait or Fool a CV player now. 

It seems that the only people who don't like this change are those that genuinely like to use the AS loadout.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
154 posts
345 battles

now we got a conclusion :

Option 1 :

1. Bogue 201 is beep beep and SHALL BE REMOVED, 111 bogue is balanced.... also THEY NERF ZUIHO! -_-

2. start from Independence, USN CV should get AS 201 loadout too! but 111 option is for strike! Ryujo got 312 to counter this already....

3. LEX and Ranger should get 202 loadout as strike!

4. Essex? 302 standart lelel AS

5. 303 for Midway AS hehehehe... 3 AP dive bomber??? FREEEEEDDOOM IS BACCK!

 

or....

Option 2 :

REMOVE IJN AS from the game!! and buff both USN and IJN DB HP by 25%. increase USN rear gunner damage by 100%. now rear gunner USN can shotdown fighter that chasing it!

 

 

another scattered useless advice lel

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LNA]
Member
1,666 posts
10,491 battles
On 30/11/2017 at 11:33 AM, unknownaussie said:

having only one fighter squadron sucks and is a stupid change 

Like you even need dat one FT when AA is so scary pass 9. Come on , bring 2 Nep Nep and the game is over for your enemy.

I will gladly take 114 just to see the face of BB when the REAPERS is coming for him :Smile_teethhappy:.

Then again , having one FT allow you to focus on WASD hacking with it comparing to having to command 2. I have juked quite a few strafes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
153 posts
3,490 battles
On 12/2/2017 at 2:38 AM, Commander_GALEN said:

If you play USN Carrier now, You will know why he rant.
I just played today, and try my old Lexington, i thought on this new update, its gonna be better but its not. its worst! 
I prefer 202 over 112, 
In 202, you can defend your plane against enemy carrier (IJN) with 2 fighter
unlike 112, you cant, why? 1 fighter against 2? How? Bait? Fool a player? Nope, you cant Bait or Fool a CV player now. 
1 v 1 enemy fighter
the other 1 enemy fighter? where? eating the 12 load out of USN Carrier.
So what the use of AP bombs if the enemy fighter can straf them or eat them? 
USN Carrier is balanced if enemy CV is lack of experience. 
I'm sorry, but I can't take it anymore. I hope you can understand! 
Happy Gaming! 

 See drakon someone helpful i was wrong to put what i said to you in Pm the way i put it but try being helpful and constructive on the forums and add to it not rant or your wrong because i think so real people say why the dont agree with someones opinion or  provide facts the debate as my new post will say .the lexington yes i played 202 and i hate it being ruined if they gave it 202 with ap bombs as a choice that would be so much better

Edited by unknownaussie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,354 posts
8,881 battles

To be honest at high tiers it is not the enemy's fighters that I fear, it is those ships with ridiculously high AA like Des Moines and Minotaurs which rip apart my planes if they so much as brush against their AA bubble. In my Essex, I would rather fight against an AS IJN CV all day then a USN CV supported by high AA cruisers.

Talking about Essex, I feel she needs her T9 torpedo bombers back. Took her out for a spin a few times today and those T8 bombers really hurt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[MEGA]
Member
4,564 posts
17,569 battles
44 minutes ago, unknownaussie said:

 See drakon someone helpful i was wrong to put what i said to you in Pm the way i put it but try being helpful and constructive on the forums and add to it not rant or your wrong because i think so real people say why the dont agree with someones opinion or  provide facts the debate as my new post will say .the lexington yes i played 202 and i hate it being ruined if they gave it 202 with ap bombs as a choice that would be so much better

and then sending another PM trying  to taunt me after "apologizing"? yeah, nice try.

your OP was not constructive, it was not helpful and it was most certainly a pointless rant, the only thing that gave this thread any substance was the replys that were posted by the forumers after my post

 

and as for the "grow a spine" comment from your PM; why bother losting my forum brownie points when i can just get you banned?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
153 posts
3,490 battles

Airing your Pms on a public thread is just silly as for my thread go read my new one mate and honestly your threats are just meaningless grow up 

Edited by unknownaussie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LNA]
Member
1,666 posts
10,491 battles
Just now, unknownaussie said:

Airing your pms on the forums is childish but i dont care maybe you should read my new threat then 

I feel like my Int stat just dropped a lot when i read your comments. When 10 people tell you the damn same thing , better think again and think why people tell you so

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×