Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
BIGCOREMKP0I

USS Enterprise is seriously underpowered

47 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Member
1,196 posts
2,883 battles

No big surprise.

WarGaming man. Only IJN CVs are allowed to be good/ competitive. Even the most decorated ship of the entire war is worthless compared to its counterpart because War Gaming says so

I'm pretty frustrated as well, but what can I do ?
Move along people, Nothing out of the ordinary here, just another example of anti USN CV policy from War Gaming..

 

Edited by silenthunter19944

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
283 posts
3,583 battles

Nothing out of the ordinary here hey!, I thought I chase would have known after all this time?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
823 posts
4,972 battles

WG hasn't got a single clue as to what they're doing with CV's so now it's all just gimmicks!

T7 CV with tier 9 aircraft

T7 CV with tier 6 aircraft

M drop pattern on torpedoes

W drop pattern on torpedoes

 

What's next WG, adding radar or some smoke to CV's? lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,837 posts
8,068 battles
Just now, BravaZulu296 said:

Wow enterprise is so underpowered...

 

I still think it's better than Saratoga Lexington though. How is WG making profit in America btw if they hate USN so much?

They won 2 wars, so Enterprise making her a scrapheap to bunch to make the Axis wins

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
346 posts
Just now, BIGCOREMKP0I said:

They won 2 wars, so Enterprise making her a scrapheap to bunch to make the Axis wins

 

So true, still curious on how they make money in america by being anti USN though..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
280 posts
3,514 battles

yup they really need to buff this ship since it's shit right now

also wouldn't it be nice if they add the USS Wasp as tier 7? I heard that it's size is smaller than yorktowns and similar to POWER RANGERS!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,837 posts
8,068 battles
Just now, Vorshlaghammer666 said:

yup they really need to buff this ship since it's shit right now

also wouldn't it be nice if they add the USS Wasp as tier 7? I heard that it's size is smaller than yorktowns and similar to POWER RANGERS!

The Phantom Fortress is already in the game files, i doubt its USS Hornet, with XF5U Bomber Pancakes and Woobat Fighters

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
280 posts
3,514 battles
16 hours ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:

The Phantom Fortress is already in the game files, i doubt its USS Hornet, with XF5U Bomber Pancakes and Woobat Fighters

hope they give it for free and has a similar event as the hunt for bismarck

oh wait.. Isn't the Hornet a Tier 9?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,837 posts
8,068 battles
2 minutes ago, Vorshlaghammer666 said:

hope they give it for free and has a similar event as the hunt for bismarck

oh wait.. Isn't the Hornet a Tier 9?

Tier V as the Phantom Fortress, Actually, if its a CV split, she'll be a Tier VII One (Regular or Premium, although she lack speed), she's one of those Yorktown Class

Hornet carry Moonbat Fighters, except they only have 3 units per squadron same as the Saipan

Edited by BIGCOREMKP0I

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
280 posts
3,514 battles
16 hours ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:

Tier V as the Phantom Fortress, Actually, if its a CV split, she'll be a Tier VII One (Regular or Premium, although she lack speed), she's one of those Yorktown Class

Hornet carry Moonbat Fighters, except they only have 3 units per squadron same as the Saipan

3 units.. well that sucks.

oh btw for the enterprise..

where's the nacelle warp drive and photon torps!!?

Edited by Vorshlaghammer666

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,837 posts
8,068 battles
Just now, Vorshlaghammer666 said:

3 units.. well that sucks.

Occasionally.. These were planned on the USS Hornet and The USS Wasp, XP-67 Moonbat, the plans said it can replace the F4U Corsair or the F6F Hellcat, trials were started during wwii

nf0603.gif

The drawbacks were this prototype were too fast and have low reaction time but they deal superior damage on aircraft, these are Fighter Bombers but they count as Multiroles

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
280 posts
3,514 battles
16 hours ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:

Occasionally.. These were planned on the USS Hornet and The USS Wasp, XP-67 Moonbat, the plans said it can replace the F4U Corsair or the F6F Hellcat, trials were started during wwii

nf0603.gif

The drawbacks were this prototype were too fast and have low reaction time but they deal superior damage on aircraft, these are Fighter Bombers but they count as Multiroles

 

A number of armament configurations were considered including six .50 in (12.7 mm) machine guns, four 20 mm (.79 in) cannon, and even a 75 mm (2.95 in) cannon before the configuration of six 37 mm (1.46 in) M4 cannon was chosen

holy shit! that's a lot of weight to go around!! it can even obliterate a whole Japanese squad in a mere seconds!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,837 posts
8,068 battles
Just now, Vorshlaghammer666 said:

A number of armament configurations were considered including six .50 in (12.7 mm) machine guns, four 20 mm (.79 in) cannon, and even a 75 mm (2.95 in) cannon before the configuration of six 37 mm (1.46 in) M4 cannon was chosen

holy shit! that's a lot of weight to go around!! it can even obliterate a whole Japanese squad in a mere seconds!

Much Powerful as the F4U Corsair, the Moonbat can also destroy ships like Escorts, and Destroyers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
280 posts
3,514 battles
16 hours ago, BIGCOREMKP0I said:

Much Powerful as the F4U Corsair, the Moonbat can also destroy ships like Escorts, and Destroyers

haha I wonder what the enemy cv player's face be like if they encounter this plane in game

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
460 posts
8,344 battles

I'm not convinced it's really all that under powered given the game he showed. 185k+ of damage is not insignificant. Perhaps he should have shown one of the games where he did suffer, that would be much more convincing.

Also I'm not a big fan of expecting every premium ship to be competitive/powerful. That's how we've ended up with OP ships like the Bellfast and Saipan. As long as it's fun to play and hopefully not stupidly OP/UP it should be ok. Not every ship has to fit into the competitive scene. It's almost like iChase and others _want_ the game to be p2w.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,837 posts
8,068 battles
5 minutes ago, Vorshlaghammer666 said:

haha I wonder what the enemy cv player's face be like if they encounter this plane in game

Some contributors in NA have encountered this since Halloween on 2015, The Moonbat, it can destroy half of the Enemy Fighters (4 or 5) for instance, bombers too.

Edited by BIGCOREMKP0I

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,837 posts
8,068 battles
21 minutes ago, Vorshlaghammer666 said:

3 units.. well that sucks.

oh btw for the enterprise..

where's the nacelle warp drive and photon torps!!?

Either SB2C Helldivers and TBM-3 bombers with Operation Ten-go pack will be adjusted for her (I'm so sorry for putting this joke in) :Smile_hiding:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
295 posts
6,613 battles

i'm not surprised, the midway is supposed to be the yamato of the carriers, but look at that ship in the game now.
but i think enterprise might be a test bed for WG to try balancing carrier gameplay, this ship could be the future of USN carrier gameplay, i hope enterprise is more competitive in the future

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1,837 posts
8,068 battles
Just now, Teostra said:

i'm not surprised, the midway is supposed to be the yamato of the carriers, but look at that ship in the game now.
but i think enterprise might be a test bed for WG to try balancing carrier gameplay, this ship could be the future of USN carrier gameplay, i hope enterprise is more competitive in the future

CV-6 Participated on the Attack of the Final Fleet of the Nihon desu Yamato, so that means she needs her SB2Cs and TBM-3s historical accuracy loadouts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×