Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'compensation'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • World of Warships - Asia Language Based Communities
    • English Speaking Community
    • 繁體中文討論區
    • 日本語コミュニティ
    • 한국어 커뮤니티
  • Mod Section
    • Player Modifications
  • Public Test Forums
    • English Speaking Community
    • 繁體中文討論區
    • 日本語コミュニティ
  • Locked Threads
    • Locked Threads

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Drag Interests

Found 6 results

  1. Wargaming, As you nerfed the RN tier 10 tech line BB Conqueror in update 0.8.8 and stole her 457mm main gun option to give that to Thunderer, your "new", Coal only purchasable, clone of Conqueror, I believe it is only fair that anyone who had unlocked Conqueror, or had commenced working on the RN BB tech line prior to update 0.8.8 should be given a voucher to purchase Thunderer at half the normal Coal price (once they have unlocked Conqueror). Players invest considerable time and effort, and sometimes also money, into researching a ship line with the final goal to unlock the pinnacle tier 10 ship of that line. People generally know the options and characteristics of the ship they are working towards and when they finally unlock that reward to then discover you have taken, without compensation, a major component from that ship, and then are trying to sell that component back to them as part of a "new" version of effectively the same ship is totally wrong on any ethical or moral grounds. For me I've finally unlocked Conqueror today and what should have been something exciting quickly turned to disappointment and anger as I realised I had been jipped when I discovered my new Conqueror didn't have the option to change to the 457mm main guns, an options I've known about since I first looked into the Conqueror and started working on the RN BB line. I imagine that in your Terms and Conditions for using WoWS you probably have clauses in there giving you the right to change aspects of ships for balancing purposes. I argue that there is balancing and then there is outright stealing a module from a ship to give it to a repackaged version of the same ship, the two are not the same. Wargaming please do the right thing and compensate Conqueror owners by, for example, giving them a substantial discount on Thunderer. For those who owned Conqueror and have since purchased Thunderer please consider giving them a partial Coal refund. PS. The current in-game description for Conqueror: "This ship was designed as a battleship with increased firepower on the basis of the British experience in ship construction gained during World War II. The project was notable for the 457 mm main guns, which were developed in the early 1920s and were the most powerful British naval artillery systems." So WG where are these 457mm guns mentioned here, you know the ones we grinded our a$$es of to get? That's right you stole them. To everyone with Conqueror, or working towards it; the 457mm guns may not have been everyone's favourite choice, you may not even miss them but the fact is you earned them, but they stole them from you without compensating you for it or even instead adding something else to Conqueror to replace them. For WG celebration of WoWS' 4th birthday they stole this module from you so they could resell them back to you as "Thundered". So what will WG steal off us for their next celebration? PPS. To any troll that might attack me for making this suggestion; just imagine that one day your favourite ship in WoWS, whatever that is, suddenly had a major module removed from it and then WG tried to sell you a clone of that ship with that module in it. I think you would be fairly and rightfully pissed off, so think of that before you add any snide comments here.
  2. for eg: So I have my fubuki(current T8 IJN dd) that will move to T6 and I will get a new Kagero and the Xp stays with her. All the premium camo will be 50 % since Wg is compensating for both the old and new line.So if you have or buy the permanent camo for the Hatsuharu now, you'll then get it free on the Akasuki. One question:I have trop acceleration skill in my Fubuki.Will they provide captian skills reset this time?.cause i don't want trop acceleration for my new kagero. Sauce:https://www.reddit.com/r/WorldOfWarships/comments/5eo6gl/ijn_dd_compensation_from_tuccy_tldr_version/
  3. i have a hatsuharu and i have already have the fubuki and in the hatsuharu i have 62k exp. so when the new DDs are added will i have the 62k exp in my tier 6 hatsuharu or the new IJN DD.
  4. Can some one please explain to me why I lose more credits and xp when someone runs into me (than the person responsible) simply because they cannot be bothered to look where they are going??? I understand that in the heat of battle you don't always have the time to look but I am talking at the start, when there is NO battle going on. Obviously international shipping rules do not apply in this game. Why is there no distinction of blame in a collision? I am tired of being penalized because I get run into by some idiot who starts their ship moving then goes to binocular view and stays there like they are the only one on the ocean. Is this ever going to be fixed or is it to be left in the "too hard" basket?
  5. Kleiss

    Lag compensation

    I'm currently in usa on my study trip, and getting 100-150 ping, stable. Do i need to compensate for the lag with extra lead when aiming? Just wondering.
  6. Can someone please explain how the compensation calculations work. It seams really unfair, marine navigation does not seem to come into the calculation. I recently was rammed on my portside. The cost for me was 14,393 credits and 57 exp. Whilst the other ship was clearly in the wrong, their cost was only 71 credits. Its happened numerous occassions where the other ship is clearly in the wrong but the majority of the cost was borne by me.
×