Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'Moskva'.
Found 10 results
-
Preemptively making this thread in case WG mess up the Moskva changes and you don’t get Moskva (and Kirov) as a special ships (And Kirov as premium) when you should. You should get Moskva as a Special Ship If; You have researched her, but not purchased her. You own her in your port. You had her, but sold her prior to launch of 0.9.5. You had her, but reset the branch. The same applies to Kirov, except Kirov will be a Premium. Now we wait.
-
after 2854 combined battles of world of warships, i have finally reached the top of the line, my first tier 10, the moskva. did i spend half a week playing donskoi because i didn't know when the patch for moskva to be converted to coal was dropping and i got paranoid? yes. in fact i only spent $12 AUD to get the sufficient doubloons (2,500) and it took me a day (with xp flags and camos mounted) to get 70k XP in fact, it only took 25 battles in other news, my stats are ever so painfully improving thank you for your time
- 20 replies
-
- 4
-
-
- bussian rias
- moskva
- (and 1 more)
-
이제 천여판째 플레이 하고 있는 뉴비입니다. 처음 워쉽을 시작했을때 많은 올드비 유저분들에게 소련 순양함트리 개편에 대해서 들었고 소련 순양함 트리를 먼저 올릴 것을 조언 받았습니다. 손에도 맞고 재밌어서 모스크바까지 올리는 것은 문제가 되지 않았습니다. 일주일 전 모스크바를 연구하고 구입까지 완료했을때는 뿌듯함도 들고 좋았습니다. 하지만 충격적인 소식을 들었네요. 모스크바를 연구만 해도 특별함정으로 변하는 모스크바를 얻을 수 있다는 소식이요. 아니 꾸역꾸역 크레딧을 모아 구입까지 했는데 사지 않아도 준다는 소식은 뭡니까? 클랜 조선소도 완공이 안된 상태여서 1950만 크레딧 거의 2천만 크레딧을 쓰고 구입했더니 말짱 도루묵이네요? 2천만 크레딧이 무슨 개이름도 아니고 현금으로 2천만 크레딧을 구입하려면 얼마인지는 아십니까? 심지어 영구위장 산 사람은 위장도 그냥 준다고해서 멘붕상태던데... 모스크바 구입한 사람들은 이렇게 손해 보고 끝나야 하는 건가요? 크레딧과 금화 반환은 해줘야 되는거 아닌가요? 진짜 워쉽 재밌게 하다가 현타 왔습니다. 2천만 크레딧 저같은 쉽린이 뉴비들한테는 쉽게 모을 수 있는 금액이 아니에요. 지금 인벤이나 갤러리 같은 커뮤니티에서는 모스크바 다시 팔아서 반값이라도 건져야 되냐고 물어보는 사람들로 넘칩니다. 순양함 개편 후 네프스키를 주지 않는 것 까지는 그렇다고 해도 모스크바 관련 크레딧과 금화는 조치해 주셔야 할 거 같습니다. 이건 강탈 아닙니까?
-
ソビエト連邦の巡洋艦ブランチがメインの軽巡洋艦とサブの重巡洋艦に変更され、既存艦艇が一部プレミアム艦艇に変更され、新規艦艇が追加される情報公開されましたので、和訳を行いました。 この情報は ST 向けであり、今後変更や撤回がされる場合があります。 https://note.com/torpbeat/n/n86640b738264
-
Is Moskva's legendary upgrade worth it? I'm almost finished the 3rd stage. Is -11% dispersion noticeable? And how does it stack with Aiming System Mod 1? And also what ships have a "Worth it" legendary upgrade?
-
Which heavy cruiser line for dynamic / kiting playstyle?
Player______1 posted a topic in General Discussions
I’d like to choose a heavy cruiser line with a dynamic, mobile, kiting playstyle. I’m primarily interested in either the Hindenburg or the Moskva. I am a newbie and I am a long way from tier x, but want to pick the right line for me. I think i’d prefer to go down the russian cruisers towards the moskva because its fast and seems built for long range, but I’ve been reading a lot about bow tanking in that line and am wondering if the Moskva is really better suited to a static playstyle. How dynamic is the Moskva’s playstyle? Is it a static bow-on playstyle or a dynamic kiting playstyle? Would the Hindenburg be a better choice? Or should I go for the Zao? Although for some reason the Zao doesnt appeal to me as much as the hindy or the moskva. -
Moskva: + Laser railguns + Good AP and HE with good reload + 50 mm plating to troll most CA HE and BB AP with - Permaspotted by Yamatos - Tall citadel - 1km turning radius - Expensive to run (I already got permacamo for Zao I'm not buying another one) Kronshtadt: + Huge health pool + High caliber railguns + Waterline citadel + More decent concealment + T9 premium, therefore cheaper to run and likelier to turn a profit - Overmatchable plating and citadel roof - Dispersion of a BB - HE is not good enough for the reload - AP has long fuse time that risks overpens on CAs - 750k FXP and I'm only 10th of the way there I'm just looking for a big Russian ship while I wait for the RU BBs. Stalingrad might make this question moot depending on what the alternative non-CW requirements are if any and the final stats on that ship. I am currently at Chapayev for the grind.
-
What ships or Ship Lines have the highest velocity shells (Speed). I heard the Soviet Railguns were pretty good in this regard?
-
Right now in Tier 10: Shimakaze got nerfed torps, underpowered Zao nerfed invis fire, still good to play with Lets not talk about CVs. Montana good all rounder except when vs yamato. Hindenburg, not so bad, not so good Des Moines No CV=Poor credit /exp yield Yamato, welp, still good when VS other BBs, but got burned bad. Gearing's fun to play Khabarovsk is???????What does this ship even do? Annoying BB and CA players to hell and terrorize DD players? But still not op Now Moskva....this thing Huge health pool, AA better than IJN, can bounce BB shell's armour when angled, high speed, decent RPM, soviet penetration, magic shell velocity, BBs range The thing is Devs try to justify it by saying it has sluggish turning and bad concealment, But you dont even need to go frontline or to use broadside to unleash this things power, all moskvas just turn bow at enemy BB CAat 18-20 Km and fire non stop, BB can not do anything about it. Yes other nation's cruisers can use concealment to surprise attack, but that doesn't stop it from having the best shell arc/velocity/penetration of any CA in game. Because its better than IJN AA even CVs prefer to torp a poor ibuki/zao/atago over it. German CA have good AP penetration and torps. But in return gets bad armour, bad HE and bad conceal Japan CA have good HE, good shell arc best CA torps and good conceal, but in return gets ultra bad AA, huge citadel, lowest rpm and sluggish turning and no radar American CA have best AA, best RPM and radar, but in return get ultra bad shell arc thus not even good shells are gonna hit anything, and no torps Russian CA Has Good HE, decent RPM, best shell arc, long range, best penetration, high speed, high HP, radar what else does it possibly need? Your opinions, keep it civil.
