Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
Schwarzhelmm

RN carriers line possible?

16 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[LNA]
Member
1,666 posts
10,494 battles
25 minutes ago, Schwarzhelmm said:

Have been thinking of it since they got lots of carriers build in ww2

No , they can not do it if they dont want angry mobs throw eggs and butter at them.

They failed to deliver CV gameplay fixes on time and that is one big bomb dropped already on the community.

I dont blame devs for being overcrowded with works , but atleast they should promise wisely where they can.

Until they fix this , no more CV line

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
213 posts
4,131 battles

No, atleast not right time for another CV line for under reason

>Dev has no ideal what to do with CV, so they need time to fully overhaul CV gameplay, AA and spotting mechanic also need overhaul same time with CV

>Brit have a lot of CV, but most of them is CVL, CVE the biggest ship is Malta class (carry 80 planes), with currently high tier CV gameplay, they will out of planes by AA gun before can do anything.

>Again if they  put RN CV in game now, dev still need dig somewhere and find 2 ship for tier 9-10

>And seriously, for some reason anything relevant with Brit will take a lot of time to deal with, just look how much time they need to release UK tanks in WoT and RN CL line in WoWS. even G*ijin is no difference.

Edited by K135Blitzkrieg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
660 posts
3,532 battles

For now , its not the right time to discuss so, CV is still BORKEN. They need to REWORK them.

 

HOWEVER IL SHOW SOME EXAMPLES OF ROYAL CV IF MOST OF YOU ARE INTERESTED TO LOOKED AT.

From Old to New

Argus ( 1918 )

HMS_Argus_(1917).jpg

 

Furious (1917) Also Known as Courageous Class. But formally it was BB back there.

HMS_Furious-15.jpg

 

Eagle ( 1918-1924) ( Thicc Bridgehead Superstructure )

HMS_Eagle_(1918).jpg

 

Hermes ( 1924 )  (this pic below is 1938 )

HMS_Hermes_1938.jpg

 

Ark Royal ( 1938 )

HMS_Ark_Royal_h85716.jpg

 

Unicorn (1943) ( For Bronies Among who thinks Unicorn is for ponies too ) (This Pic below is 1951 )

Unicorn-g427411.jpg

 

Illustrious ( 1940)

HMS_Illustrious_(AWM_302415).jpg

 

Implacable ( 1944 )

HMS_Implacable_(R86).jpg

 

Colossus (1944) (This CV is 1950 HMS Triumph )

HMS_Triumph_1950.jpg

 

Majestic ( 1942 ) ( This one below is Hercules. It just laid down but not Commissioned. Only Majestic is 1955 )

HMS_Hercules_aircraft_carrier.jpg

 

This is what i can show you for 1918 - 1945 ( follows the timeline in wows )

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by LawrenceXVIII
CVS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
148 posts
555 battles
2 hours ago, LawrenceXVIII said:

For now , its not the right time to discuss so, CV is still BORKEN. They need to REWORK them.

 

HOWEVER IL SHOW SOME EXAMPLES OF ROYAL CV IF MOST OF YOU ARE INTERESTED TO LOOKED AT.

From Old to New

Argus ( 1918 )

HMS_Argus_(1917).jpg

 

Furious (1917) Also Known as Courageous Class. But formally it was BB back there.

HMS_Furious-15.jpg

 

Eagle ( 1918-1924) ( Thicc Bridgehead Superstructure )

HMS_Eagle_(1918).jpg

 

Hermes ( 1924 )  (this pic below is 1938 )

HMS_Hermes_1938.jpg

 

Ark Royal ( 1938 )

HMS_Ark_Royal_h85716.jpg

 

Unicorn (1943) ( For Bronies Among who thinks Unicorn is for ponies too ) (This Pic below is 1951 )

Unicorn-g427411.jpg

 

Illustrious ( 1940)

HMS_Illustrious_(AWM_302415).jpg

 

Implacable ( 1944 )

HMS_Implacable_(R86).jpg

 

Colossus (1944) (This CV is 1950 HMS Triumph )

HMS_Triumph_1950.jpg

 

Majestic ( 1942 ) ( This one below is Hercules. It just laid down but not Commissioned. Only Majestic is 1955 )

HMS_Hercules_aircraft_carrier.jpg

 

This is what i can show you for 1918 - 1945 ( follows the timeline in wows )

 

 

 

 

 

WW2 CVs look quite advanced, don't know if they will put it in the game as it may prove to be quite OP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,107 posts
7,849 battles

to put mildly, RN Naval aviation were underdeveloped compared to IJN or USN. 

 

I would like to see how they put Armored carrier concept into WoW.

the concept itself were kinda failed IRL.

but its might end up being interesting like the rest of RN line (where cruiser spam AP and BB spam HE - so mindblowing)

Edited by humusz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LBAS]
Member
4,499 posts
25,682 battles

 

 

18 minutes ago, humusz said:

to put mildly, RN Naval aviation were underdeveloped compared to IJN or USN. 

 

Pacific Theater too hot huh

N3031C.82110527_std.jpg

Spoiler

latest?cb=20150710092300

 

Edited by MatterCore

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,107 posts
7,849 battles
17 minutes ago, MatterCore said:

Pacific Theater too hot huh

Nah more like mindset.

they have strong and old naval tradition.

being solid and old, they lumbering and hard to accept new ideas. unlike emerging new Naval nation that more than willing to adopt and explore new things

 

I remember that some british Naval aviator shot down and saved by American carrier

the experience they have there can be summed up as "I hope our Carrier can be as good as American"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×