Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • IronGuard

      World of Warships Forum Rules   06/08/2017

        Welcome to the Official World of Warships ASIA forums! These forums are here to provide you with a friendly atmosphere where you can discuss ideas, give and receive game play advice, and discuss any other aspects of World of Warships with other players. Community forums are at their best when participants treat their fellow posters with respect and courtesy. Therefore, we ask that you conduct yourself in a civilized manner when participating on these forums and be mindful of your audience.   The guidelines and rules listed below explain what behaviours is expected of you and what behaviour you can expect from other community members. Note that the following guidelines are not exhaustive, and may not address all manner of offensive behaviour. As such, the forum moderators and administrators shall have full discretion to address any behaviour that they feel is inappropriate. Also, suspension or banishment from the game will always result in the same in regard to forum access. Your access to these forums is a “privilege,” and not a “right.” Wargaming.net reserves the right to suspend your access to these forums at any time for reasons that include, but are not necessarily limited to, your failure to abide by these guidelines.   Wargaming.net reserves the right to evaluate each incident on a case by case basis. The actions taken may be more lenient or more severe than those listed under each category. Before posting any kind of information on this forum, all users are to read the following rules. These rules are obligatory for all registered users on this forum.     1. GENERAL PROVISIONS   1.1 Registration Requirements   There is no requirement for a user to use his or her real name or to use any other form of identification that can be used to easily trace identities, and all e-mail addresses that are provided will be kept private. In order to register on World of Warships forum, registrants must be thirteen (13) years of age or older.   Users are solely responsible for protecting their accounts from access by others. Users are strongly encouraged to select a hard-to-guess password and not re-use that password on any other sites where it may be read by the owners or administrators of that site. It is highly recommended that board users do not share their accounts with others, or share their computers used to access the site with others. In case of a lost or hacked account, users are to inform support immediately.   1.2 Forum purpose   The purpose of this forum is to discuss World of Warships and related topics, get to know fellow players, find a clan to join, and to give feedback to the Wargaming.net developers.   1.3 Responsibility   Wargaming.net is not responsible for any user messages posted. Wargaming.net does not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and is not responsible for the contents of any message. The messages express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of this board. Any user who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to contact the moderation team immediately. Wargaming.net employees and community moderators have the ability to remove objectionable messages and will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time limit, if it is found that removal is necessary. Users agree, through the use of this service, that they will not use this forum to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of any law. Users agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by said user or by this board.   1.4 Sanction Policy   Violations of these rules/guidelines may lead to users being sanctioned temporarily or permanently within this forum or even in game bans of a players account on severe or repetitive offenses.   1.5 Error reporting   Bugs and errors can be reported at the support website (http://support.worldoftanks.asia/), Users can also report any bugs and errors on the corresponding forum thread.     2. PROHIBITIONS and RESTRICTIONS   2.1 Forum etiquette   Users are not allowed to abuse others, make personal attacks or behave disrespectfully. This prohibition applies to both public threads and private messages (PMs).   Disrespect can include but is not limited to: FlamingTrollingHarassment or Defamatory remarksProfanity, Inappropriate language or abbreviations there ofPersonal abuse or attacksRacial, Religious, Sexual, National or Ethnic, slurs or insults, this includes "jokes" in bad taste.Excessive CapitalizationInappropriate or adult content   This behaviour has no place on the World of Warships forums due to its extremely offensive and inappropriate nature.   2.2 Distribution of real life information and real-life threats   Postings and discussions which have users’ personal data (such as addresses, telephone numbers, emails, other contact information) - regardless of whether this is their own or that of other users - will be removed. Users who publish this type of content on the forum will be warned or sanctioned by an administrator or moderator. No rude or disrespectful posts to or about any forum moderators or Wargaming.net employees, as well as no release of real-life information about moderators or Wargaming.net employees are allowed on this forum. Real-life threats include both clear and masked language and/or links to websites containing such language or images which refers to violence in any capacity that is not directly related to the game world   2.3 Advertising   Users are not allowed to post threads or comments that advertise or solicit any non-beneficial, non-Wargaming related businesses, organization, or website. Explicit advertising and solicitation in signatures are also prohibited.   Forum rules allow "light" discussion other games; however any kind of direct promotion, solicitation, or linking to other games is not permitted. Also please do not use images related to games other than World of Warships in your signature, avatar or name.   2.4 Accounts, Gold/Credits, Pre-order & Promotional codes, Leveling services, Begging.   This category includes: Advertising of, or selling of game accounts. Advertising of, or selling of in game currency such as gold/credits. Advertising of, or selling of leveling services. Advertising of, or selling of promotional codes or pre-order codes. Begging in any form. Begging includes but is not limited to: requesting users to transfer real money to the virtual wallet, asking for additional gold/credits, and requests to transfer game gold/credits, promotional codes, pre-order codes, or anything similar. Linking to or promoting websites that contain the above prohibited services.   All types of posts for the sale or promotion of the exchange or transfer of accounts, currency, codes, and other services from one user to another violate the EULA and are prohibited within the forums and game channels.   2.5 Off Topic, spamming and trolling   This category includes: Excessively communicating the same phrase, similar phrases, or pure gibberishCreating threads on topics that already exist on the forums, (Please use search and add to existing topics were possible)Off-topic PostingCreating threads/posts for the sole purpose of causing unrest on the forumsCreating threads/posts for purpose of reporting or discussing in game violations. Such incidences are to be directed to supportCausing disturbances in forum threads, such as picking fights, making off topic posts that ruin the thread, insulting other postersMaking non-constructive posts, or posts with non-constructive topicsAbusing the "Reported Post" feature by sending false alarms or nonsensical messagesNumbering a thread, posting “First!”, “IBTL” (“in before thread lock”) or any other fad statements“Bumping” posts are only permitted in the clan recruiting sections of the forums, please refer to the rules for that section.Petition posts or polls that are not aimed at conducting a discussion.   Users should make sure that they post new threads and postings into the appropriate forum, and users are asked to familiarize themselves with the forums. This helps other users and moderators maintain an overview and to be able to respond faster with an appropriate answer to players questions. Before beginning a new thread, look to see if an active thread on that topic has already been established using the Search feature. If so, place your comments there instead. Keep discussions about one topic to one thread only.   Posts which drift off topic, or content-free posts will be edited or removed. Posting multiple messages with the same content across several forums is unwelcome and inappropriate, since such activities divide the targeted discussions and makes gathering feedback considerably more difficult. Such ‘cross posts’ will be merged, closed and redirected or removed. Before beginning a new thread, look to see if an active thread on that topic has already been established using the Search feature. If so, place your comments there instead. Keep discussions about one topic to one thread only.   2.6 Politics, Major Religions or Religious Figures   Posting about social, religious, political, illegal or other controversial topics that may create offense. As well as negative portrayal of religious and political figures is prohibited within the forums.   2.7 Law Violations   This category includes: Posting discussion threads on, or linking to, cheats, hacks, Trojan horses, or malicious programs. If you suspect that a cheat or hack exists, provide the necessary information to support, it is not to be discussed within the forums.Posting unreleased content / hacking data files: showing unreleased in-game items, equipment, or areas that have been unlocked by hacking into client data files; discussing or displaying any data not available through normal game play;Illegal drugs or activities. Both clear and masked language and/or links to websites containing such language or images which reference to abusing illegal drugs or to performing illegal activities are prohibited.   Users are expected to act lawfully when participating on the forums. Posting about or discussing issues that violate local or international laws is not allowed under any circumstance. The administration reserves the right to delete, update or modify any information which is considered inappropriate on these forums.   2.8 Discussing disciplinary actions   Discussion or disputing of disciplinary actions is prohibited within the forums.   This category includes: Creating posts or threads to discuss or dispute disciplinary actions taken against a player in game or on the forumsCreating posts or threads to discuss or dispute moderators, moderator decisions or actions   Appeals on sanctions received or questions and suggestions relating to rule enforcement are to be submitted to support and are not to be discussed within the forums.   3. MISCELLANEOUS   3.1 Language   The official language of this forum is English. Use of other languages may be allowed in special forum sections only. Users are to be considerate to those who have difficulties with English.   3.2 Hard-to-Read Posts   Posts that disrupt the message boards for other users, intentional or not, are prohibited. This category includes, but is not limited, to: Conducting conversations in foreign languages, outside designated forums Posting excessively in capital letters, Excessive whitespace or line breaks, leet speak, or other hard-to-read writing styles Using misleading topic titles, excessive punctuation, and/or non-standard symbols   While posting on these forums users are to be reasonable with font size and color. Stick to default font size and try to avoid use of text colors different from black. The administration reserves the right to modify inappropriate posts and give warnings to their authors.   3.3 Links and Images   Whenever linking to a website or image or posting an image, be sure to check that they don't violate any of the rules above. Sites or images that display illegal content, pornography, nudity, gratuitous violence, Nazi symbols such as swastikas, obscenities and any other content that goes against the standards of this community will be moderated. In addition to the above we also request you not post ASCII art (pictures created by using letters and symbols on a keyboard) they are usually quite large and can be misinterpreted based on display issues.   The size of files and images referred may not exceed 100 kilobytes (kb).   3.4 Names (Players and Clans), Avatars, Images/Video, Signatures & Clan logos   Certain content for names, avatars, images/video, signatures & clan logos, have no place on the World of Warships forums or within the World of Warships game, due to their extremely offensive, annoying or inappropriate nature. The following list is only a summary, but it gives some idea of names, images, signatures, avatars and clan logos which are not accepted with the World of Warships environment: Names, Avatars, Images/Video, Signatures & Clan logos .... that contains insults, personal attacks, abuse or harassment. that contains unprintable words or abbreviations, or which are unattractive and/or unreadable. which have (in any way) racist or nationalistic implications which may create offense to a certain nation, ethnic, religious or racial group. that contain an allusion of racial or national supremacy, as well as discriminative propaganda on any level. which are derogatory discriminative or offensive to people with a disability or illness. which have an association with sexuality, pedophilia, sexual abuse; or have an offensive connection to the human body or bodily functions. which contain excessive gore or violence, or are obscene/vulgar. which make reference to addictive or illegal substances or their use, or any other illegal activities. which either in whole or partly contain copyrighted or registered trade mark elements. that contain reference to current mainstream religions that may create offense, i.e. names such as God, Jesus, Allah, etc. that contain Logotypes, symbols, emblems or figures connected in one way or another with organizations, that violate or were violating existing laws and rules (For example, using different variations of Nazi symbolic, abridgments and signs as well as credentials, names and surnames of Nazi leaders) which may provoke strong negative reaction/association or promote national/ethnic/religious hatred. that are connected with negative historical or political personalities, first of all those who are judged by international courts for crimes against humanity, those that generally arouse feelings of suffering or disgust in the majority of people, as well as members of currently existing terrorist organizations; that negatively portraits the projects moderators, staff or administration; which in any other manner violates the End User License Agreement or local laws;   ....... either implicitly or explicitly are prohibited (This also contains links to websites containing the above). If names (player or clan), avatars, signatures, images/video, clan logos within the forums or within the game violate these rules the offending account may be changed and/or the accounts may be sanctioned or suspended. Moreover, the administration reserves the right to delete, update or modify any names (player or clans) and avatars, images or clan images which are considered inappropriate on the forums or within the game environment.   Additionally, excessively long forum signatures are not permitted. Signatures may not exceed two lines. If these limitations are exceeded, then the disruptive elements will be removed without explanation and the offending account may receive sanctions. Users are allowed to use images in your signatures, but their size must not exceed 468px×120px (length x width). The signatures can contain animation, but it should not be annoying.   4. FORUM ADMINISTRATION and MODERATION   4.1 Administrators   Administrators are Wargaming.net employees. The administrator status is confirmed by “Group: Administrators, Game Master, Developer, Support” inscription under the user nickname.   4.2 Moderators   Moderators are community contributors (players) Recruited from forum members, the moderators uphold the forum rules, with the Game Master team. The moderator status is confirmed by “Group: "Forum Moderators” inscription under the user nickname.   4.3 Administrators and Moderators’ powers   Administrators and moderators have the right to warn or suspend forum members in the case of forum rules violation. Any measures taken by moderators can be appealed to support via the website (http://asia.wargaming.net/support/), in accordance with the established procedure. Measures taken by administration are not subject to appeal. In some cases, which go beyond the forum rules, administrators can warn or suspend a particular forum member, even if their actions formally don’t fall under the current prohibitions and restrictions.   4.4 Warnings   The warnings and official notifications are set off in red, this font color is reserved by Moderators and Administrators. Any other moderators message is considered to be an ordinary one and is equal to a message of any forum member. Once one of a posts has been moderated, users are not permitted to edit the moderators notes placed within the post. Similarly, the impersonation of the administration or moderating team in any way, is not permitted.   4.5 Restrictions on Administrators and Moderators   Administrators Game Masters Developers and support staff being official employees are representatives of Wargaming.net, they are avid World of Warships players, but do not normally partake in clans and clan wars with the exception of special events.   Moderators however are not official employees of Wargaming.net and recruited from the player base. They have no special abilities in game to give them any advantage, other than the ability to issue chat mutes within the game. Moderators participation within clans or clan-wars is not limited. If users believe a moderator to be biased in any way or acted inappropriately, they are to send the details to support via the website (http://asia.wargaming.net/support/) and it shall be investigated by management.   5. CONTACT LIST   1. Technical Support service (both forum and in-game):   Web form: (http://asia.wargaming.net/support/) for Billing and Payment issues - Billing and Payment department for technical problems and bugs - Technical issues department for forum and game name and password changes - Account Administration department for disputes on game or forum bans, or disputes against moderators or their decisions and actions. for inquiries that don’t suit the above, including reporting hacks, cheats, Trojans, bots etc - In-game general questions department   2. Appeals   The report should contain the complete description of the dispute with the corresponding screenshots attached if needed. Any other ways of appeal are not subject to consideration. Any appeals lodged within the forums are regarded as off-topic.   IMPORTANT   The administration reserves the right to update and modify these rules as the needs of the community dictate to ensure the smooth operation of this community.   Repeatedly violating any area of these Rules or EULA, including the areas detailed above, will often result in permanent suspension from the game and/or forums. This policy is not language-restrictive. Language that falls under this policy will always be subject to the repercussions listed, whether it is inappropriate in English or any other language.   The bottom line is that we want World of Warships to be a fun and safe environment for all players. World of Warships is a Massive Multiplayer Online Game with a mixture of genres, and the key words are “Massively Multiplayer.” While playing this game and posting on its forums, you will encounter thousands of other players who share different experiences and come from vastly different backgrounds. While certain language and images may not be offensive to you, consider the fact that that same language and images may have a completely different effect on someone else. We’ve done everything we can to make this a great game but now it’s up to you, the players, to breathe life into the world.  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
BunnyDragon

DD captain Mains may have a valid Complaint

74 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

370 posts
3,608 battles

Hello Everyone,

 

I've had some extra time on my hands today, (really bad ping) so I decided to do some math on something that I've been hearing from some DD Captains about BB AP on their ships. 

 

I thought they were complaining that AP Overpens were more damaging than HE pens.  I have since learned that this is not the case, but that they are complaining of the pen/overpen mechanic that they are subject too. 

1) They show broadside, BB overpen and do 1k damage, CL/CA kill them in 1 or 2 salvos because broadside. Makes sense, you show broadside, you get punished. 

2) They angle to not die from CL/CA/DD, they get hammered from AP pen from BB.  Wait, this makes no darn sense.  Correct play gets you killed? (Maybe why people in T10 still don't angle cause they learned angling in DD?) 2 ways that you get hammered in the ship?  Not fair.

 

Now, why do BBs only shoot AP?  Bad/lazy play? Forgot what the 1 key is?  Or is it something in the game mechanics?

 

Ship    HE   AP     Pen HE   Overpen AP
Japan                  
                   
Kawachi   5,100   8,100     1683   1012.5
Myogi   5,700   10,000     1881   1250
Ishizuchi   5,200   8,000     1716   1000
Kongo   5,700   10,200     1881   1275
Fuso   5,700   10,200     1881   1275
Mutsu   6,500   12,400     2145   1550
Nagato   6,500   12,600     2145   1575
Amagi   6,500   12,600     2145   1575
Kii   6,500   12,600     2145   1575
Izumo   6,500   12,900     2145   1612.5
Yamato   7,300   14,800     2409   1850
                   
USA                  
                   
South Carolina 4,100   8,100     1353   1012.5
Wyoming   4,200   8,300     1386   1037.5
Arkansas Beta 4,200   8,300     1386   1037.5
New York   5,000   10,300     1650   1287.5
Texas   5,000   10,300     1650   1287.5
New Mexico 5,000   10,500     1650   1312.5
Arizona   5,000   10,300     1650   1287.5
Colorado   5,700   12,400     1881   1550
North Carolina 5,700   13,100     1881   1637.5
Alabama   5,700   13,100     1881   1637.5
Iowa   5,700   13,500     1881   1687.5
Missouri   5,700   13,500     1881   1687.5
Montana   5,700   13,500     1881   1687.5
                   
Germany                  
                   
Nassau   3,200   7,200     1056   900
Konig Albert 3,400   8,300     1122   1037.5
Kaiser   3,500   8,400     1155   1050
Konig     3,500   8,400     1155   1050
Bayern   4,500   10,900     1485   1362.5
Gneisenau 4,400   11,600     1452   1450
Scharnhorst 3,200   7,600     1056   950
Tirpitz   4,400   11,600     1452   1450
Bismarck   4,400   11,600     1452   1450
Friedrich der Große 5,000   13,500     1650   1687.5
Großer Kurfürst 5,000   13,500     1650   1687.5
                   
Russian                  
                   
Imperator Nikolai I 4,500   8,600     1485   1075
Oktyabrskaya Revolutsiya 4,500   8,600     1485   1075
                   
UK                  
                   
Bellerophon 5,200   8,100     1716   1012.5
Orion   5,900   9,500     1947   1187.5
Iron Duke 5,900   9,900     1947   1237.5
Warspite   5,300   11,400     1749   1425
Queen Elizabeth 6,300   11,400     2079   1425
King George V 6,100   10,500     2013   1312.5
Hood   5,300   11,400     1749   1425
Nelson   6,900   12,000     2277   1500
Monarch   6,300   11,900     2079   1487.5
Lion   7,200   13,000     2376   1625
Conqueror 8,200   14,900     2706   1862.5
                   
Italy                  
                   
Giulio Cesare 4,800   9,700     1584   1212.5
                   
France                  
                   
Dunkerque 4,800   9,700     1584   1212.5

 

My theory is, it's the game mechanics.  

As you can see, with the exception of the Brits. Starting in either Tier 6 or Tier 7, you are rewarded for forgetting your HE shells in BB.

The damage output of an HE pen is only slightly more than an AP overpen in most cases from T6 on.  Heck, the Germans have 2 different BB in top (from wiki) that have greater AP overpen than HE pen.  There is literally no reward for BB players to switch ammo type to HE to shoot DD's. 

 

This doesn't make any sense.  In the low tiers, you are taught to switch ammo type.  This is useless in upper tiers. 

Sure you can get a little more damage on a DD with HE pen and a fire, maybe knock a module out or the engines, but then what?  You have to switch back to AP to be a killer again to other ship types.  (Correct play mechanic in my opinion.)

Or, you can shoot AP at the DD, get some hits, do almost as much damage and don't have to switch ammo types with the reload wait. Which is what smart players do. (Incorrect play mechanic in my opinion.) 

 

I do believe, that DD mains, may have a valid complaint about this.  

BB players need to be encouraged to switch ammo types which would 

A) Encourage BB pushing with team (don't have to worry about BB AP if they are shooting DD) 

B) Help to keep CL/CA from instant delete

C) Make average player think more about shots

D) (My opinion) Make game play more interesting. 

E) Ok, just reread A).  It most likely won't as a lot of BBs are scared of whatever. 

 

What's your thoughts?

Honestly Curious about honest thoughts here guys. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,006 posts
7,077 battles

Another thing - if I am in a BB and switch to HE when fighting a DD, I cannot instantly switch targets  and citadel a broadsiding cruiser or BB that enteres my firing angle. 

So the only real benefit of HE is damaging modules. AP overpen causes only slightly less damage than HE pen, sometimes does 3x damage, and allows me to citadel stuff.

It is just not worth the reload time switching to HE just to do more module damage.

Edited by Thyaliad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
370 posts
3,608 battles
10 minutes ago, KirstieBeau said:

I think something's wrong with your computation. AP overpen only deals 10% of the AP max damage. Example is NC. An overpen is just 1310.

Wiki says it's 1/8 of max damage, before saturation/etc. comes into account.

If this is wrong, please link the info. That would completely change the whole argument being made. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
170 posts
5,007 battles
1 minute ago, HeroOfWind said:

i think these screenshots are self-explanatory about the AP-HE switch in general. (and how bs it is currently)

 

lion perfect salvo khab.jpg

13k on sims.jpg

This is the reason why I, a US DD main, stopped playing destroyers recently. DD supposedly counter BB not the other way around. All the radar, hydro, and these BB AP salvos doesn't justify the rewards you get playing DD. That's why I play more BB and cruisers recently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
370 posts
3,608 battles
1 minute ago, KirstieBeau said:

This is the reason why I, a US DD main, stopped playing destroyers recently. DD supposedly counter BB not the other way around. All the radar, hydro, and these BB AP salvos doesn't justify the rewards you get playing DD. That's why I play more BB and cruisers recently.

That's what I've been hearing. But please, where did you hear about the 1/10 overpen with AP?  

The wiki for WOWS has 1/8 overpen which is what all the math is based on. If the math is wrong, then the overpen complaint is not valid if the overpen is lower than showed in the table above.  (Pen still is in my opinion). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
170 posts
5,007 battles
5 minutes ago, BunnyDragon said:

Wiki says it's 1/8 of max damage, before saturation/etc. comes into account.

If this is wrong, please link the info. That would completely change the whole argument being made. 

Even if 1/10 is the correct value, it wouldn't completely change the issue. Firing AP at DD is still the better choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
170 posts
5,007 battles
5 minutes ago, BunnyDragon said:

That's what I've been hearing. But please, where did you hear about the 1/10 overpen with AP?  

The wiki for WOWS has 1/8 overpen which is what all the math is based on. If the math is wrong, then the overpen complaint is not valid if the overpen is lower than showed in the table above.  (Pen still is in my opinion). 

http://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Gunnery_%26_Armor_Penetration

 

 

overpen.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
370 posts
3,608 battles
3 minutes ago, KirstieBeau said:

Even if 1/10 is the correct value, it wouldn't completely change the issue. Firing AP at DD is still the better choice.

Actually it makes a big difference.

1/10 overpen for Montana is 1350 for a 500 damage per shot difference, (this could be the difference between a kill or not if HE is used correctly) then bad play is part of the problem for the overuse of AP (myself included) vs not a real difference between ammo choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,006 posts
7,077 battles
28 minutes ago, BunnyDragon said:

That's what I've been hearing. But please, where did you hear about the 1/10 overpen with AP?  

The wiki for WOWS has 1/8 overpen which is what all the math is based on. If the math is wrong, then the overpen complaint is not valid if the overpen is lower than showed in the table above.  (Pen still is in my opinion). 

It says in the wiki here that overpens do 10% damage. Under the AP section.

http://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Gunnery_%26_Armor_Penetration

Never heard of that 1/8 value before. I think that is an error.

But I have to agree it doesn't change much. Are you willing to go into a 30s reload and give up the chance to do 3x damage and the potential to damage other non-DD targets just do to marginally more damage and module hits?

It is better to just stick to AP. Personally I only switch to HE in a BB if the enemy DD I am fighting is the last enemy left in the area. 

Edited by Thyaliad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
249 posts
11,039 battles

The exact problem in my opinion is, current games mechanics are broken and need to be overhauled.
HE is effortless round, just spam it and it will set on fire dealing devastating damage.
AP is alpha spike round, Situational but stupidly powerful if used correctly.

AP BB vs DD shinanigans is a results from "Overmatch Mechanics" and "Underwater Penetration"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Problems with AP on BB against DD is DD armor plate (beside Khabarovsk which is another matter to discuss) has maximum 21 mm which will get overmatched by any AP shell that has diamater > 305 mm. Thus BB always damage DD regardless of angle you get hit which mean AP is better than HE when used against DD, plus BB has long reload so there is excuse to not swapping AP to HE (but if you get hit by HE you still get devastated regardless).

For under water penetration, BB AP when land on water near DD it will arm when contacted, BB has 0.033 (0.015s for RN BB) s arming time which mean BB AP will dive and penetrate hull and arm inside ship which equal to normal penetration (33% maximum damage). This is why AP is better than HE, if HE land near DD its exploded on contact and instead of damaging ship it will capacitate module instead (which is better than get raw damage on DD side)

WG approach about making AP overpen on DD only is bullcrap and nonesense and it only solve symptom, not root cause.

There are many things I want to discuss and demonstrate my though on game mechanics (AP and HE especially) but I'll add it up later on because it will be long article to write and refine them will take days or weeks.

 

Edited by New_Horizontal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
170 posts
5,007 battles
8 minutes ago, BunnyDragon said:

Actually it makes a big difference.

1/10 overpen for Montana is 1350 for a 500 damage per shot difference, (this could be the difference between a kill or not if HE is used correctly) then bad play is part of the problem for the overuse of AP (myself included) vs not a real difference between ammo choice.

I' d rather roll the dice with AP. Either you get a bunch of overpens which deal relatively decent damage, or you get that one or two pens that completely devastate the poor DD player. It's so frustrating if you switch to HE, and right before your guns get reloaded, that DD will fall into concealment and you have a broadside cruiser next to it and you have HE loaded. :cap_fainting:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,491 posts
6,984 battles
6 minutes ago, BunnyDragon said:

Actually it makes a big difference.

1/10 overpen for Montana is 1350 for a 500 damage per shot difference, (this could be the difference between a kill or not if HE is used correctly) then bad play is part of the problem for the overuse of AP (myself included) vs not a real difference between ammo choice.

 

It is not a bad play, nor a lazy play. Battleships do not see Destroyers for much long, they usually go into stealth between two reloads. Switching between AP and HE is not optimal because by the time you get your shells ready its very clear that for the most part, you are no longer detecting the destroyer. HE is not very good for most of the battleships in the game to shoot other classes. AP overpen from shells are still better than HE salvos where there are chances that the modules blocking the HE shells and literally doing nothing. Technically HE salvos should rate higher total damage since they don't overpen, so basically 1/3 of max HE damage which is roughly 1/2 of max AP damage. So, for each shell, if max AP damage is something like M, overpen does M/10 and HE pen does roughly M/6. This is fine on paper, but the reality is totally opposite. HE mechanics is wonky at best.

 

And WG Wiki never works, sadly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 posts
2,972 battles

Wasn't it the case that owing to an error in the game engine, BB AP was doing full pen on destroyers in certain instances when the shells hit the water, then go on and hit the ship?

 

I think the problem is very high penetration damage, much higher than 1/10, is randomly affecting DDs. There were a couple of recorded instances of DD's taking massive damage from only one ap hit. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
894 posts
3,637 battles

DDs are still good for capping and influencing the battle, however, it just doesn't work when you eat a 5k AP pen damage from your butt while running away. I'm already reducing my escape time by sitting butt into cap, with engine boost ready to go, but I get spotted for 5 secs and a BB can get their salvo off. If 1 AP hits my butt, that's 5k HP gone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
747 posts
6,234 battles
2 hours ago, HeroOfWind said:

i think these screenshots are self-explanatory about the AP-HE switch in general. (and how bs it is currently)

 

lion perfect salvo khab.jpg

13k on sims.jpg

 

To be fair, Khaba deserves every bit of it, don't know about the sims though.

Edited by Admiral_Neptulussus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,411 posts
16,780 battles
1 minute ago, Admiral_Neptulussus said:

 

To be fair, Khaba deserves every bit of it, don't know about the sims though.

every dd suffer from this, at every tier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
370 posts
3,608 battles
8 minutes ago, FishyPower said:

DDs are still good for capping and influencing the battle, however, it just doesn't work when you eat a 5k AP pen damage from your butt while running away. I'm already reducing my escape time by sitting butt into cap, with engine boost ready to go, but I get spotted for 5 secs and a BB can get their salvo off. If 1 AP hits my butt, that's 5k HP gone.

Agree, and I don't play dd.  

I think that AP pen from BB needs to be changed regarding DD and HE use encouraged.  (Sure you hit DD, but he got options left from AP hit.  HE, then massive pen damage. Correct play/risk rewarded.)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
894 posts
3,637 battles
19 minutes ago, BunnyDragon said:

Agree, and I don't play dd.  

I think that AP pen from BB needs to be changed regarding DD and HE use encouraged.  (Sure you hit DD, but he got options left from AP hit.  HE, then massive pen damage. Correct play/risk rewarded.)

 

Yep.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
184 posts
3,049 battles

My view on this is a little different.

If you are a DD, you should learn to expect an unhappy time if you end up detected at business end of a BB's main turrets. It doesn't really matter if those 16" shells are HE or AP, your only hope is that you get lucky: the shells either miss, or, for AP, pass clean through... which they might, or, especially coming through the ship bow to stern, might not.

The game mechanics are fair and realistic as they are: BB's can take you out with whatever they have in the barrel, but HE gives a small advantage. A DD should not be made impervious to AP shells. That would be terrible. A DD's defense is concealment, and to a lesser extent, small size and maneuverability. Once the heavy shells start connecting you done messed up and that should be the end of you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
894 posts
3,637 battles
1 hour ago, Rina_Pon said:

My view on this is a little different.

If you are a DD, you should learn to expect an unhappy time if you end up detected at business end of a BB's main turrets. It doesn't really matter if those 16" shells are HE or AP, your only hope is that you get lucky: the shells either miss, or, for AP, pass clean through... which they might, or, especially coming through the ship bow to stern, might not.

The game mechanics are fair and realistic as they are: BB's can take you out with whatever they have in the barrel, but HE gives a small advantage. A DD should not be made impervious to AP shells. That would be terrible. A DD's defense is concealment, and to a lesser extent, small size and maneuverability. Once the heavy shells start connecting you done messed up and that should be the end of you.

 

But the thing is, your maneuverability doesn't do anything. At 10km, you can expect to eat a salvo for AP shells. Plus, 5 seconds is a reasonable time to escape from detection, but a BB can switch targets with 5 secs. It doesn't help when you hide in your smoke cause the enemy DD is also there in cap with you, then all of a sudden, radar and you die. I know radar is pretty hard to use, but bloody hell, the radars at high tiers are [content removed]. 10km detection range + the 3km that a DD is typically away from his fleet. That's pretty safe a distance already.

 

Inappropriate/derogatory. Post edited, user sanctioned.

~amade

Edited by amade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
419 posts
7,282 battles
4 hours ago, icy_phoenix said:

 

It is not a bad play, nor a lazy play. Battleships do not see Destroyers for much long, they usually go into stealth between two reloads. Switching between AP and HE is not optimal because by the time you get your shells ready its very clear that for the most part, you are no longer detecting the destroyer. HE is not very good for most of the battleships in the game to shoot other classes. AP overpen from shells are still better than HE salvos where there are chances that the modules blocking the HE shells and literally doing nothing. Technically HE salvos should rate higher total damage since they don't overpen, so basically 1/3 of max HE damage which is roughly 1/2 of max AP damage. So, for each shell, if max AP damage is something like M, overpen does M/10 and HE pen does roughly M/6. This is fine on paper, but the reality is totally opposite. HE mechanics is wonky at best.

 

And WG Wiki never works, sadly.

Basically this. By the time you switch ammo the DD is gone, so shoot whatever you got in the barrels. Yeah DDs can take a nasty amount of damage from BB AP, but the better DD players I've seen generally don't put themselves in that position.

I don't play DDs all that much but I can manage to not get sunk by BBs like this (unless I make a silly mistake) when playing my DDs. Generally you have to be fairly close for a BB to be able to hit you without the possibility of dodging, and you have stealth and smoke to use for evasion. It does get much harder the higher tier you play.

Switching ammunition by removing a shell and reloading a new one was never done on ships because of practicality, they always fired the guns to clear them before loading a new ammo type. In fact guns bigger than a certain size should be unable to change ammo if a shell is already loaded.

1 hour ago, FishyPower said:

 

But the thing is, your maneuverability doesn't do anything. At 10km, you can expect to eat a salvo for AP shells. Plus, 5 seconds is a reasonable time to escape from detection, but a BB can switch targets with 5 secs. It doesn't help when you hide in your smoke cause the enemy DD is also there in cap with you, then all of a sudden, radar and you die. I know radar is pretty hard to use, but bloody hell, the radars at high tiers are [content removed] . 10km detection range + the 3km that a DD is typically away from his fleet. That's pretty safe a distance already.

If you're in a situation like that I'd think escaping a bit earlier rather than trying to fight would be a better option, of course leaving some fish to make the enemies think. That would be a bad situation even without the BB in the equation. Oh and 5 seconds turret rotation for most BBs is not that far for many BBs, they'd have to have their guns pointing roughly in your general direction to be able to do that.

Personally when in a DD I tend to save smoke as a trump card in an escape, or to cover an ally. If I see smoke I send torps if I have them. I've seen so many DDs camp in their smoke in a cap only to be torpedoed or caught out with radar/hydro. It's a common strategy but it's probably not the best way of going about capping.

 

Quote updated.

~amade

Edited by amade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×