Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'azuma'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • World of Warships - Asia Language Based Communities
    • English Speaking Community
    • 繁體中文討論區
    • 日本語コミュニティ
    • 한국어 커뮤니티
  • Mod Section
    • Player Modifications
  • Public Test Forums
    • English Speaking Community
    • 繁體中文討論區
    • 日本語コミュニティ
  • Locked Threads
    • Locked Threads

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Drag Interests

Found 5 results

  1. andrianpt

    Your Azuma Story ...

    Bought an Azuma as I cannot stand that the cute Azuma I got from AL collection (hey those lolis are cute) didn't have a ship to captain. And yes most of the times the Azumas are squishy and get blapped left and right quite easily. But at least sometime, Azumas will give you a smile, even in defeat, when you prove you can get a DS in an Azuma.... The only kill your potato infested team got in an embarassing blowout. Share your Azuma moments here ...
  2. While in port the Azuma has no ship stats visable. And the armor is so weak the harrigumo can pen it with HE every shot.
  3. S4pp3R

    T9 Azuma

    OK first off, making Azuma T9 is the right choice... You have no idea how happy it makes people if you are not making it a steel ship (my hope)... However has WG lost it's mind? It's literally less tanky than Atago in current state. I know it's WiP but are you kidding? Here's an idea, take the Zao principle to her: - low HP for class (Super Cruiser) - troll armour for class (don't do Stalingrad though) - amazingly accurate guns (one thing that seems to be right) with high damage per salvo - average DPM - great stealth Easy! She has no radar or torps so just make her shine with guns and stealth, simplez.
  4. Subete_Yoi

    Japanese Armoured Cruiser Yakumo

    It's no bloody surprised that the WWI ship section is totally empty and this topic is it's first! Anyways, I'll try my best to provide some content about WWI or anything near that time period ships despite my absolute lack of knowledge about long floating chuck of steel (I might learn something in return!). Japanese Armoured Cruiser 八雲 Yakumo Look at that beautiful piece of relic (Full view at 1:30) Specifications: Type: Armoured Cruiser Displacement: 9801 tons Length: 124.64 meters Breadth: 19.57 meters No of shafts: 2 Engine: 24 VTE Belleville boilers Power: 15500 h.p. Top speed: 20.5 knots (38km/h) Armament: 4 - 203/45 Armstrong U 12 - QF 6 inch /40 naval guns 12 - QF 12 pounder 12 cwt naval guns 8 - 47/30 21/2pdr Hotchkiss Mk I 5 - 457mm Torpedo Tubes Naval Ram Armour (unsure): Belt: 89mm - 170mm Bulkheads: 152mm Upper belt: 127mm Barrettes: 152mm Turrets: 152mm Casemates: 51mm - 150mm Deck: 51mm - 63mm Conning tower: 76mm - 356mm Torpedo room: 152mm Info: Fate: Scrapped 1 April 1947 After reading back, I can already sense that there are tons of mistakes that I might not noticed. So dear historians and warships experts, do tell if there's any inaccuracy or something to add or point out. Don't want to spread the wrong info in the historical section now, would we?
  5. Subete_Yoi

    Japanese Armoured Cruiser Azuma

    Japanese Armoured Cruiser 吾妻 Azuma Specifications: Type: Armoured Cruiser Displacement: 9456 tons Length: 131.5 meters Breadth: 20.94 meters Shafts: 2 Engine: 24 Belleville boilers Power: 17000 h.p. Top speed: 20 knots (37km/h) Armaments: 4 - 20.3 cm/45 Type 41 Naval Guns 12 - QF 6 inch /40 Naval Guns 12 - QF 12 Pounder 12 CWT Naval Guns 8 - QF 3 Pounder Hotchkiss Guns 5 - 457mm Torpedo Tubes Armour: Belt: 88mm - 170mm Upper Belt: 125mm Barbette: 150mm Turrets: 150mm Casemate: 150mm Deck: 62mm Conning Tower: 75mm - 360mm Torpedo Room: 150mm Info: Fate: Sunk (Scrapped) 15 July 1945 After reading back, I can already sense that there are tons of mistakes that I might not noticed. So dear historians and warships experts, do tell if there's any inaccuracy or something to add or point out. Don't want to spread the wrong info in the historical section now, would we?
×