Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
Shankeyyy

HMS QE, is it worth it?

17 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,801
[SLAVA]
Super Tester_
7,897 posts
8,986 battles

If you see head in this coin in the picture it is worthy, not worthy if you see tail.

 

MdMllDK.gif

Edited by icy_phoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27
[STUN]
[STUN]
Member
82 posts
3,628 battles
1 hour ago, Lord_Harrab said:

She's not a bad ship, its just Warspite is so much better

This. Warspite starts out with better secondary range if that floats your boat.
It's able to twist about enough to avoid most torps.
Sure, AA is poorer than the QE, but it's not(the QE's AA) enough to stop a CV player who's bent on sinking you.

9 minutes ago, Shankeyyy said:

WHAT ABOUT LEANDER?

uh, why did you jump topic suddenly?

 

1 hour ago, drakon233 said:

no

uh, could you elaborate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40
[LBAS]
Member
358 posts
6,262 battles

Its a master of none. Better than iron duke but hard to use against all the rest of the t6 bb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31
[BLUMR]
Member
190 posts
4,335 battles

It's fine, I can do ok(70k damage) on T8 games with it. The guns are accurate, though don't expect citadels against BBs. The turret traverse is a non-issue if you know how to plan your route. It's good if you know how to aim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
827
[LBAS]
Super Tester_
1,770 posts
37 minutes ago, Shankeyyy said:

WHAT ABOUT LEANDER?

Leander is not a BB......

You were asking about BB's remember......

Edited by LtDan_IceCream

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
83 posts
3,586 battles

well, he didn't specify BB's. Only the QE was mentioned.

As for the Leander, I dont recall much about it. So couldnt say specifically, but I have enjoyed every british CL that I've used, so there is something good about it somewhere

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,102
[REPOI]
Member
5,704 posts
23,949 battles
42 minutes ago, mitts said:

This. Warspite starts out with better secondary range if that floats your boat.
It's able to twist about enough to avoid most torps.
Sure, AA is poorer than the QE, but it's not(the QE's AA) enough to stop a CV player who's bent on sinking you.

uh, why did you jump topic suddenly?

 

uh, could you elaborate?

think bayern guns, with worse penn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
83
[JABBA]
Beta Tester
449 posts
4,149 battles
10 minutes ago, drakon233 said:

think bayern guns, with worse penn

But better fire chance, so..?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31
[BLUMR]
Member
190 posts
4,335 battles
3 minutes ago, admiral_tee said:

But better fire chance, so..?

With 8 barrels? Nah, I don't think the HE is worth it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
110
[-BRO-]
Member
541 posts
3 hours ago, Shankeyyy said:

:cap_wander_2:

If you're confident in dodging shells,you can consider to try RN cruiser line,Conqueror is a splendid battleship though it's quite weak armored compare to german battleships

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
6,605 posts
2,889 battles

how should i say

 

underwhelming ship grind before glorious ship at the next tier (which is literally Floating Churchill Crocodile)

QE lacks many things that makes Warspite comfortable, AA does not include since both AA are trash anyway

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11
[TOGN]
[TOGN]
Beta Tester
130 posts
18,767 battles

yes i she is a great ship and i thoroughly  loved  playing her since i have warspite is the reason i didn t keep her  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×