Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'wg'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • World of Warships - Asia Language Based Communities
    • English Speaking Community
    • 繁體中文討論區
    • 日本語コミュニティ
    • 한국어 커뮤니티
  • Mod Section
    • Player Modifications
  • Public Test Forums
    • English Speaking Community
    • 繁體中文討論區
    • 日本語コミュニティ
  • Locked Threads
    • Locked Threads

Calendars

There are no results to display.


Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Drag Interests

Found 10 results

  1. G’day Folks… OK this may be a bit ranty but I’ll try and keep it as fair as I can. A post I did up for clan mates a few days ago... WG has seriously lost the plot. Just so I’m not completely having a go at them, let us take a look at what they’ve done right over recent memory: USN BB buffs IJN CA buffs (Mogami still needs a range buff to 16km IMO and you could argue Furu/Myoko didn’t need them but global 203 buff was good) USN CL line (mostly, Worc is still a tad ‘OP’) IJN DD gunbotes 9/10 (still ‘OP’ – looking at you Flambass w/ Haru div, good to finish the line though) Arms race game mode (good when not in ranked) Brawler mode (circle reducing during Halloween, a lot of fun) Salem MN CA reload booster JB PEF campaign (reasonably difficult but not impossibru like others have been in the past), PEF not so much though. Ranked Sprints Izumo buffs (both first and second) Ibuki buffs (still really squishy though) What was the common factor in most of the above? Simplez, minor changes, not sledgehammer ones (game modes/campaigns exempted). Even things like the Salem and JB, Salem isn’t ‘OP’, and JB is good fun (most of the time – looking at you RNG) but again not ‘OP’. Both are very similar to tech-tree ships with some minor changes that made them feel unique and fun. (Although I have heard Salem called boring *shrugs* at least it isn’t broken). Now by doing things incrementally, even when WG hasn’t implemented changes that CC’s/players have asked for; they’ve still managed to release balanced changes that felt right. I feel like over xmas they’ve lost the plot. Let’s look at some major issues since xmas… From the recent ST changes; Azuma has heal buff, accuracy nerf and hydro again. Do you know why? Because she was too niche as a ‘sniper’. Do you want to know what the CC’s issues wit here were? Squishiness. You might be looking at this and saying ‘but heal buff’. Yeah nah… Her biggest issue is she has such poor armour and an IJN citadel. Outside fires and floods, other damage is healed at a percentage, citadels being the lowest. The one thing people liked about her was her accuracy and they’ve now taken that away as well. So WG you buffed the not-issue with her squishiness and nerfed her only compensation… Wow… Now I will add that this is still in testing so they could wake up, however I don’t hold high hopes. CV Rework and Haku things Now I am fairly forgiving when it comes to CV rework hotfixes, it’s a big change and will take time. The issue is they completely overnerfed Haku and IJN CVs have pretty much become ‘meh’. The one issue Haku had was TB spam, instead of just addressing F-key abuse and replenish rate, they nerfed the TBs as well. They are now basically useless and I am yet to see a Haku do well (outside enemy CV being useless). The other major CV issue was in and around DDs. Rockets were completely wrecking them and spotting of DDs was making things work. Here’s an idea, eliminate CV spotting of DDs as a temp measure (isn’t going to completely break the class like everything else they’ve done) and then increase dispersion of rockets a tad (baby steps folks). Nope, they overnerfed rockets… AA ratings So you introduce a CV rework, change AA and struggle to understand why the game is broken. The big issue here is that somewhere in the rework/hotfixes, AA became inconsistent across tiers, in tiers and particularly in ‘AA’ ships. Without addressing this inconsistency and the whole of AA first, how do they even hope to get CVs into a good place. At the moment CVs are annoying, inconsistent, frustrating, OP and UP at the same time. A large part of this is AA consistency and a large part of it is ad hock overnerfs/buffs. And yet we now have another CV line about to come into the mix… Stalingrad/Moskva OK not many people may know this but back around the IFHE introduction WG effectively said (I’m paraphrasing here) that 50mm of armour would not be a thing on CAs and it would not be common on BBs. The reason being that CA HE would need IFHE to pen 50mm of armour and 150s wouldn’t be able to –at all–. Stalingrad and Moskva both have it. And this has led the game down a dangerous path of armour/HE penetration creep. There is now a meta based around simply countering these ships. They are useful regardless (thankyou radar, range and gun calibour) but the 50mm of armour has seen Henri IVs with IFHE (even though it has biggest CA guns in the game) and Hindenburgs being a must-have in competitive line-ups. Here's a thought; nerf their armour down to the next bracket but give them more concealment, agility or even gun angles. To be honest the Moskva/Stalingrad issue is less major than others but it represents a willingness to power-creep armour which completely rewrites balance and starts cutting out large swathes of the CL/A and DD populations. IFHE is a skill that obviously needs addressing, particularly when it becomes a ‘must pick’ to do damage, however you can’t address it without addressing armour values either. Moskva and Stalingrad are a sign of worse things to come. Conclusion WG have done some seriously good buffs and changes over the last year or so. The biggest issue is that at some point they stopped making considered changes to issues and clearly have no idea about proper game development. They appear to have no concept of defining the end-state aside from a one-line clause. (Here’s a hint; you need to have a way of measuring changes and measuring success aside from ‘did it work’?) They seem more like a child, randomly pulling out jenga-blocks without any concept of basic structural integrity. If it holds up, yay! Nevermind the fact that they are most likely going to need to do it again in future. I really hope they can get this stuff right, even at some point, even just a little bit… Because I honestly enjoy this game and love the folks I play it with.
  2. MikuChrome

    Enough is enough

    Well done WoWS team, you just achieved exactly what WoT did to "Artillery rework". The whole game is now unenjoyable with this "CV Rework", haven't you learn anything like at all ? You have like the whole community as a reference to prevent this from happening but no you just not get it don't you, you just have to push this through because you spend your time and resources on it. SEA server potentially be the "worst" server, for what reason, why don't you try to find that out by simply visiting the place and see the meta as a reference to make the game better and more enjoyable ??? So many misturn starts with Belfast, British Battleships, British Destroyers and all other type of unbalanced/premium ships introduced but we all can accept this to certain level since it doesn't really effecting much players. Bugs that exists since beta still around the players can still accept it since again it doesn't effect much players, GUI is an annoyance of waiting and stuttering but we love the game so whatever. But this .......This is too much You have 4 classes of ships 3 of which are surface units having a role of a footsoldier. The last one have a role comparable to a "Commander" role in some FPS games, no doubt about it this is hard to balance it out since it plays completely different. Since you want that role to be somewhat accessible to all kind of players by toning it down to be somewhat closer to surface units gameplay..... Now look at your magic. All 3 surface units are now basically a punching bag for the game, AA ships can't even fend off for itself every single one of them either have to hide in fear or flocked up like a sheeps waiting to be picked off. I don't know what you're trying to achieve other than alienating those 3 classes of ships out because your magic did exactly that, Making the "Commander" role play like a Footsoldier. If the players get to choose between the two role with no limitation everyone will no doubt pick the one that will grant them more power than the other role. The change that changes nothing. You say this change will make the class less dominant, which make sense, considering you're tuning the role of a "commander" to be more of a footsoldier. Fixing the problem of fishermen altogether. Do you failed to realise when a group of players want to rip your game aparts they absolutely will !? You're suppose to reward these players for going through your work to an extreme and accept that not all the players are going to do that but no you just have to attempt to bring them down to the same level as other. For how long do you think these players will stay the same level as the other, think about it, these group of players loved your game so much they will rip the game apart to be up there at the top. Sooner or later they will be back achieving what they always do so what's the point of this so called "change" other than alienating more players and potentially enraging these hardcore fans ? Also if I have to be more direct on this subject this is exactly what the game is like 2 years ago before all the AA buff and CV Changes. You just need to learn to let go of these wasted resources/time otherwise its the players letting go.
  3. Commander_GALEN

    PH mobile payment for Doubloons

    Hey WG, what happened to the other payment provider? why you removed them. What the hell is this Centili? Doubloons is meh and payment is expensive! I prefer the last provider who sell doubloons via mobile payment, it's so cheap Last provider: 100 Php = 410 doubloons New provider which is Centili: 100 Php = 330 doubloons
  4. see this thread for reference : as you know, even WG itself stated in its video..... Pan Asia DD can basically cover the entire map with smoke for more than 5 min! min 3:07!!!! https://worldofwarships.asia/en/news/common/dev-diaries-PADD/ ..... well, its not really suspicious until you realize..... WG said they want "smoke and smoke gameplay too much smoke gameplay" is removed from the game! but, what did they have done? 1) Offer to Refund Buyfast and Mikael Kalashnikov! 2) promise never sell belfast again...... 3) BUFF entire RNCL to get as longer smoke as DD! 4) player who refund belfast is regret their decision 5) add Pan Asia DD with ultimate smoke of damocles 6) creating new meta " T6 2 Pan Asia DD + T7 radar ship " 7) of course, since T7 MM is special (get highest tier most of the time) this division will benefit A LOT! 8) and LELwater torpedo is guarantee to not hit Atlanta and Belfast if enemy have Pan Asia DD 9) the LELwater torpedo will punish a BB who try to destroy the radar ship now think, unlimited smoke plus radar..... i must admit Indianapolis is not flamethrower, but Belfast and Lolanta is superb Flamethrower. with inside the smoke, it can firing and firing.... delete anyone.... oh wait, there is smoke nerf! ok, still with radar, the gunboat pan asia DD can still rekt any ship especially a small torpedoboat.... anyway, a person behind this scheme is REALLY GENIUSES! _______________________________________________________________________________ well, here is the theory why WG doing this! A) WG want to sell more Indianapolis and Lolanta because this meta this is the most logical sense, since belfast removed from shell... Lolanta is crappy ship compared to Belfast. to increase the sell? introduce the pan asia DD with unlimited smoke works. no CV dare to get close, no BB dare to get close, enemy try to get close will get tribuchet of flame to their ship until sunk and regret after that rant to forum which is only feed the troll and finally forced everyone to get the meta by buying Lolanta and then we have a new meta and then there will be ranked at T7 that benefit pan asia DD and Lolanta. conclusion : more smoke, radar division with pan asia DD, new meta, >> Profit >> yeah! i am [content removed] genie! B) some ultra rich and powerfull person is order WG to do this! if you know this guy....... if you are noob but want to gitgud? MONEEEIIIISSS!!! yep, money will solve the problem.... imagine you are the only one who use belfast and NO ONE on enemy team use belfast..... and in your team there is 3 pan asia DD...... oh well, you will be easily win! without effort! the hired unicum pan asia DD will lay smoke and protect you..... and what will you do? just pop up radar.... sit and relax.... let the unicum pan asia DD do their job! but here is the problem! there is TOO MANY BELFaST! how to get rid it? give $$$$ to WG, WG will pretend to nerf the smoke meta and offer to refund! tadaa! less belfast! conclusion : life is easier when you have money C) WG want to sell Belfast in the black market so if Belfast is not sell anymore where you can get it? of course you cannt buy it in normal way..... WG have actually have its own black market called "Russian Bias". did you know the commander called "Russian Bias" in april mop even and commanding the submarine? IF YOU DECODE the message, it want to tell you "find us, RussianBias at Deep Web" and surprisingly there is really someone name called "RussianRedCat" selling some weapon in deepweb...... well, i am just peek there to find information about China next economic move. i am suspect he sell belfast in the deepweb. sell the redeem code! but there is a hole in this theory......since the silk road is closed, where is reliable black market when you can sell something anonimously? are there a new BTC black market? D) WG just want to punish player who refund belfast staff A : bro, there is 90% player refund belfast and mikhail kutuzov! staff B : dang it! we are just want to balance the game and they betray us by refund the OP ship? staff C : bro, i got an idea! lets get our revenge! create the new meta and show em, wooo is da boss! staff B : LEL, nice idea! staff A : how about Pan-Asia DD with unlimited smoke works..... the smoke is smoke at all tier? staff B : i dont get it what you say..... but LETS DO IT! _________________ WTF i have done Profanity. Post edited. User already warned. ~dead_man_walking
  5. are you even think about some weird stuff bad advice behave? if you watch think deeply, there is simply some mistery involved on bad advice! there are a few theory about the real self of bad advice captain. what is that? # A Rogue Mercenary well, as you can see... there is a lot of scene Bad Advice using paint on his face including this scene whut? also what nationality he has? he command Conqueror and Bismarck!!! what the?..... # The Misterous Fish this fish is really FISHY!.... well.... if this fish is really smart, why the heck it leave Bad Advice and command its own ship? # is bad advice captain really noob? well, this is the most intriguing after all. if you watch carefully, bad advice INTEND TO LOSING! even if you are very noob there is a moment when you can just do nothing and win the game. but look : he just need to do nothing to win the game! even a VERY VERY NOOB PLAYER WILL REALIZE THIS! but?? WHY?? and here another evidence : the bad advice IS INTEND TO SPARE THE ALMOST SUNK ENEMY SHIP! if you are noob and greedy, you will want to kill as many ship as possible! (just look at Bad Advice character for lust of killing in "never cap never surender") and there is more mistery if you watch and think it carefully! Obviously HE IS NOT NOOB! HE DID EVERYTHING ON PURPOSE! # a former unicum WoT player? look! this is common tactic in WoT, and HE WANT TO TELL THAT WoT TACTIC WONT WORK! at least we know he used to be WoT player. and the photo in the last minute tell us that he is soldier! (i suspect he is mercenary) # if He is not noob, WHY HE DID THIS? ah nice question, finally we got the conclusion! HE WANT MONEY! WG simply pay him for every Video he made about warship! here is the proof! there is subliminal message "W" with 2 arrow symbol when he command the Plane to attack enemy CV ! if you play CV, ITS IMPOSSIBLE to create CURVE WAYPOINT! well.... he want to tell us he just did this on purpose because WG pay him! Conclusion : Bad Advice is actually unicum in disguise, until now... no one know about his true identity..... _____________ this is my last thread as Skarhabek, since WG ban my account because saying i am using "aim assist" mod. later my friend told me it wasnt aim assist mod.... it was "navigator" mod..... hell sheet, he should tell me earlier about the mod name..... LOL i called it aim assist and got banned because using it. of course.... i still play warship with my new account.
  6. lel, just problem.... not a serious problem though.... 1. misleading AA rating Iowa vs Missoury AA is only 3 different rating (in the same match) BUT, the difference is like earth and sky. i successfully launch 6of8 torpedo with 2 Iowa sticking together. AGAINTS SINGGLE MISSOURY (GG), only 3of8 what? the problem is : a) how do we now if enemy have Manual AA control? ITS AA RATING SHOULD BE DOUBLED! obviously i wont attack this kind of ship first. b) AFT+20% AA range+flag, how de hall did you know enemy have this? obviously if ship have insane AA, CV captain should be carefull 2. CV require more better CPU? & SERIOUS LAG ON CV weird why playing board game require more PC spec than playing battlship. i can run on HIGH setting and playing without problem. in CV playing with LOW setting and still have LATE loading. this is heavy disadvantage for CV captain because the first 3 min is determine the fate of the battle. also some kind of lag, making my strafe missed. THE PLANE STOPPED for 1 sec before strafing :V 3. NEED instant MAP click CURSOR + more Zoom out mod just annoying to have scrrooooll over to see other map, and also Zoom out mod. the game should have it from the start.... but any mod? 4. invisfiring AA? its just lag or whatever, ship shooting AA should be detected. that is why there is turn off AA button to keep remain undetected. like invisfiring, this one should be removed too! 5. plane detectability its still a mistery to me, also if friendly DD got spotted by enemy plane, DD should report that its getting spotted. it will warn CV to drift out those pesky spotter plane. knowing the detectability of a plane will help CV to create surprise attack :V so we know where to hide and change direction. 6. do plane got healed after return to carrier? or they have the same remaining HP mistery..... 9. I NEED red reticle CV mod, is there any ? i cannt see DD when use DB autol attack.... its green color is well blended with the color of the sea i am not color blind, but the low setting for CV make it harder to difference of the color 10. is that concealment expert usefull for IJN CV? do you think this build is viable for IJN CV? http://shipcomrade.com/captcalc/0001000000010000001100000001100019 11. who is more terrifying for surface ship? Midway or Hakuryu? is that Hakuryu plane significantly stronger compared to Shokaku? if only 3of8 shokaku plane survived againts Missory, how high is survival chance of 12 Hakuryu TB againts Misoury? to be honest i have a grudge againts missouryu. 12. Hakuryu, is that YOLO-able? 5 KM secondary, with AFT become 6 KM. in Ryujo i dont have a problem knife fighting DD, but Hiryu and Shokaku armor are seriously weak......
  7. Yesterday I went straight down from rank 10 to rank 12 Today I got myself carried to rank 10 again, 4 straight wins And the problem is, I did not do absolutely anything in the matches today, Like bruh, i got a WR of 49%, what do u expect from me?
  8. Anime collaboration, premium ships and what not. The ONLY reason WG decides to do these kind of stuff is because of PROFIT. You guys read me? PROFIT. Google it if you do not know what it means. For WG, anime collaboration>attracts anime fans playing this game>IAP>profit premium ship with historical meaning(such as new 'stralia prem cruiser)>attracts aussies playing this game>IAP>profit WG is not a NGO organisation, they don't really care about if a small groups of people do not like it. As long as it does not interfere from them earning money, they will do anything. And let's face it, the sheer amount of people playing WoWs in Australia just can not be compared with the player base in SE asia, Taiwan and Japan (where the majority of the potential anime fans lies in Asia). Remember last year's WG gathering? For those who have came to the Adelaide gathering, we all know how few of us came as compared to the other gatherings. With anime collaboration, WG can use the least resource (by adding anime voice and a simple skin), to get a lot of profit. They have to put equal amount of effort into making an aussie premium ship (or an ANZAC collaboration/event if WG ever do it), but they will not be able to get a lot of profit in return. The reason is really simple, I wonder why can't some people just get over with it. And again, let's consider this: If there is a pile of shit lying on the road, you just go around and ignore it. Simple really huh? Why would you step on it and then complain about it?
  9. Recently, we have joined a competition which held by a facebook group. We took part in it, and seek for some excitement and enjoyment. At the time of registration, we see a single elimination with the finals using BO3, so there is no more consideration about the system of the competition. As a result, the organizers did not put the whole competition system details on our hands, but successive days before the match, they posted the updated information about the competition follow-up process onto their discussion area without notifying any team. Even when top 6 teams started the match, they still had not explained the method to pick out the finalist. This is very difficult to understand. Moreover, they announced after the round of 6, there will be a repechage during the round of 6 elimination while there is NO repechage in the following rounds, also the previous round of elimination. So the whole figure is like 4 teams playing an addition round of elimination 24 teams eliminates to 3 teams throughout 3 rounds A repechage to make the 4th team out Round of 4 using single elimination to determine the finalist and the 3rd place match teams. Where the teams won round of 6 but they still need to compete with one of the losing team without having any advantage. By this unfairness, we had tried to appeal, negotiate. However, the highest organizer announced the follow up match, same as the process mentioned above the paragragh, which mean our opinions were ignored by the organizer. There is no any reply from the manager and they still take this as a minor problem (or maybe ignore the opinion from 3 winning teams in the final? ) , as they never apologize publicly as an organization. After that, due to the organizer's action, 3 leaders of the winning teams @ round of 6 decided to give up and forfeit in this competition. Although abstentions were made, the organizer announced "Ban 3 teams to join any of our events forever, due to abstentions reason are not proper." There is the announcement from the organizer Description of activities and punishment announcement: 1. Team "Siki", "1st Fleet of The Sun Flag" and "Silver Meteor" will be the Champion, first runner-up and second runner-up respectively, because Team "Goo Goo Goo" , "Rescue Penguin" and "WoWsPMC" abandoned the match. 2. For the teams which complain about the competition system and caused difficulties on the process, affect the rights and interests of other teams and the organization, these are the punishment after our discussion: Team "Goo Goo Goo" and "Rescue Penguin", all of their team members are not allowed to join any of the events that designed by our organization forever. Team "WoWsPMC" had told us that they can’t make a free time to fit in the date of the final match , so we decided to deprive their rights to join our events for 2 times. 3. Every teams have their rights to refuse opponent's postpone, we will adjudge opponent team as a loss. You can also report to the organization of you have some problems, if not, the date of the match will be change as 2 leaders agree. For the repechage part, we announced that on 6/28 pm22:11 (like the picture showed) and announcement on 7/21 (which is not pinned to top) , there are also some matches going on and we didn’t receive any report about the change of the mechanism. To be clear, if you have any problems, don’t try to do some actions which affect the rights and interests of other teams and the organization. If you want more details , search the relevant cases:Taiwan taekwondo abandon tournament and Taiwan eSports team race abandoned for no reason. 4. Thanks for the contestants to participate our event, also everyone's support and advice. Since this event was first held, a lot of negligence were made due to the inexperienced organization, we have to apologize here for bring inconvenience to everyone. We will review and keep improve, for the better activities to everyone in this FaceBook Group, allow me to thank you guy's tolerate and encourage, we will do better because of your support. Due to Tony's (Manager)personal mistake , 3 final winning team's interests and reputation being exploited , we protested and express our opinions before , how could the organizer described as " abstentions reason are not proper " ? "For the repechage part , we announced that on 6/28 pm22:11 ( like the picture showed ) and announcement on 7/21 ( which is not pinned top) , there are also some matches going on and we didn’t receive any report about the change of the mechanism." There was a match on 7/20 and 7/22, while 7/21 has no match. We asked about the repechage on 7/22 at night, but Tony made some delay, work on it until 7/23 , and he just ignored that in the end. (Tony's private group which invited 3 final teams ) Mainly the chat only consist of the better version which we considered as better while tony shee(manager of the competition) making apologize for NOT explaining the whole competition system to us + not considering our suggestion, which is on 7/23. "To be clear, if you have any problems, don’t try to do some actions which affect the rights and interests of other teams and the organization. If you want more details , search the relevant cases:Taiwan taekwondo abandon tournament and Taiwan eSports team race abandoned for no reason." Put international competition compare to this abstention issue, but the organizer didn’t follow the rules of repechage from international competition. Repechage team could be fight for the final is the main point. Reiterate again, abstention is our right, no need to be tangle. Overall, the organization didn’t fulfill their obligation, eventually be ignored and harm to our rights and interests, even we tried our best to cooperate with. Right here, I hope the organizer could apologize and give us a fair, justice action. And I hope WG will have some event guideline for the people who want to organize the event, in order to help them. Lastly, congratulate to the teams from the repechage to get the Champion, first runner-up and second runner-up respectively. I am afarid posting picture with traditional chinese violate the forum rules, please pm me if u want those pictures.
  10. Before we start, I would like to remind WG that the game we are playing, "world of warships", has a beta version called PT. With that been said, why couldn't WG simply dump the staff that they want to change in it!? None of the trillions of bugs that currently takes place in the game happened In the PT, and a lot of things was tested in the PT didn't even show up in the real game. The later is easier to understand as some changes might not be positive, but it really doesn't make sense as WG simply give players tons of bugs with a in-ur-face style that wasn't in the PT, that made the entire 051 like a car crash. Look at all these weird things that is going on in the game, no smoke on top of ships, the notaries and fixed no-citadel for battleships, the strange 100% addition on planes with lower speed and the inconsistent torpedo lines. NONE OF THESE BREAKING BADS WERE SUPPOSE TO HAPPEN!!! WG should have tested the changes that it updated to these attributes in the PT long ago If WG doesn't plan to test the things that it want to change in game with a testing environment, why having a testing version of the game in the first place? BTW, why is wargaming spending so much time on simple bug fixes? It took them an entire week just to fix citadel hits for battleships, while other important glitches are still left hanging Excuse for my language but I couldn't think of a better way to describe this: WG is dumping bugs on us like it is having trouble with diarrhea, while its speed in fixing bugs is as if that it suffers from constipation
×