Project45_Opytny

德国凯撒的描述没问题，习惯上“超无畏舰”指主炮口径超过12英寸/305毫米的条约前战列舰（如布列塔尼，猎户座，纽约这些）。 约克的描述也是，改成“各项性能均衡的一条巡洋舰，在装甲防护方面超越了当时受华盛顿条约限制的第一代重巡洋舰，而火力超越了轻巡洋舰。” 图伦内的英语原文介绍写得就是一泡污（WG你给我解释一下battleship-dreadnought是什么意思），凭借上下文推测意思更像是“它是具有辨识度非常高的外形和菱形火炮布局的法国末代前无畏战舰的进一步发展。” 塔什干的那句描述我自己再捋一下。我自己翻译成“她是苏联海军在意大利订制的，被授予20I型的型号。” 我建议再缓一缓，WG汉化团队埋的雷实在是太多了。例如明斯克（神他妈前面写了驱逐领舰后面还能继续搞出“领袖级驱逐舰”），清醒和阿卡司塔（这帮傻X弄不明白“三联”“四联”鱼雷管吗？），意大利Condottieri级轻巡洋舰的常见译法应该一直都是“佣兵队长级”，青叶和里昂的描述（”代表了进一步发展“就这么难理解吗？），等等。 呃……妙高这个英语原文的意思是说”与外国条约巡洋舰不同，妙高的装甲防护足以抵挡同类型战舰的主炮攻击“。就“第一代”条约巡洋舰而言妙高的102主装的确就是同期最强，特伦托70彭萨科拉64郡级25迪凯纳裸奔……

凭印象说，我记得WG官方汉化团队的丰功伟绩包括将科罗拉多和妙高的描述含义（科罗拉多的航速，妙高的装甲防护）正好弄反了，中国人民解放军海军旗的介绍翻译得狗屁不通，海雾妙高的描述对应的是足柄，以及永远都弄不清楚的”首舰“不是”旗舰“。 我慢慢看一下这个总结……

A clone of Alabama with special camouflage schemes that is given to community volunteers.

I think... I would grab Bumblebee and assign him to a "laid-up" USN destroyer (Clemson perhaps as I haven't gone deep into DDs yet) when I complete the chain. Last year I've got 2 Rumble commanders from containers and I think Bumblebee's voice is much better after listening to examples provided by the official Wiki.

I don't think that the mode has any bias favoring either party personally as for now personally speaking. I have found this mode quite fun though it makes me unaccustomed at the beginning. As the NA Community has commented, this mode breaks the stale long range meta and promotes close range knife-fighting, being a quite favorable combination of aspects from both PvE Scenarios and PvP gameplay, and should become a more "formal", or even permanent mode. Also an interesting little detail: the Liberty ships carry M4 Sherman tanks, and it seems that at least these tanks have animations of turning their turrets and firing as secondary batteries (and they can even be knocked out like other secondaries), as if the tank crews aboard decide to help the convoy defend itself with every means possible.

The rewards are a mixture of "Cybertronian" and "35th Anniversary Collection" containers I recall. You have got duplicate items I suppose?

这个也得按具体情况分析吧。比如IFHE改制之后的斯摩棱斯克……印象里有主张全力堆点火率而放弃IFHE来着？ 不过8级那条MK-6方案点IFHE收益肯定比斯摩棱斯克大吧我觉得，向下能洗26壳战列舰，向上能抗大部分巡洋舰而不用全部依靠鱼雷摸奖和击中上层建筑（2020年9月的一篇基辅攻略就认为可以考虑IFHE）。5级点IFHE可以对抗分房范围内的所有战列舰（纳尔逊32中段除外）了，6级黛朵133炮情况类似一般的6级轻巡洋舰，点上之后27穿能洗6~7级战列舰和8级巡洋舰以及有特别待遇的彭萨科拉，新奥尔良和约克这三位，打高级战列舰一样无力。 最后确实我也看到有人云评测，别到最后搞成被重炮德驱压制……

现在感觉还有了另一个问题——因为口径演变抽风结果主炮IFHE选不选一样抽风…… 简单地说就是感觉5级，6级和8级可以试一试IFHE（130炮点上IFHE应该是27穿，牺牲点火率换对巡洋舰和低级战列舰的直伤），127炮应该就不推荐了。

WG把简体中文汉化团队炒了，不说浩舰了，找我国学外语的大学生兼职（厚颜无耻地以我自己作为参考……）我觉得都能至少是避免这种莫名其妙的错误。 很早之前的版本希佩尔白板船体（用的还是反映其下水时状态的垂直舰首和全身37手拉机）用过一种差一些的高爆弹，但后来为了简化研发过程和改善白板体验被连同那个船体一起删掉了。 上古版本时欧根亲王基本上就是银币希佩尔的复制人，血量多一点，转弯半径略大一点（穹甲比希佩尔好一点可能也是在那个时期就有了的）。不过当时的风评记得可能更加不堪，我记得直接看到过”欧根就是傻X，纯骗钱的“的一句话评价。后来两条船各自得到了有区别性的加强，希佩尔加强转舵时间和射速（去年年底还略微加强了一把射速），欧根给了个大保健……确实区别出来了，但强度还就是那样，玩起来还是得捏着鼻子，指望撞大运RNG眷顾，或者是为了老婆或者信仰而用爱发电。 （就我在这边看到的，有万战老玩家用爱发电拿排位战攒的金币弄了条欧根的，还有用社区代币开箱子白嫖到的。我在去年愚人节期间应该是租过24小时的欧根，总体而言乏善可陈，一种类似现在开哈勒姆这样的无能为力感——虽然至少不至于卡着15公里射程干着急了，但换成了原装德味掺沙炮弹……）

That's... more probably some sort of "honeymoon" period with newly acquired ships I suppose. In fact I effectively "jumped" from Omaha to Cleveland, grinding both Dallas and Helena via Scenarios (the latter with the help of 200% Anniversary bonus as it is a chore to grind any Tier 7 light cruisers in Randoms currently, not to say the floaty shells) and haven't mastered how to fire over islands yet (yes seriously). Cleveland seems to have the best agility among the entire USN CL branch, surpassing both her predecessors and the higher-tiered ones. In addition I consider it's a pity that Helena, such a legendary warship with an outstanding service history, suffered a kick in the teeth in terms of gaming experience as the result of the IFHE Rework. And Montpelier uses the more floaty Mk 34 HE shells rather than Cleveland and her following ones' Mk 39. In fact I learned this fact with the Ballistics, Penetration & Dispersion Chart Tool from "iwarship" too... some other interesting facts include the B-31 guns aboard Kotovsky is in fact better than the staple B-38 in terms of ballistic performance, and the confirmation that all USN heavy cruisers share a same type of HE shells and a same ballistics performance.

This is indeed worrying as WG has used the torpedoes of Zao to argue that she is not that underpowered. As for USN cruisers I have found Cleveland a blast (as I played Japanese and Soviet cruisers before). She is very, surprisingly nimble (in comparison it is almost a struggle to bring Soviet cruisers to a turn), her guns are quick-firing and fast-turning, and her ballistics at least is better than Dallas and Helena.

First this must be rendered by a mod as WG does not give tech tree ships nameplates or pennant numbers even for one-off examples like Emile Bertin and Algerie. Secondly... in short the combination of "ij" is treated as one single letter in Dutch language. There exist fonts that render "IJ" as the picture above.

Personally speaking I am mostly currently interested in the Tier 8 one: it is obvious and certain that she would fly the ensign of PLAN; there exist, however slim possibilities that she might be built in PRC (pardon my "home country bias") and the performance of Soviet 130-mm B-2U guns have been legendary (they has superior ballistics than French 152-mm and even the USN 203-mm). However there will also be many challenges. The smoke-firing cruisers themselves are more difficult to master than regular ones in my opinion. Since Tier 6 they will suffer much from the reworked IFHE, facing a choice between being able to deal direct damage on other cruisers and lower tier battleships (up to Tier 8 one) and more chances of setting fire. WG has officially stated that the ships will have "rather low survivability", while a number of stealthy super heavy cruisers that can overmatch 16-mm have been recently introduced (Drake and Johan de Witt), not to say proper supercruisers. And it is almost certain that they will have rather small health pools, both due to their real life displacements and as a method of balance. It is clear that Yahagi, as a cruiser that focuses on her torpedo armaments, can at most be described as mediocre, also taking the example of Irian, the uncertain, RNG-dependent nature of torpedoes means that their main gun performance must be able to do much. And also they will be very Command skills hungry IMO.

Judging from previous examples it is also likely that this branch will be in early access at Lunar New Year 2022.

其实本来还有一种想法的……嗯……不是有谁都说不清楚的波兰重型坦克（好歹打了个“军事工程学院的学员设计作业”的名义，不过我看到也有人说全线其实都是个别波兰网民的历史架空YY强国，结果被WG背书了），意大利重型坦克和捷克重型坦克这些先例么，在50年代时的档案库里翻一翻（陈绍宽那种级别的就够用了），拿（还要不那么尖端的——50年代的底子摆在那里，史实上二战日制护卫舰用到70年代末，60年代第一型自行设计的护卫舰用的还是民用级别的柴油主机）苏系子系统参考黄河那样拼出若干“大跃进草案”来（其实还有就是苏系巡洋舰的电磁炮弹道给我的印象不错，哪怕其实打出的数据并不算很好）。 结果现在我们看到了神特么人人白嫖弗林特和奥斯汀……相比而言8级的那个MK-6小型巡洋舰方案好歹还算全新建模和此前没有提及过的方案。 无论是给PLAN还是海峡对岸，首先是要假设CL-154方案开工建成并服役了。我在想英国虎级轻巡和荷兰的七省联盟级的命运（我第一个想起来的其实就是虎，改造成直升机巡洋舰，马岛战争期间还从棺材里仰卧起坐了一次，拉美老顾客智利提出接盘但最终还是拆了）在这方面有没有参考价值。不过不是专业人士也不推演了……