Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
peelapple

Us cv upgrade

2 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Member
2 posts
1,613 battles

I think us cv 7 8 tree need 2 1 1 aircraft module 

And dive bomber radius circle same as japan asap

Y <content removed> america us main deal divebomber radius circle bigger than japan???

<content removed> really hate america and midway armor and aa is not same historical

Plz 

 

Insults to Wargaming, Profanity, Duplicate Post. Thread Locked. User Sanctioned.

~ADM_dude_SG

Edited by ADM_dude_SG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Member
49 posts
6,861 battles

Don't create double post please. http://forum.worldofwarships.asia/index.php?/topic/21727-need-berf-us-cv-dive-bomber-bombing-radius/page__pid__280042#entry280042

 

My opinion about some of this problem, in other topic.

http://forum.worldofwarships.asia/index.php?/topic/20804-uss-carrier-damage-too-low/page__pid__279038#entry279038

 

And dive bomber radius circle same as japan asap

Y <content removed> america us main deal divebomber radius circle bigger than japan???

 

Tier 4 US CV, Langley had smaller/ tighter drop radius than IJN (97-234m) but only had 250lbs bombs (Tier 3-4 DB plane), have far less penetration chance than IJN but they have more damage (5400 vs 4600)

And Tier 5-7 CV, except saipan. With T5-7 DB plane had 500lbs of bombs with far more damage than IJN bombs (7500, IJN just 4600), but have less penetration damage chance than IJN.

And tier 7 (Saipan), 8-10 CV with T8+ DB plane had 1000lbs of bombs have very great penetration and damaging chance, also fire chance. No one armor can prevent it's to give massive damage (10800 damage potential per bombs) (except heavy armoured turret such as cruisers or Battleships)

 

500 and 1000lbs US bombs have 142-355m dispersion, wider than IJN.

All IJN just have 4 DB plane per squad, and US have 6 per squad, an US Saipan have 8 per quad make US easier to get more hit with wider dispersion.

With AS skill, every quad will have 1 more plane.

All IJN DB just have 551lbs bombs, with tighter 134-335mm (far more fire chance than US 250lbs, and maybe more fire chance than 500lbs, and far less fire chance than 1000lbs) and just have max 4600 damage per hit potential, have far less damage chance (penetration chance) than 1000lbs.

 

<content removed> really hate america and midway armor and aa is not same historical

 

What? Don't say it to the game developers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midway-class_aircraft_carrier AA same historical. Have great efficiency. But blueprint Hakuryu almost same.

What do you want? Modern refit Phalanx CIWS? Lmao :facepalm:

 

Belt, one side have same as displayed in wikipedia, but other side, wikipedia don't give this information.

See this (to the specification)

or go to the museum for yourself.

All ship, plating armor have decent balancing purpose (and not far different than the real specification) , (by tier, etc).

Deck, hmm just 87mm, I wonder where's the 2mm, but maybe it's for balancing.

Japanese 551lbs can't penetrate her deck armor.

 

If there's no balancing beside the historical thing, this game will have a lot problem, complaint, etc.

Almost all game do this. You'll know what's "unbalance" when you play this game from first opening.

 

Sorry of wrong grammar, my english really bad, CMIIW, and a lot of IMO, hope you understand.

Yeah, USN CV need some buff or balancing.

 

Quotes Updated.

~ADM_dude_SG

Edited by ADM_dude_SG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×