

THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42
Member-
Content Сount
175 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
482
Community Reputation
35 GoodAbout THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42
-
Rank
Lieutenant
- Profile on the website THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42
-
Insignia
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Do all Japanese Cruisers and destroyers Suck?
THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42 replied to Halsey_rex's topic in General Discussions
Idk about IJN DDs but low tier IJN cruisers (all I’ve played) are good. Their torps are really nice and their guns aren’t bad either, the trouble is at those tiers their armor scheme is DD levels of bad. -
🚢 Closed Test 0.11.5, New Ships (British Battlecruiser, British Cruiser, Brazilian Battleship, and CWoN Destroyer)
THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42 replied to S0und_Theif's topic in General Discussions
That would be nice. People would probably ask WG to add it to a bunch of low-tier cruisers and battleships that had fixed tubes historically, although these would not have had torpedo turning irl. -
🚢 Closed Test 0.11.5, New Ships (British Battlecruiser, British Cruiser, Brazilian Battleship, and CWoN Destroyer)
THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42 replied to S0und_Theif's topic in General Discussions
Eh, I doubt it. Has WG said anything about how torpedo turning is actually going to work? My assumption is that you will be able to fire the torpedo but set it to turn once in a certain direction before it gets to a certain distance. It might work to shoot around islands but it probably wouldn’t be as bad as homing torpedoes. -
One of the Slava class just sunk
THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42 replied to FBI_IS_WATCHING_U's topic in General Discussions
No it can’t have sank because of fire, Neptune doesn’t have HE -
One of the Slava class just sunk
THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42 replied to FBI_IS_WATCHING_U's topic in General Discussions
Yeah Moskva sank from stacked fires and flooding after assault by HE spam and torps When Russia realises ‘oh maybe attaching 20 Bazalt missiles to the outside of the superstructure isn’t such a good idea’ -
📰 Closed Test Results, Support Aircraft Carriers
THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42 replied to S0und_Theif's topic in General Discussions
I think they need air-dropped mines, the ability to drop spotting aircraft over a certain area so any ships in that area get the consumable bonus, and maybe a similar thing with sonobuoys (which give hydro bonuses to anything close to them or something?) also, support carriers, hmm, who wants escort DDs next? -
Go home, MM! You're drunk.
THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42 replied to Reinhard_of_Avercland's topic in General Discussions
Yes, all true. Also BBs most CV proof *Musashi laughs ironically* -
Brazilian tech tree coming up?
THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42 replied to Andy_Siau's topic in General Discussions
If WG does not announce a Commonwealth tech tree by the end of the year I bet a lot of people are going to be very unhappy. -
Brazilian tech tree coming up?
THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42 replied to Andy_Siau's topic in General Discussions
My bet is that the ‘something Japanese’ is either a battle cruiser BB split or a CL line if it happens -
When You're Busted By WG...
THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42 replied to DDayCobra's topic in General Discussions
🤣 LMAO -
Go home, MM! You're drunk.
THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42 replied to Reinhard_of_Avercland's topic in General Discussions
Probably because they are the most CV proof. -
New ships armor layout
THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42 replied to Not_Ch0m1n's topic in General Discussions
Don’t encourage them. Although guided missiles would be interesting. -
New ships armor layout
THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42 replied to Not_Ch0m1n's topic in General Discussions
Agreed, 1955 seems more accurate. Especially seeing as she’s based on Minotaur and Minotaur is based off of a 1947-48 design. -
this is illegal..........
THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42 replied to JeffGetReck's topic in General Discussions
You see mostly players on the player side in coop reasonably often but in randoms, see my above post… -
this is illegal..........
THE_BiRds_stRIke_BaCk_42 replied to JeffGetReck's topic in General Discussions
They do have T1 randoms but 99% of the time you are the only non-bot in the match