Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
IJN_Akashi

Matchmaker still broken

35 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[IMSDF]
Beta Tester
218 posts
4,648 battles

Photo says it all

 

CzGDpRG.jpg

 

please fix this as so--- oh wait, WG never had a plan to fix MM ever....................cuz them lazy devs as usual....

 

 

:honoring:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Super Tester
516 posts
5,751 battles

How its broken? Cant see any problems

your tier4 CV will ONLY match in tier7 when 2 platoon do the same thing

thats why u shouldnt team up with others in different tiers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
139
[BOTES]
Member
439 posts
3,955 battles

What did you expect? Do you really think the match maker would give you the Tier 4-5 game? And how's Wargaming devs "lazy" when it's your own fault.

Edited by 9mm1n

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Super Tester
2,725 posts

Fail div - Dev no need to fix the players-made issue. Only players can fixed themselves.

Unequal number of destroyer - known issue already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Super Tester
419 posts
4,214 battles

For the gazillion time

MM take the highest tier into consideration first

The carrier div mate protected MM are put second

Only when there is no T4 carrier div with another T5 ship, the MM find the match with the protected MM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
1 post
7,937 battles

>inb4 "you still don't know about game mechanics", "we always play and win in this division but this MM should not happen cuz we are experiencedzz" replies from OP (just like in reddit)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[LBAS]
Member
4,473 posts
25,644 battles

"Kraken Unleashed"

 

"Die-Hard" --> "Detonation" --> "It's just a flesh wound" --> "Liquidator" -->  "Double Strike"

:trollface: what is the sheep

Edited by MatterCore

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
63 posts
1,554 battles

Ho ho ho.

 

You funny, funny guys, rolling out the exact same disrespect to an OP because you've seen it all before and in your lofty opinions, there's nothing wrong.

 

Where the hell are you getting two fail div from? The two divs I see are on the opposite team and not the same tier as the OP.

 

And if the matchmaking system isn't broken then why have WG introduced an improvement that ensures that there are always less higher tier vehicles than lower tier vehicles in World of Tanks random matches?

 

Considering that it's not unusual for a div of tier 6s to be the only tier 6s in a predominantly tier 8 match in WOWS, and that WoT now has what appears to be a far better MM formula, how can you lot keep rolling out your tired old arguments and OP put-downs?

 

Surely you can't spin the BS MM algorithm WOWS employs as being acceptable in that scenario, especially when no premiums are involved?

 

It's about time you lot stopped bashing because it's trendy, grow some balls and some brains and actually think a response through instead of knee-jerk reacting and running out your same tired old answers. They don't always hold true.

 

.

Edited by Captain_Fathom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Video Contributor
860 posts
10,965 battles

Ho ho ho.

 

You funny, funny guys, rolling out the exact same disrespect to an OP because you've seen it all before and in your lofty opinions, there's nothing wrong.

 

Where the hell are you getting two fail div from? The two divs I see are on the opposite team and not the same tier as the OP.

 

And if the matchmaking system isn't broken then why have WG introduced an improvement that ensures that there are always less higher tier vehicles than lower tier vehicles in World of Tanks random matches?

 

Considering that it's not unusual for a div of tier 6s to be the only tier 6s in a predominantly tier 8 match in WOWS, and that WoT now has what appears to be a far better MM formula, how can you lot keep rolling out your tired old arguments and OP put-downs?

 

Surely you can't spin the BS MM algorithm WOWS employs as being acceptable in that scenario, especially when no premiums are involved?

 

It's about time you lot stopped bashing because it's trendy, grow some balls and some brains and actually think a response through instead of knee-jerk reacting and running out your same tired old answers. They don't always hold true.

 

.

 

Man you look old, might want to get those eyes checked first.

 

Both sides faildivs a T4 CV and T5 BB and get pulled into T7 matches.

MM works by taking account the highest tier ship in a division and do the balancing accordingly. It doesn't care about other ships in the division. It always works that way since the beginning.

By queueing a T4 CV with a T5 AA spec BB, this is clearly an attempt to rig the MM to get an advantage over the other team. Tell me if that's 'fine and dandy'

Unfortunately the division on the other team also had the same idea. Of course MM will match them up.

Bonus points for MM to put all 4 chaps in a T7 match. They deserve it.

 

If you faildiv you deserve to be uptiered.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×