Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
tics

IFHE and smoke changes

24 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

6
[PEEDZ]
Member
22 posts
6,005 battles

Surprised this hasn't been posted yet.

Some changes to IFHE and smoke.

Reddit:

https://www.reddit.com/r/WorldOfWarships/comments/6ugxin/wows_dev_blog_in_st_ifhe_affects_detection/?ref=share&ref_source=link

NA forums:

https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/134292-even-more-info-on-the-wip-smoke-changes-ifhe-changes/

Everything in testing, so nothing confirmed, but looks like IFHE will have little chance of fires..

And bb will no longer be able to fire from smoke undetected (hope links work)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
870
[MRI]
Member
1,978 posts
11,113 battles

The changes look good so far.

I think 8% penalty on IFHE is a bit too much though, but individual numbers can be refined.

Overall I like the idea behind the changes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
275
[LBAS]
Member
2,168 posts
10,991 battles

AP Bombs soon on 0.7.0?

:^)

i would laugh at them smashing them with Armor Piercing bombs and Regain the CV population 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
275
[LBAS]
Member
2,168 posts
10,991 battles

Duca D Aosta will be Garbage as usual, as well as the USSR Cruisers.

Even though they want to make their own Nation needs to be nerfed hard too. :cap_book:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,120 posts

IFHE fire reduction chance shouldnt AFFECT SECONDARIES!!! now Bismarck and GK have 0% chance of causing fire

 

dilemma.....

delete IFHE..... unreliable secondary damage

use IFHE..... no fire.....

 

WG already nerf the Bismarck secondary damage and fire chance.... what now? another secondary nerf?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
275
[LBAS]
Member
2,168 posts
10,991 battles
Just now, Skarhabek said:

IFHE fire reduction chance shouldnt AFFECT SECONDARIES!!! now Bismarck and GK have 0% chance of causing fire

 

dilemma.....

delete IFHE..... unreliable secondary damage

use IFHE..... no fire.....

 

WG already nerf the Bismarck secondary damage and fire chance.... what now? another secondary nerf?

Guess it's time to make CV rise and shine to get those BB smashed wit AP Bombs at them

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,120 posts
10 minutes ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:

Guess it's time to make CV rise and shine to get those BB smashed wit AP Bombs at them

it wont be happen, since manual AA is to strong. also the AP bomb only affect yolo BB like German and few BB. its only make yolo BB lazier to YOLO because AP bomb.

 

the great solution is to nerf manual AA on BB to become 25% for BB, 50% on DD, 75% on CV and still 100% on CA.

also reduce AA range in smoke only max 2km, why smoked ship can see where is the plane?

and PLEASE LOWER DAMAGE of CV TORPEDO on T4~T5 by 50% and 40%.... also reduce strafe damage and BRING BACK manual aim :V

another MM fix, there is only 1 CV for T4 and T5.... imagine 2 langley striking poor myogi, even with auto aim, its still killing it.

 

___________________

 

btw, i think IFHE change its HUGE NERF FOR BELFAST.... huahahahaaaha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
275
[LBAS]
Member
2,168 posts
10,991 battles
Just now, Skarhabek said:

it wont be happen, since manual AA is to strong. also the AP bomb only affect yolo BB like German and few BB. its only make yolo BB lazier to YOLO because AP bomb.

 

the great solution is to nerf manual AA on BB to become 25% for BB, 50% on DD, 75% on CV and still 100% on CA.

also reduce AA range in smoke only max 2km, why smoked ship can see where is the plane?

and PLEASE LOWER DAMAGE of CV TORPEDO on T4~T5 by 50% and 40%.... also reduce strafe damage and BRING BACK manual aim :V

another MM fix, there is only 1 CV for T4 and T5.... imagine 2 langley striking poor myogi, even with auto aim, its still killing it.

 

___________________

 

btw, i think IFHE change its HUGE NERF FOR BELFAST.... huahahahaaaha

I think Manual AA skill will be removed since its not common for anything lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
263
[LUOMU]
Super Tester
1,420 posts
10,753 battles

IMO 2/6/10 for DD/CL(CA)/BB is more reasonable, 8% is a bit too much for some CLs with low chance of fire

The new smoke change is at least better than the old idea which was pretty much the worst idea one can think of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,120 posts
49 minutes ago, _Halcyon said:

IMO 2/6/10 for DD/CL(CA)/BB is more reasonable, 8% is a bit too much for some CLs with low chance of fire

The new smoke change is at least better than the old idea which was pretty much the worst idea one can think of.

why BB pick IFHE? i dont think BB IFHE should be nerfed because its for SECONDARY BUILD! now they nerf more the secondary.....

 

geezzee lets become sniper

 

33 minutes ago, Shiroyasha_Gintoki said:

My Mogami is crying in the corner right now when she heard about the IFHE changes...

pick 203mm now and join our 203mm algerie brotherhood :V

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
270
[LEAK]
Beta Tester
2,718 posts
1,988 battles

Notice how this is yet another HUGE buff to Battleships.

 

Not directly, but indirectly - WG you genius-es :D

 

Instead of buffing CA, noooooo lets nerf IFHE, because too many BBabys don't like good CL rekting their precious Battleships.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
263
[LUOMU]
Super Tester
1,420 posts
10,753 battles
1 hour ago, Shiroyasha_Gintoki said:

My Mogami is crying in the corner right now when she heard about the IFHE changes...

2600 Alpha HE damage still works superb, that's more DPM than Hindenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
768
[HMAS_]
Member
1,880 posts
12,472 battles
2 hours ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:

Guess it's time to make CV rise and shine to get those BB smashed wit AP Bombs at them

 

NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :Smile_hiding:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,795
[SGC]
Super Tester
7,897 posts
8,258 battles
15 hours ago, Alvin1020 said:

Notice how this is yet another HUGE buff to Battleships.

 

Not directly, but indirectly - WG you genius-es :D

 

Instead of buffing CA, noooooo lets nerf IFHE, because too many BBabys don't like good CL rekting their precious Battleships.

 

I'm pretty sure you are one of the crybabies about imaginary BB crybabies. In this forum, I am yet to see BB players crying about IFHE, they have lot more HP. Cruisers are the ones who gets murdered by IFHE these days. Any player with brain targets cruisers first instead of battleships. Besides IFHE makes no sense anyway. It's a buff for every other classes that is not a CL, or some specific DDs, like Akizuki / Harekaze.  Also, I don't see any reason to buff CA right now. Most of the high tier CAs (specially TX CA) are absolutely fantastic. And the other lower tier ones are boring to play anyway. May be Notser will be disappointed (may be you too) cause he was the only one who was using IFHE with CAs. (Even more useless than Sharkbait's RDF on CAs).

 

17 hours ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:

Guess it's time to make CV rise and shine to get those BB smashed wit AP Bombs at them

 

With only one problem, 80% of CV playerbase is absolute garbage and they just ruin the game for the whole team. I'm all for smashing / whacking BBs, but not by promoting a class that tend to have that much garbage (and too many fishermen at high tiers).

Edited by icy_phoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
275
[LBAS]
Member
2,168 posts
10,991 battles

@icy_phoenix that might be true, but I'm also guessing that 0.6.10 or even 0.7.0 marks the AP bombs for both IJN and USN CVs

Using AP bombs be like:

"Lemme Smash"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
65
[KCSEA]
Member
127 posts
6,042 battles

This is actually a very good change. 
The new smoke mechanics means no more smoke-camping BBs and cruisers whacking everything in their flank without retaliation.
And the IFHE changes puts CLs back to their places, as IFHE CLs had made CA guns rather inferior.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
733 posts
3,155 battles
2 hours ago, Ryuuoh_DeltaPlus said:

And the IFHE changes puts CLs back to their places, as IFHE CLs had made CA guns rather inferior.

pretty sure Atlanta/Flint is unaffected by this change...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,795
[SGC]
Super Tester
7,897 posts
8,258 battles
17 hours ago, Shiroyasha_Gintoki said:

pretty sure Atlanta/Flint is unaffected by this change...

 

Or, UK CLs, hahahaha... IFHE never worked for them in the first place :P Still superior than most other CAs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
3,533 posts
7,869 battles
On 21/8/2560 at 4:34 PM, icy_phoenix said:

 

Or, UK CLs, hahahaha... IFHE never worked for them in the first place :P Still superior than most other CAs.

UK is only AP shell aren't they? what about Perth and Payfast? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
870
[MRI]
Member
1,978 posts
11,113 battles
23 minutes ago, THAI_THIEF said:

UK is only AP shell aren't they? what about Perth and Payfast? 

Payfast will be hurting. You could argue that this change is intended to hit the Belfast and Kutuzov badly. Unfortunately the Perth will be hit too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×