Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
BravaZulu296

[POLL] Should Conqueror keep 457mm

Should Conqueror keep 457mm  

37 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Conqueror keep 457mm

    • Yes
      29
    • No
      8

10 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

29
[CIWS]
Member
355 posts

Although it's not final maybe if enough people vote yes WG won't implement Conqueror as another Montana, or at least have 457mm as researchable

Edited by BravaZulu296

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
219
[BOTES]
Modder
601 posts
4,485 battles

I see where did the uproars comes from, but I don't think we should over interpret WG's changes to a ship still in super-testing phase. \

However, it would be nice if they can implement the ship with alternative loadouts (like GK and FdG) 

Edited by 9mm1n
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,285
[LBAS]
[LBAS]
Modder, Member
6,558 posts
40,297 battles
5 minutes ago, 9mm1n said:

However, it would be nice if they can implement the ship with alternative loadouts (like GK and FdG) 

yeah I love 4x2 Conqueror at the first sight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
131
[LLBC]
[LLBC]
Member
747 posts
7,085 battles

While 457mm won't pen 32mm bow, but it is enough to make a differnce on several cruisers' 30mm decks. So I vote for keeping the 457.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,914
[REPOI]
[REPOI]
Member
6,343 posts
26,092 battles

keep the 457s, the 412s are too stupidly good

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29
[REPOI]
Super Tester_
420 posts
12,676 battles

inb4 WG gives Conqueror same treatment as Mogami so she can mount either

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24
[BRU]
Member
279 posts
2,796 battles
On 7/7/2017 at 10:03 AM, BravaZulu296 said:

at least have 457mm as researchable

 

This I would agree to. Either choose between 457mm with a long reload, or 419mm with better RoF.

 

But 419mm is still bigger than Montana's guns, so... :Smile_hiding:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44
[KMS-A]
Member
307 posts
6,556 battles

either 419 with great accuracy (on par yamato) vs 457 with bad accuracy (below kurfurst) this probably doesn't work but I want better accuracy than the Gk because the Germans need better accuracy and I would play them for eternity which is why I want to avenge them via the British battleships.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,860 posts
7,384 battles
On ‎7‎/‎10‎/‎2017 at 1:41 PM, ellofiend said:

either 419 with great accuracy (on par yamato) vs 457 with bad accuracy (below kurfurst) this probably doesn't work but I want better accuracy than the Gk because the Germans need better accuracy and I would play them for eternity which is why I want to avenge them via the British battleships.

Shouldn't it be the other way around, 12 guns with less accuracy but more shells and 8 shells for better accuracy

edit: oops auto correct did weird stuff

Edited by FenrirApalis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44
[KMS-A]
Member
307 posts
6,556 battles
2 minutes ago, FenrirApalis said:

Shouldn't I Team Battles be the other way around, 12 guns with less accuracy but more shells and 8 shells for better accuracy

yeah, thats what i meant ><

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×