Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'changes'.
Found 3 results
b6bs9l33t_____6ndv9g3n3 posted a topic in Developers' SectionHi, In the new 0.11.5 update communication we can read in the section of the community tokens in the armory the following paragraph in red: Due to the forthcoming separation of economic bonuses from ship exteriors, starting with the release of Update 0.11.6, all permanent camouflages for researchable ships, all expendable camouflages, and the Signal Spoils bundle will no longer be available in the Naval Community section. The tab will be replenished with bundles with economic bonuses, as well as a special container with expendable camouflages. Given that some people have invested quite some $$ over the years in especially the special economical signals, it would be fair to ask what will happen to these changes, and what will happen to the pool of signals that everyone owns in their accounts. What are the details of the "separation of economic bonuses from ship exteriors"? Any information provided will be appreciated. Looking forward to your reply.
Has anyone else noticed that since 0.5.5 the accuracy of ALL ships seems off? I thought I was imagining it but it seems impossible to get multiple citadels in a salvo lately or for BB even to hit a CA. my average accuracy for all ships for 0.54 was over 30 percent with some approaching 50 percent and i was getting quad or even on rare occasions quintuple citadels with mt CA guns on other cruisers at range when I aimed properly. and in close at less than 10 km I was occasionally one shotting other CAs with my cruisers. They were broadside on plus neworleans with 9 8 inch guns. I know I could of just forgotten how to aim but that seems unlikely as it is happening for all ships. I have also noticed that there appears to be a discrepancy in the dispersion definitions given in the WOWs wiki. http://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Gunnery_%26_Armor_Penetration_%28WoWS%29 The paragraphs relating to dispersion give the specification that the dispersion values in port are the 50 percent horizontal axis at maximum range. It then goes on to claim that the 50 percent contour is equivalent to 1 standard deviation when it is clearly not. The 50 percent contour would be equivalent to 0.67449 of a standard deviation and it is well known that 1 standard deviation would be where it is 68.27% within those bounds. This is of course assuming normal distribution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviation I have also noticed this being on the recieving end of a lot of shells that it seems that the accuracy of everyone has dropped of with less frequent shell hits. So what is going on?