Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'premium'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • World of Warships - Asia Language Based Communities
    • English Speaking Community
    • 繁體中文討論區
    • 日本語コミュニティ
    • 한국어 커뮤니티
  • Mod Section
    • Player Modifications
  • Public Test Forums
    • English Speaking Community
    • 繁體中文討論區
    • 日本語コミュニティ
  • Locked Threads
    • Locked Threads

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Drag Interests

Found 63 results

  1. Hi Wargameing Dev team, While playing the UK destroyer line it got me thinking, the Commonwealth of Nations fought along side with the British during WW2 in both Atlantic and Pacific theater. And after looking around the internet, I found that it is possible to create a Commonwealth of Nations destroyer line like the Pan-Asia destroyer line. Commonwealth of Nations playstyle/gimmik is the "Creeping Smoke Generator" and the "Individual Torpedo Launch" (Haida and Perth), where as Pan-Asia is "Deep Water Torpedo". The playstyle almost mirrors British DD, smoke, harrass, torp, flee. Almost. But if wargameing has other ideas to make the playstyle unique, I welcome it. Here is what I have come up with when looking around the internet: CA/CL T1 Swan (AU) -> (Grimsby Class) Note: Its T1 DD Line T2 Champlain (CA) -> HMS Torbay (S Class, T Class) Close to HMS Medea T3 Vancouver (CA) -> HMS Vimy (V Class, W Class) Mirrors HMS Valkyrie T4 Waterhen (AU) -> HMS Waterhen (V Class, W Class) Mirrors HMS Wakeful T5 Saguenay (CA) -> (A Class, B Class) Mirrors HMS Acasta T6 Ottowa (CA) -> HMS Griffin (G Class, H Class) Mirrors HMS Galant T7 Quadrant (CA) or Rajput (IN) -> (Q Class, R Class) Note: Unique T7 T8 Jan van Riebeeck (ZA) -> (W Class, Z Class) Note: Unique T8 T9 Anzac (AU) or Badr (PK) -> ("Battle" Class) Mirrors HMS Jutland T10 Voyager (AU) -> (Daring Class) Mirrors HMS Daring Note: HMAS Vampire already used in T3. Note: Like the Voyager satellite, maybe they can do a unique Camo after space battles. 🙂 Branch Tech Tree (One set torpedo launcher but early access to dual mount guns in T7 branch) Edited and added on Dec. 18, 2019 T6 Fraser (CA) -> (C Class) Close to HMS Galant Note: Originally has two set of torpedo tubes. One set was removed for additional 102 mm AA gun. T7 Athabaskan (CA) or Arunta (AU) -> ("Tribal" Class) Mirrors HMS Haida Note: 6 - 120 mm guns and one set of quadruple torpedo tubes. OR T7 Napier (AU) -> (J, K, and N Class) Mirrors HMS Jervis Note: Original N class has only one set of quintule torpedo tubes. T8 Crusader (CA) or Jahangir (PK) -> (Cr Class) Note: Unique T8 T9 Tobruk (AU) or Khaibar (PK) -> ("Battle" Class) Mirrors HMS Jutland Note: Originally built with two sets of torpedo tubes. One will be removed to follow trend. T10 Vendetta (AU) -> (Daring Class) Mirrors HMS Daring Note: Built with only one set of quintuple torpedo tube. T9 Anzac and T10 Voyager guns are too small to do some real damage. In my British Tech Tree Suggestion, I requested for T9 Jutland and T10 Daring be having the option to equip 133 mm (5.25 in guns), or split them as another class with 133 mm (5.25 in) guns installed as default. I would like to see T9 Anzac and T10 Voyager have the same treatment. Either have a 133 mm (5.25 in) guns be optional equipment or have a separate ship with 133 mm (5.25 in) guns as default. Possible premium ships. T6 Leander (NZ) -> HMS Leander (Leander Class) - CL Mirrors HMS Leander T6 Ontario or Quebec (CA) -> HMS Valiant (Queen Elizabeth Class) - BB Mirrors HMS Warspite Note: She was never built, but when Canada plans to build her, she would look line Queen Elizabeth in her 2nd refit in 1926 (with 1 smoke stack but retains the original bridge and secondary armaments of 6 in guns) Note: Although unconfirmed, Australia also plans to procure some Queen Elizabeth class battleships of their own. She would look line Queen Elizabeth in her 2nd refit in 1926 (with 1 smoke stack but retains the original bridge and secondary armaments of 6 in guns) Personal opinion: Due to the success of both Queen Elizabeth Class and Bayern Class, Pan America (Brazil, Argentina, Chile and possibly Peru) and Pan Europe (Spain and Netherlands) planned to procure their own battleships based on both British and German designs. It would be a common sight to see these ships in T6 plays with their own twists and gimmicks. Foot Note: CA = Canada AU = Australia NZ = New Zealand ZA = South Africa IN = India* PK = Pakistan* * = May possibly serve as Pan-Asian ships I hope that you like this suggestion and let me know if I have missed other DD that might mirror them in their respective tiers.
  2. Hello Everyone Again, while reading on wikipedia about Hipper, i found out that there's a successor to the famed Admiral-class battlecruiser from the 1920s, designated 'J3' class. She was designed to fix many of Hood's problems, and match the US' Lexington-class battlecruiser. Supposedly, it has a marginally improved protection scheme (i believe more resistance to plunging fire) while mounting three triple 15 in/381 mm Mk. I guns, targeted to achieve 32 knots. Further works resulted in G3 and eventually Nelson-class. From afar, it looks like a larger Renown with triple turrets. Interested, i decided to tinker some aspect of the design (courtesy to shipbucket.com for the design!), and here it is: Instead of the triple 15 inchers, i have it replaced by a twin 18 in/457 mm Mk. II gun, and gave it Renown-style superstructure. Essentially, it's a tea-powered Georgia minus the modern thingy. Some specifications i can found: Main Battery : 3x3 15 in/381 mm (original), 3x2 18 in/457 mm (proposed) Secondary Battery : 6x2 and 6x1 6 in/152 mm gun (original design), could be supplemented by QF 4 in like Hood was IRL or replaced by either 5.25 in/133 mm or 4.5 in/114 mm dual purpose guns. Anti-Aircraft Battery : Not found, possibly Vickers 40 mm Pom-Poms Protection : 305 mm angled main belt, 51 to 102 mm deck Speed : 32 knots Keep in mind these are her original 1920s spec, any hypothetical refits like the one done on Renown or (supposedly) Hood will significantly enhance her performance. If i were correct, Hood is planned to mount sixteen to twenty 5.25 in/133 mm DP gun found on KGV, and her armor belt reinforced to withstand more punishment. This could be also done to J3 as well considering their similarities. This is a hypothetical retrofit of the design, with aforementioned DP gun and changes like flare bow and catapult. I named her HMS Duke of Edinburgh, and thought she will fit in T9 as a teabag Georgia or mini-Thunderer. Well...any opinions?
  3. Earl_of_Arland

    Yugoslav Destroyer Split

    Hello Everyone Today, while reading on wikipedia about Hipper, i came across this thing: Yugoslav Destroyer Split And she has interesting story to begin with. Original Design She was conceived in early 1930s from the rising need to counter any Italian destroyer in case of conflict. The Yugoslav decided to built a single large destroyer type as opposed to another Beograds, and contracted a French company to design the new ship. For start, she was based on the famed Le Fantasque-class in MN service, focusing on speed and firepower. However, she was going to be powered by British-designed propulsion (which drives her up to 37 knots), Advanced fire controls from France and guns from Sweden and Czechoslovakia. Split was intended to mount five Skoda 140 mm (5.5in)/56 guns (massive for a destroyer, though some said it was going to be replaced by 127 mm variant instead) and 5 of the famed Bofors 40 mm as AA, powerful for that time. She also packs two, triple 533 mm torpedo tubes for good measure. This 2,400t beast could be called the most powerful destroyer at that time. She was then laid down in July 1939. Italian Service Sadly, WWII put a halt on her construction, and soon the Italians captured her half-complete on her namesake city. The Regia Marina decided to continue her construction, replacing the machinery with Italian-built one, and the main armament changed to 135 mm (5.3in)/45 guns with her AA replaced by Breda. Split was put on high priority as the Italians lacked destroyers, and she was launched in 1943 with this configuration, though work was halted again after the Italian surrendered. She was briefly used by the Germans and stripped of any valuable material before being scuttled. Post-War Yugoslav Service With their navy lacking any sizable warships, the Yugoslav government decided to 'resurrect' Split and began ordering parts to properly rebuilt her. However, with Tito-Stalin Split (totally not a pun), they were unable to get her original armament. Due to this, Yugoslavia approached US and UK, and they give them surplus 127 mm (5in)/38, 40 mm Bofors and advanced electronics with her Italian propulsion replaced by British one. With minor modifications to her hull and removal of one of her torpedo tubes, Split was finally commissioned into Yugoslav Navy in 1953 as flagship. So, considering her very 'unique' life, it is almost evil not to include her in World of Warships. Not only that, she has three different configurations to potentially play with. European Harekaze? Now we're talking! Annoying destroyer with hard-hitting guns that reload slowly, fast speed, and ok-ish AA. More balanced destroyer with hard-hitting guns that reload a little quicker and faster speed in exchange for bad AA. Dakka-Dakka destroyer with good AA and hydro? So, What do you guys think? does she fits in the game as a potential premium ship?
  4. HMS Renown (1944) The only battlecruiser of the Royal Navy to remain afloat by the end of the war, Renown was somewhat unique. Her relatively weak armor and despite her size carried only six 381 mm main armament may seem underwhelming compared to other capital ship, she was very fast at 31 knots and carries decent anti-aircraft armament of 72 Oerlikon 20 mm guns. I potentially see Renown as a long-range sharpshooter with accurate but fast firing guns to compensate the low number or support ship with her blazing AA and speed to keep up with the cruisers. But her low-sitting thin belt discourage mid-range brawling like how Hood is played currently. Feel free to discuss :D
  5. Hi Wargameing Dev team, I would like to suggest a complete Pan-America destroyer line. However I came in 2 problems: 1. I cant find a suitable T1 for the Pan- America gunboat for the tech tree and need help on this. 2. Pan-America needs a unique gimmick or play style (Pan-Asia Deep-Water torpedo, British ambush and flee destroyer, German tanky destroyers, Russian suicide tactic, Commonwealth creep smoke). May it be armament, consumable, or their stats. However I was able to complete a destroyer line for Pan-America. I hope you like them. Here is what I have come up with when looking around the internet: Main Line DD T2 Alexandrino de Alenca / Maranhão (BR) Originally Porpoise "K-Class 1913" (UK) Armament: 3 × QF 4 in (102 mm) Mark IV guns (3 x 1) 1 × QF 2 pdr (40 mm) pom-pom Mk. II (1 x 1) 2 × 21 in (533 mm) torpedoes (2 x 1) T3 Almirante Villiar (PE) Originally Miklucho Maklai "Orfey Vlass" (RU) Armament: 4 × 4.0 in (102 mm)/60 Pattern 1911 guns (4 x 1) 1 × QF 2 pdr (40 mm) pom-pom Mk. II (1 x 1) 2 × 0.30 in (7.62 mm) Maxim machine guns (2 x 1) 9 × 18 in (450 mm) torpedo tubes (3 x 3) Note: Miklucho Maklai (RU) -> Vambola (EE) -> Almirante Villiar (PE) See "Pan-Europe Destroyer Tech Tree Suggestion" T4 Almirante Guise (PE) Originally Avtroil "Izyaslav Class" (RU) Armament: 5 × 4.0 in (102 mm)/60 Pattern 1911 guns (5 x 1) 1 x 2.5 in (63.3 mm) Model 1916 (1 x 1) / 4 x 1.8 in (45 mm) 21-K (4 x 1) 2 × 0.30 in (7.62 mm) Maxim machine guns (2 x 1) 9 × 18 in (450 mm) torpedo tubes (3 x 3) Note: Avtroil (RU) -> Lennuk (EE) -> Almirante Guise (PE) See "Pan-Europe Destroyer Tech Tree Suggestion" T5 Mendoza (AR) Based on "Scott Class" (UK) Armament: 5 × 4.7 in (120 mm) QF Mark IX guns (5 x 1) 1 × 3 in (76 mm) AA gun 2 × QF 2 pdr (40 mm) pom-pom Mk. II (2 x 1) ? Need more info 6 × 21 in (533 mm) torpedo tubes (2 x 3) or Juan de Garay (AR) Originally Alcala Galiano "Churruca Class" (ES) Armament: 5 × 4.7 in (120 mm)/45 guns (5 x 1) 1 × 3 in (76 mm) AA guns (1 x 1) 6 × 21 in (533 mm) torpedo tubes (2 x 3) or Antioquia (CO) Originally Douro "Douro Class" (PT) Armament: 4 - 4.7 in (120 mm)/45 guns (4 x 1) 2 - 2 pdr (40 mm) AA guns (2 x 1) 8 - 21 in (533 mm) torpedo tubes (2 x 4) T6 Buenos Aires (AR) Based on G-Class or Gallant (UK) Armament: 4 × 4.7 in (120 mm) QF Mark IX guns (4 × 1) 8 × 0.50 in (12.7 mm) Vickers machine guns (2 x 4) 8 × 21 in (533 mm) torpedo tubes (2 × 4) T7 Amazonas (BR) Based on H-Class (UK) but armed with US 5 in (127 mm) / 38 guns Armament: 4 x 5 in (127 mm)/38 guns (4 x 1) 2 × 1.6 in (40 mm) Bofors guns (1 x 2) ? Need more info 4 × 0.79 in (20 mm) Oerlikon guns (4 x 1) 8 × 21 in (533 mm) torpedo tubes (2 × 4) T8 Mariz e Barros (BR) Based on Mahan Class (US) but only has 2 torpedo tube insted of 3 Note: I did not use Marcilio Diaz because she may be used as a T10 ship with the same name. Armament: 5 × 5 in (127 mm)/38 guns (5 x 1) 4 × 1.6 in (40 mm) Bofors guns (2 x 2) 4 × 0.79 in (20 mm) Oerlikon guns (4 x 1) 8 × 21 in (533 mm) torpedo tubes (2 × 4) US Ships sold to Pan America T9 Blanco Encalada (CL) Originally USS Wadleigh "Fletcher Class" (US) or Cuitláhuac (MX) Originally USS John Rogers "Fletcher Class" (US) Armament: 5 × 5 inch (127 mm)/38 guns (5 x 1) 10 × 1.6 in (40 mm) Bofors guns (5 x 2) 7–12 × 0.79 in (20 mm) Oerlikon guns (7 x 1 or 6 x 2) 10 × 21 in (533 mm) torpedo tubes (2 × 5) T10 Ministro Portales (CL) Originally USS Charles S. Sperry "Allan M Summer Class" (US) Armament: 6 × 5 in (130 mm)/38 guns (3 x 2) [4 sec reload] 12 × 1.6 in (40 mm) Bofors guns (2 x 4 and 2 x 2) 10 × 0.79 in (20 mm) Oerlikon guns (10 x 1) 10 × 21 in (533 mm) torpedo tubes (2 x 5) or Quetzalcoatl (MX) Originally USS Vogelgesang "Gearing Class" (US) Armament: 6 × 5 in (130 mm)/38 guns (3 x 2) [3 sec reload] 12 × 1.6 in (40 mm) Bofors guns (2 x 4 and 2 x 2) 10 × × 0.79 in (20 mm) Oerlikon guns (10 x 1) 10 × 21 in (533 mm) torpedo tubes (2 x 5) European Ships sold to Pan America T9 Garcia y Garcia (PE) Originally HNLMS Holland "Holland Class" (NL) Armament: 4 x 4.7 in (120 mm) Bofors guns (2×2) 1 x 1.6 in (40 mm) Bofors AA gun (1 x 1) More can be added "Anti Submarine Mortars" Note: No Torpedo T10 Gálvez (PE) Originally HNLMS Groningen "Friesland Class" (NL) Armament: 4 x 4.7 in (120 mm) Bofors guns (2 × 2) 6 x 1.6 in (40 mm) Bofors AA guns (6 × 1) "Anti Submarine Mortars" Note: No Torpedo and T10 Siete de Agosto / Veinte de Julio (CO) Modified "Halland Class" (SE) Built for Colombian Navy Armament: 6 × 4.7 in (120 mm) Bofors guns (3 × 2) 4 × 1.6 in (40 mm) Bofors AA guns (4 × 1) 4 × 21.0 in (533 mm) torpedo tubes (1 × 4) "Anti-Submarine Mortars" All Armaments are only stock, WG can edit or custom them. Foot Note: (BR) = Brazil (CO) = Colombia (US) = USA (EE) = Estonia (AR) = Argentina (VE) = Venezuela (UK) = UK (ES) = Spain / Espania (CL) = Chile (EC) = Ecuador (RU) = Russia (SE) = Sweden (PE) = Peru (NL) = Netherlands (MX) = Mexico I hope that you like this suggestion. 🙂
  6. I know a lot of you does not like the new CV at all, I have to admit that the new CV is quite different from the old one. Before the CV rework, my PR of CV is Bad, but after the rework, I feel like it is quite workable for me, and my rating is now sways between Great and Unicum. So I decided to have some premium CVs under my collection, but I don't know which to get. My friend bought 20 containers and he got all premium CVs out of the containers except Kaga, sounds like a worthy purchase. So I also took a leap of faith and bought 20 Premium Naval Aviation Containers for myself, and here is what I got: Of course containers is completely based on RNG, but just in case players like you might consider buying the bundle, this is for your reference. Before the patch 0.8.0, I usually chose to bulk open containers so that I can reduce the interval between I open the crates, and hence reduce the randomness of the RNG based on time. Now that the "Open all containers" option is available, I would certainly recommend using that to get the most out of the open-crate-interval reduction. Good luck captains!
  7. Hi, I've been playing since 2015. I love this game. However, I feel that there are a few ships many have and many don't, that need to be made available to those (for whatever reason) who missed out on them. I can think of the Missouri and the Belfast a examples, but there are plenty more. Even if they were brought back to the premium shop for a day (announced with plenty of warning) or a week, it would give many players the opportunity to get ships which have been available in the past but are unobtainable now. This is not just for game play but for historical value as well, I mean who wouldn't want the Mighty MO??? Even if they were brought back for an anniversary like the day WW2 ended etc. Also imagine the boost to funding of WOW that would occur if they were to go on sale for a specific length of time 😁 Anyhow, this is just a thought, hope the developers might consider it. All the best, Wolven
  8. Hi Wargameing Dev team, Blyskawica is kinda lonely being the only Polish destroyer in the tech tree. Could you also add her sister and her predecessor: T6 ORP Wicher Armament (1939): 4 × 5.1 in (130 mm) guns (4 x 1) 2 × 2 pdr (40 mm) wz. 28 AA guns (2 x 1) 4 × 0.52 in (13.2 mm) wz. 30 HMGs (2 x 2) 6 × 550 mm/533 mm/450 mm torpedo tubes (3 x 2) ORP Burza Armament 1939: 4 × 5.1 in (130 mm) guns (4 x 1) 2 × 2 pdr (40 mm) wz. 28 AA guns (2 x 1) 4 × 0.52 in (13.2 mm) wz. 30 HMGs (2 x 2) 6 × 550 mm/533 mm torpedo tubes (3 x 2) Armament 1955: 4 x 100 mm guns (4 x 1) [definitely will require inertia fuse HE or maintain penetration of 20mm to be flexible] 8 × 1.5 in (37 mm) guns (4 x 2) 6 × 550 mm/533 mm torpedo tubes (3 x 2) T7 ORP Grom Armament 1936: 7 × 4.7 in (120 mm) Bofors wz. 34/36 guns 4 × 1.6 in (40 mm) AA Bofors guns (2 x 2) 8 × 0.52 in (13.2 mm) AA Hotchkiss HMG (4 x 2) 6 × 550 mm/533 mm torpedo tubes (2 x 3) ORP Blyskawica Armament 1937: 7 × 4.7 in (120 mm) Bofors wz. 34/36 guns (3 x 2 and 1 x 1) 4 × 1.6 in (40 mm) AA Bofors guns (2 x 2) 8 × 0.52 in (13.2 mm) AA Hotchkiss HMG (4 x 2) 6 × 550 mm/533 mm torpedo tubes (2 x 3) Armament 1941: 8 × QF 4-inch (102 mm) Mk XVI dual-purpose guns (4 x 2) [definitely will require inertia fuse HE or maintain penetration of 20 mm to be flexible] 4 × 1.6 in (40 mm) AA Bofors guns (2 x 2) 8 × 0.79 in (20 mm) AA Oerlikon guns (4 x 2) 6 × 550 mm/533 mm torpedo tubes (2 x 3) ORP Wicher and ORP Grom was sunk during the war, and ORP Burza and ORP Blyskawica survived the war. What if, ORP Wicher and ORP Grom can switch torpedo armament, while ORP Burza and ORP Blyskawica can switch artillery armament. Torpedo Armament for Wicher and Grom: 550 mm = 7 to 8 km, 18400 dmg 533 mm = 8 to 9 km, 14400 dmg Artillery Armament for Burza: 130 mm = 6.5 sec reload 1900 HE dmg and 2500 AP dmg 100 mm = 4.5 sec reload 1600 HE dmg and 2100 AP dmg Artillery Armament for Blyskawica: 120 mm = 6.5 sec reload 1700 HE dmg and 2200 AP dmg 102 mm = 4.5 sec reload 1500 HE dmg and 2000 AP dmg This will make them flexible and be comfortable to players who wish to brawl or ninja their enemies. I hope you will take these into consideration. 🙂
  9. Afujintaro

    A "Bonus" Question

    I know that a Premium ship gives an XP bonus (& a credit bonus). I know that a Premium account (i.e. Premium time) gives an XP bonus (& a credit bonus). My question is: What happens if I play a Premium ship while on Premium time? Do I get both sets of bonuses or is it still only really just one "Premium" bonus? I can't test it as I don't have any Premium time now. Pretty straight-forward question I hope. Thanks so much. 😀 Afujintaro
  10. Hi Waregameing Dev Team, Would like to suggest to add Swedish Cruiser Gotland (with 6 guns, 4 turrets) at T5 or T6 and Tre Kronor and/or Gota Lejon at T6 or T7. Like Polish Destroyer Blyskawica, they may be premeiums and may or may not have unique playstyle. And fly the Swedish flag. Side Note: Gota Lejon was sold to Chile as Almirante Latorre, possible for future Pan-American cruiser premium. I noticed that these cruisers may resemble German T5 Konigsberg or T6 Nurnberg style. Maybe the game play may not be far from that but should be different enough to be unique.
  11. Hi Waregameing Dev Team, Would like to suggest to add Estonian Destroyer Vambola at T3. And Lennuk at T4, Vambola is Kapitan Miklucha Maklai (Orfey Class Destroyer - Russia) Lennuk is Avtroil (Izyaslav Class Destroyer - Russia) Both ships are from Russia, both ships were captured by the British in 1918, given to the Estonian Navy. Like Polish Destroyer Blyskawica, they may be premeiums and may or may not have unique playstyle. And fly the Estonian flag. Note: Both ships were sild to Peru in 1933: Vambola as Almirante Villar Lennuk as Almirante Guise These 2 may be possible to create a Pan-America Destroyer line. Although my research is still incomplete, but it is possible to create a Pan-American Destroyer line. Just need a Playstyle/Gimmik
  12. Hi Waregameing Dev Team, Would like to suggest to add Romanian Destroyers Marasti and/or Marasesti at T6. And Regele Ferdinand and/or Regina Maria at T7 Like Polish Destroyer Blyskawica, they may be premeiums and may or may not have unique playstyle. And fly the Romanian flag.
  13. I love the game,and I wish to buy some premium ships. But, I think there should be a option to test drive a prem ship,before you buy it. Like example,I like the Ashitaka,but don't know if it is worth spending money for,if I have not ever played it. All i am suggesting to you guys, create a option,so that one player can play a prem ship,for one day,only once from his account. That way player will understand if the play style of the ship suits his or her play style. I am saying this because,I wanted to buy Atlanta,but scared that the ship might be too fragile for me to handle,so i tried my friends account to play the ship once,and i loved it instantly. Bought it the very next day. I hope this is not a impossible thing to consider. Thanks
  14. Why does WG not rotate the ships for sale in the Premium Shop? Every week it seems its the same ships as the week before with just some in packages, to seemingly double or triple the price, but no rotation through the stock of other Premium ships. I keep hoping to see 'HMS/HMAS Vampire' (that became part of the famous WW2 'Scrap Iron Flotilla') up for sale. The British Destroyer line role out would seem like a good time to put it up for sale as it was a former RN V-Class Destroyer almost the same as the W-Class 'HMS Wakeful', just added to the game. I also keep looking for the Russian Battleship 'Imperator Nikolai I'. This week's Halloween operation uses a reskinned version the 'Imperator Nikolai I' as 'Rasputin', the final enemy boss ship. Again this seem like the perfect week to sell that ship and its special Halloween skin but no... why??? I know I haven't been on WoWS very long, as I only recently left my countries' Navy, and so missed lots of great ships like the 'Arpeggio of Blue Steel' (ARP) ships (which WG probably never make available again) for example. Even my joining WoWS was problematic in that I joined on a referral but never got the free 'USS Texas' and 'Diana' I was meant to get, to which customer service did absolutely nothing to fix when I raised a ticket about it. For a game that was only about 2 1/2 years old when I joined its not been a very welcoming experience; being deigned your free joining ships, and then to see all these other ships in the game you want but they are apparently locked away from you forever because, in my case, I was busy serving my country instead of playing this game before. I wonder how many other new players feel similarly.
  15. Considering what to buy to take advantage of doubloon cash back thing. LWM review makes me think Hipper is not outclassed by Eugen. Your experience in Prinz Eugen? Buy and regret? Buy and like?
  16. SilentFLame

    Recommended Premium DD

    Hi All Been getting back into the game recently and was thinking of dropping some cash on a premium ship finally. Been enjoying my destroyers to no end so i'm thinking of grabbing a premium one of those. But having been out of the loop for a while I was wondering if you guys had any recommendations on which one will be a sound purchase? I've heard a lot of good things about the Loyang due to it's hydro but thought i'd check in again since that thread was from 2017. Thanks in advance all! (and sorry if this is a question asked hundreds of times before, I don't dwell on the forums and couldn't see a similar thread in the more recent posts)
  17. Hello Ive been wondering what I should buy with the money I have atm. I'm a player who plays a ton of Battleships and Destroyers. (I only have british cruiser to play for cruisers ex. Mino) So my friends told me to get the Nelson since its really fun but I also wanted to try out the cruisers. I have tried Takao(Atago ver. Arp) and Mino but I have never really got around trying german cruisers before. since Prinz Eugen and Hipper just got buffed recently (Eugen with Heal charges and Hipper with better rof) There is also a Scharnhorst in the shop. But since they all have their strengths and weaknesses I have watched videos of CCs playing them and listened to them explaining it. Still Its way hard for me to decide. Can you guys recommend me something and maybe also tell me why? (FYI, I have played mino,Musashi,Tirpitz,takao,Yueyang so far. I did enjoy Yueyang and mino with radar.)
  18. DFaultPlayR69

    Musashi or Alaska

    I'm pretty much close to getting 750,000 FXP. I was supposed initially get Musashi, but with the announcement of USS Alaska, I'm now confused whether which ship is more worth it. I know Musashi plays more of the traditional BB gameplay, like going bow on and getting citadel nukes on anything. But I'm kinda curious with the Alaska. How does it play, from what I know, it was 305mm guns, so I'm guessing it plays like a cruiser hunter, like Scharnhorst? or can it not brawl close range? Also how does the two compare in the case of credit gain?
  19. I know I'm still far from getting the Salem, (cuz I only have 50k coal atm) but I want to plan ahead whether if I should get the Salem or Musashi. What I want to know is, how does it compare to it's counterpart, the Des Moines, and does it compete well against other tierX ships? Also, how good is it with credit farming compared to other high tier premiums like Missouri, Musashi, and Kronshtadt? For playstyle, I think I know how to use US Cruisers, I already have Baltimore and Cleveland, and almost ready to get the Buffalo.
  20. Nothing Msg and No NOTIFICATIONS,Just Suddenly when i End game Can anyone tell me what happen?thankyou
  21. There is Tachibana Lima (tier 2 premium destroyer) mission available for both EU an NA servers. The mission runs between 23rd May to 4th June. https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/common/free-premium-tachibana/ Why is this mission not available for Asian server ? Its a Japanese Ship so why not for players playing game on Asian server ? It would have been nice if it was made available for us.
  22. Lowyat

    Premium shop info

    Looking at the prem shop i am seeing ships on deep discounts for example Ishizuchi marked with 80% Available for you: 1 is this user specific? ya'll seeing the same thing?
  23. Hi all I'm after a consensus please. I bought a "Return of the Collection Bundle", primarily because I wanted the two permanent camos it says it includes. The specific wording of it (which you can see in the premium shop yourselves in the special offers) is "Earn two permanent camos with a Big Collection Container...". I spent my money, and received a bunch of random flags and a couple of temporary camos. No permanent camos. So I logged a ticket. The first response I got was that I can't trade what I receive in random packages. Since they had clearly missed the point, I responded saying I didn't want to trade, I just wanted what I had paid for. Their latest (and, most likely, final) response was "The Return of the Collection bundle is consists of 5 Bismarck boxes. It does not include 2 permanent camos as you claimed. It says "Earn two permanent camos with a Big Collection Container.." As description indicated, you may earn two permanent camos from those containers. It does not indicate that the bundle includes two permanent camos." So..... Am I completely off base here? I would like to think I have a pretty good grasp of the english language - when a description says "Earn" something, I expect to get it. And their final response reinforces that - saying that "earning" something means that you "MAY earn something" completely contradicts itself. In my view, "earning" something DOES indicate that it includes something. Begin...
  24. I could get Missouri today if I wanted. I have about 150k free XP and another 800k or more XP banked on elite ships. It would require over 25,000 doubloons to convert the XP though, or about $100 US. As probably the most desirable premium ship in the game, the price tag is not unreasonable I guess. (two and a half Atagos, approximately) Is that how most people obtain this ship though, or do most people actually manage to accumulate 750k free XP without converting? How many games would that take, even?
  25. Hey_Potato

    Missouri Income

    I realised that the credits earn from Missouri is significantly lower as compared to few months back. Was there any changes to the credit multiplier effect which I am not aware of? Just an average game but with such result a couple of months back I am certainly to earn at least 800k basic credits with premium a/c..if with zulu flag should be around 970k credits.
×